Bayesian interpolants explain neural network inferences concisely.
problem Understanding neural network inferences.
method Adapting Craig interpolants for neural networks.
result Produces precise, understandable explanations.
On-device research index
arXiv research
A locally-built, LLM-digested index of recent arXiv papers in quant finance, geometry/topology, and statistical ML — keyword search served straight from SQLite on this machine.
168,695 papers · 148 categories
Trend · papers per month
48 results for “neural explanations”
This paper proposes a set of criteria to evaluate the objectiveness of explanation methods of neural networks, which is crucial for the development of explainable AI, but it also presents significant challenges. The core challenge is that people usually cannot obtain ground-truth explanations of the neural network. To …
New framework quantifies uncertainties in neural network explanations.
problem Lack of methods to quantify uncertainties in neural network explanations.
method Converts any explanation method into a Bayesian neural network method, modeling uncertainties.
result Allows quantification of explanation uncertainties and appropriate confidence levels.
Extends local attributions to Bayesian Neural Networks for improved explanations.
problem Lack of explanations for Bayesian Neural Networks' predictions.
method Extend local attributions to a probabilistic explanation distribution of BNNs.
result Enriches standard explanations with uncertainty information and visualizes explanation stability.
A new method explains RNNs by decision lists over skipgrams, improving explanation fidelity and interpretability.
problem Lack of understanding how input segments combine to form patterns in neural network outputs.
method Proposes a pipeline to explain RNNs using decision lists over skipgrams, creating synthetic and real-world datasets for evaluation.
result Persistently achieves high explanation fidelity and interpretable rules.
Despite a growing literature on explaining neural networks, no consensus has been reached on how to explain a neural network decision or how to evaluate an explanation. Our contributions in this paper are twofold. First, we investigate schemes to combine explanation methods and reduce model uncertainty to obtain a sing…
Study finds discrepancies in model explanations for clean vs. adversarial inputs.
problem Identifying adversarial attacks on neural networks.
method Utilized experimental results to propose a framework for detecting adversarial inputs.
result Proposed framework can identify adversarial inputs based on model explanations.
SpArX creates faithful explanations of neural networks' decision-making.
problem Challenges in explaining neural networks' decisions.
method Sparsifies MLPs while maintaining structure, then translates into QAFs for argumentative explanations.
result SpArX provides more faithful explanations than existing methods.
New method to evaluate visual explanations from neural networks.
problem Lack of consensus on measuring effectiveness of visual explanations.
method Proposed a new procedure for evaluating explanations using a range of sources.
result Demonstrated the benefit of combining different sources and the impact of bias parameters.
ID-ExpO fine-tunes neural networks for more faithful explanations.
problem Improving the faithfulness of explanations for complex machine learning models.
method Differentiable insertion/deletion metric-aware regularizers for optimization.
result Fine-tuned predictors produce more faithful explanations.
Explanation methods aim to make neural networks more trustworthy and interpretable. In this paper, we demonstrate a property of explanation methods which is disconcerting for both of these purposes. Namely, we show that explanations can be manipulated arbitrarily by applying visually hardly perceptible perturbations to…
RAW-Explainer generates interpretable subgraph explanations for link predictions in knowledge graphs.
problem Interpreting GNN predictions for link prediction in heterogeneous settings is challenging.
method RAW-Explainer uses random walk objective and neural network to generate connected, concise subgraph explanations.
result RAW-Explainer strikes a balance between explanation quality and computational efficiency.
DeConvNet, Guided BackProp, LRP, were invented to better understand deep neural networks. We show that these methods do not produce the theoretically correct explanation for a linear model. Yet they are used on multi-layer networks with millions of parameters. This is a cause for concern since linear models are simple …
A barrier to the wider adoption of neural networks is their lack of interpretability. While local explanation methods exist for one prediction, most global attributions still reduce neural network decisions to a single set of features. In response, we present an approach for generating global attributions called GAM, w…
Bayesian explanations are more resilient to adversarial attacks than deterministic ones.
problem Stability of saliency-based explanations under adversarial attacks in Neural Networks.
method Empirical and theoretical analysis of Bayesian vs deterministic Neural Networks.
result Bayesian explanations are more stable under adversarial perturbations and direct attacks.
The paper tackles one-for-many counterfactual explanations using column generation.
problem Minimizing the number of explanations needed for a group of instances with sparsity constraints.
method Developed a novel column generation framework to efficiently search for explanations for any black-box classifier.
result The column generation framework outperforms existing methods in scalability, computational performance, and solution quality.
PiNets provide faithful explanations for neural networks.
problem Lack of true explanations for neural network predictions.
method Pointwise-interpretable Networks (PiNets) that form linear models instance-wise.
result PiNets offer explanations that are meaningful, aligned, robust, and sufficient.
Proposes a new method for better explaining neural network decisions.
problem Challenges in explaining neural network decisions due to base-point choice.
method Introduces tangentially aligned integrated gradients to maximize explanation tangential alignment.
result Optimal base-point maximizes explanation tangential alignment, leading to more accurate interpretations.
Comparing Baseline Shapley and Integrated Gradients for Local Explanation: Some Additional Insightscs.LG
Paper compares two local explanation methods for machine learning models.
problem Comparing two local explanation methods for machine learning models.
method Integrated Gradients and Baseline Shapley methods.
result Additional insights on comparative behavior for tabular data and neural networks.
Simple aggregation of multiple methods defends against adversarial attacks on neural networks.
problem Manipulation of machine learning models to hide discriminating features.
method Aggregation of multiple explanation methods to make the model robust against adversarial attacks.
result The model remains robust even when the attacker has knowledge of the model weights and explanation methods.
HSIC-based method explains GNN structures.
problem Interpreting GNNs' complex dynamics.
method Flexible model-agnostic explanation using HSIC.
result Identifies crucial structures in GNNs.
COMRECGC finds common recourse for global counterfactual explanations in GNNs.
problem Finding common recourse for global counterfactual explanations in GNNs.
method Formalized the common recourse explanation problem and designed COMRECGC algorithm.
result COMRECGC outperforms strong baselines on four real-world graph datasets.
OrphicX generates causal explanations for GNNs by isolating latent causal factors.
problem Generating interpretable causal explanations for complex graph neural networks.
method Develops a generative model and objective function to isolate latent causal factors, maximizing information flow.
result OrphicX effectively identifies causal semantics, significantly outperforming alternatives.
New method quantifies intrinsic causal contributions in neural networks.
problem Measuring the causal influence of input features in deep neural networks.
method Proposes an identifiable generative post-hoc framework to quantify intrinsic causal contributions (ICC) as structural causal models.
result ICC generates more intuitive and reliable explanations compared to existing global explanation techniques.
Investigating the influence of noise and distractors on the interpretation of neural networksstat.ML
Understanding neural networks is becoming increasingly important. Over the last few years different types of visualisation and explanation methods have been proposed. However, none of them explicitly considered the behaviour in the presence of noise and distracting elements. In this work, we will show how noise and dis…
Formulates approach for guiding explanation types based on user specifications.
problem Creating explainable AI components from user-defined specifications.
method Develops a method for generating explanations based on user-defined specifications.
result Demonstrates feasibility of user-defined explanations for complex models like Bayesian networks and graph neural networks.
Humans are able to explain their reasoning. On the contrary, deep neural networks are not. This paper attempts to bridge this gap by introducing a new way to design interpretable neural networks for classification, inspired by physiological evidence of the human visual system's inner-workings. This paper proposes a neu…
DistShap parallelizes GNN explanation for large graphs.
problem Computational expense in attributing GNN predictions to specific edges or features.
method Distributed Shapley values across multiple GPUs for scalable GNN explanations.
result DistShap outperforms existing methods and scales to models with millions of features.
Deep learning is increasingly used as a building block of security systems. Unfortunately, neural networks are hard to interpret and typically opaque to the practitioner. The machine learning community has started to address this problem by developing methods for explaining the predictions of neural networks. While sev…
Recently, a method [7] was proposed to generate contrastive explanations for differentiable models such as deep neural networks, where one has complete access to the model. In this work, we propose a method, Model Agnostic Contrastive Explanations Method (MACEM), to generate contrastive explanations for \emph{any} clas…
We introduce a method, KL-LIME, for explaining predictions of Bayesian predictive models by projecting the information in the predictive distribution locally to a simpler, interpretable explanation model. The proposed approach combines the recent Local Interpretable Model-agnostic Explanations (LIME) method with ideas …
Post-hoc explanations improve CNNs by replacing final linear layer with k-means classifier.
problem CNNs lack accurate data representation in their built-in prototypes.
method Introduces k-means-based post-hoc explanations for CNNs, leveraging spatial consistency of convolutional receptive fields.
result Using shallower, less compressed feature activations improves semantic fidelity at the cost of slight predictive performance.
Explaining the output of a complicated machine learning model like a deep neural network (DNN) is a central challenge in machine learning. Several proposed local explanation methods address this issue by identifying what dimensions of a single input are most responsible for a DNN's output. The goal of this work is to a…
Although neural networks can achieve very high predictive performance on various different tasks such as image recognition or natural language processing, they are often considered as opaque "black boxes". The difficulty of interpreting the predictions of a neural network often prevents its use in fields where explaina…
The paper introduces a method to assess the reliability of model explanations.
problem Assessing the quality and reliability of model explanations.
method An Ordinal Consensus Approach using diverse bootstrapped surrogate explainers.
result Uncertainty estimates offer actionable insights beyond standard surrogate explainers.
Despite the recent development in the topic of explainable AI/ML for image and text data, the majority of current solutions are not suitable to explain the prediction of neural network models when the datasets are tabular and their features are in high-dimensional vectorized formats. To mitigate this limitation, theref…
Artificial intelligence (AI) comes with great opportunities but can also pose significant risks. Automatically generated explanations for decisions can increase transparency and foster trust, especially for systems based on automated predictions by AI models. However, given, e.g., economic incentives to create dishones…
Neural networks memorize exceptions, leading to poor generalization.
problem Memorization of exceptions hinders neural network generalization.
method Formalized memorization-generalization interplay, proposed MAT to shift logits.
result MAT improves generalization by learning robust patterns invariant across distributions.
The paper introduces a method to learn models with built-in explanations.
problem Lack of interpretability in deep learning models.
method Formalizes learning with explanation constraints and provides a learning theoretic framework.
result Models that satisfy these constraints have reduced Rademacher complexities, improving their performance.
We propose a novel perspective to understand deep neural networks in an interpretable disentanglement form. For each semantic class, we extract a class-specific functional subnetwork from the original full model, with compressed structure while maintaining comparable prediction performance. The structure representation…
Evaluates explanations of LTR models using decision paths and compares their accuracy.
problem Challenges in evaluating local explanations of LTR models due to lack of ground truth feature importance scores.
method Focuses on tree-based LTR models, extracts ground truth feature importance scores using decision paths, and compares them with explanation techniques.
result Explanation accuracy varies depending on the model and data point.
The impressive performance of neural networks on natural language processing tasks attributes to their ability to model complicated word and phrase compositions. To explain how the model handles semantic compositions, we study hierarchical explanation of neural network predictions. We identify non-additivity and contex…
Graph structured data has wide applicability in various domains such as physics, chemistry, biology, computer vision, and social networks, to name a few. Recently, graph neural networks (GNN) were shown to be successful in effectively representing graph structured data because of their good performance and generalizati…
Unified understanding of neural networks on group operations verified.
problem Understanding and verifying neural networks trained on group operations.
method Investigated one-hidden-layer neural networks trained on binary operation of finite groups, revealing structure and providing a compact proof of model performance.
result Verified explanation applies to a large fraction of networks trained on the symmetric group S5, providing a >=95% accuracy bound for 45% of models.
Study shows explanation disparities in machine learning models are influenced by data and model properties.
problem Disparities in post-hoc machine learning explanation methods across race and gender.
method Simulations and experiments on a real-world dataset to assess challenges to explanation disparities.
result Increased covariate shift, concept shift, and omission of covariates increase explanation disparities, especially for neural network models.
Study shows more data improves model explanations, aiding reliable knowledge extraction.
problem Challenges in deriving reliable knowledge from machine learning models due to the Rashōmon effect.
method Examined the influence of sample size on explanations from models in a Rashōmon set using SHAP.
result Explanations from <128 samples are highly variable, but agreement improves with more data.
Proposes new methods for interpreting document classification models.
problem Interpretation fragility of attention-based neural networks.
method Corpus-level and concept-based explanation methods using attention weights.
result Extracts semantically meaningful keywords and concepts for model predictions.
Issues regarding explainable AI involve four components: users, laws & regulations, explanations and algorithms. Together these components provide a context in which explanation methods can be evaluated regarding their adequacy. The goal of this chapter is to bridge the gap between expert users and lay users. Different…