Research
On-device research index

arXiv research

A locally-built, LLM-digested index of recent arXiv papers in quant finance, geometry/topology, and statistical ML — keyword search served straight from SQLite on this machine.

168,742 papers · 148 categories

Trend · papers per month

6.3%12.5%18.8%25.0% · Mar 199319922001200920172026
48 results for cluster evaluation

This paper evaluates and validates cluster results using external and internal evaluation methods.

problem Evaluating and validating the quality of clustering results.
method External evaluation using Homogeneity, Correctness, and V-measure scores; internal evaluation using Silhouette Index and Sum of Square Errors.
result Validation of the number of clusters using dendrogram and statistical frequency distribution.

This study evaluates clustering algorithms on high-dimensional data.

problem Comparing clustering algorithms on high-dimensional datasets.
method Evaluation of K-means, DBSCAN, and Spectral Clustering using PCA, t-SNE, UMAP, and multiple metrics.
result UMAP preprocessing improves clustering quality across all algorithms, with Spectral Clustering excelling.

This paper tackles deep clustering evaluation challenges in high-dimensional data.

problem Evaluation of deep clustering methods is problematic due to the curse of dimensionality and variations in embedding spaces.
method Develops a theoretical framework to highlight the ineffectiveness of internal validation measures and proposes a systematic approach to applying clustering validity indices in deep learning.
result The proposed framework reduces misguidance from improper use of clustering validity indices in deep learning.

Clustering is an essential data mining tool that aims to discover inherent cluster structure in data. For most applications, applying clustering is only appropriate when cluster structure is present. As such, the study of clusterability, which evaluates whether data possesses such structure, is an integral part of clus…

2018-08-24abs ↗pdf ↗

This paper reviews and proposes a new approach for evaluating internal cluster validation indices.

problem Selecting the best-performing unsupervised classification algorithm without external information.
method Examines and proposes a new evaluation approach for internal validation indices.
result Suggests a new evaluation approach for internal validation indices.

Determining the quality of the results obtained by clustering techniques is a key issue in unsupervised machine learning. Many authors have discussed the desirable features of good clustering algorithms. However, Jon Kleinberg established an impossibility theorem for clustering. As a consequence, a wealth of studies ha…

2019-05-14abs ↗pdf ↗

CSTS benchmarks time series clustering by evaluating correlation structures.

problem Lack of validated ground truth for objectively assessing clustering quality.
method Synthetic benchmark CSTS for evaluating correlation structures in multivariate time series data.
result CSTS enables precise diagnosis of methodological limitations in correlation-based time series clustering.

Proposes clustering as a new evaluation method for clinical knowledge embedding.

problem Traditional Link Prediction evaluation protocol loses information and harms model accuracy.
method Proposes Clustering Evaluation Protocol as an alternative.
result Experimental results show the proposed protocol can potentially replace Link Prediction.

Competency questions help experts select best clustering for energy data.

problem Ad hoc and subjective selection of clustering structures by domain experts.
method Formalize expert knowledge and requirements with competency questions.
result Competency questions improve reproducibility and evaluation of clustering applications.

Clustering is an essential data mining tool that aims to discover inherent cluster structure in data. As such, the study of clusterability, which evaluates whether data possesses such structure, is an integral part of cluster analysis. Yet, despite their central role in the theory and application of clustering, current…

2016-02-22abs ↗pdf ↗

KCoreMotif clusters large networks efficiently by exploiting k-core decomposition and motifs.

problem Efficiently clustering large networks for trust evaluation.
method Exploits k-core decomposition and motifs to perform motif-based spectral clustering on k-core subgraphs.
result The proposed algorithm is accurate and efficient for large networks.

New estimator uses clustering to improve off-policy evaluation accuracy.

problem Improving off-policy evaluation accuracy when logging and evaluation policies differ.
method Proposes an estimator that shares information across similar contexts using clustering.
result Clustering contexts improves estimation accuracy, especially in deficient information settings.

A new measure DCSI quantifies separability for density-based clustering.

problem Quantifying meaningful clusters in data sets.
method Developed a new separability measure DCSI based on separation and connectedness.
result Correctly identifies touching or overlapping classes that do not correspond to meaningful density-based clusters.

A clustering may be considered as fair on pre-specified sensitive attributes if the proportions of sensitive attribute groups in each cluster reflect that in the dataset. In this paper, we consider the task of fair clustering for scenarios involving multiple multi-valued or numeric sensitive attributes. We propose a fa…

2019-10-11abs ↗pdf ↗

This study reviews and evaluates clustering methods for single-cell RNA-seq data.

problem Identifying and characterizing novel cell types from single-cell RNA-seq data.
method Review and performance comparison of clustering methods.
result Performance comparison experiments on two datasets.

Quality assessments of models in unsupervised learning and clustering verification in particular have been a long-standing problem in the machine learning research. The lack of robust and universally applicable cluster validity scores often makes the algorithm selection and hyperparameter evaluation a tough guess. In t…

2018-03-29abs ↗pdf ↗

Cluster-DAGs improve causal discovery with prior knowledge.

problem Finding cause-effect relationships from high-dimensional data.
method Cluster-DAGs as prior knowledge framework, modified constraint-based algorithms Cluster-PC and Cluster-FCI.
result Cluster-PC and Cluster-FCI outperform baselines without prior knowledge.

Image clustering is an important but challenging task in machine learning. As in most image processing areas, the latest improvements came from models based on the deep learning approach. However, classical deep learning methods have problems to deal with spatial image transformations like scale and rotation. In this p…

2019-02-09abs ↗pdf ↗

Clustering is one of the most universal approaches for understanding complex data. A pivotal aspect of clustering analysis is quantitatively comparing clusterings; clustering comparison is the basis for many tasks such as clustering evaluation, consensus clustering, and tracking the temporal evolution of clusters. In p…

2017-06-19abs ↗pdf ↗

Bayesian Supervised Causal Clustering identifies patient subgroups for personalized decision-making.

problem Finding patient subgroups with similar characteristics for personalized decision-making.
method Bayesian Supervised Causal Clustering (BSCC) that identifies homogenous subgroups based on treatment effects.
result BSCC identifies subgroups with similar covariate profiles and treatment effects.

Minimax linkage was first introduced by Ao et al. [3] in 2004, as an alternative to standard linkage methods used in hierarchical clustering. Minimax linkage relies on distances to a prototype for each cluster; this prototype can be thought of as a representative object in the cluster, hence improving the interpretabil…

2019-06-07abs ↗pdf ↗

Efficient clustering for large datasets using a sampling-based approach.

problem Clustering high-dimensional data with a large number of clusters efficiently.
method A simple and efficient clustering method that evaluates distances of data points with a subset of cluster centers.
result Optimal solutions of the approximation are the same as in the exact solution, but more efficient at extracting clusters.

Clustering is a central approach for unsupervised learning. After clustering is applied, the most fundamental analysis is to quantitatively compare clusterings. Such comparisons are crucial for the evaluation of clustering methods as well as other tasks such as consensus clustering. It is often argued that, in order to…

2017-01-23abs ↗pdf ↗

This study evaluates cluster search algorithms using Gaussian mixture models.

problem Determining the optimal number of clusters in data sets generated by Gaussian mixture models.
method Examined centroid- and model-based cluster search algorithms in various cases.
result Model-based algorithms are more robust to cluster overlap and covariance type than centroid-based methods.

A Python tool generates synthetic data for cluster analysis from high-level descriptions.

problem Creating synthetic data for cluster analysis is laborious and requires detailed geometric parameters.
method Proposes natural language-based synthetic data generation and implements it in a Python package.
result Makes it easy to set up interpretable and reproducible benchmarks for cluster analysis.

New criterion selects optimal number of clusters based on stability.

problem Challenges in selecting optimal number of clusters in non-parametric clustering.
method Proposes a stability-based validation criterion combining between-cluster and within-cluster stability.
result Empirically demonstrates effectiveness in selecting optimal number of clusters.

A new medoid-based Silhouette method selects optimal cluster numbers efficiently.

problem Difficulty in evaluating clustering results and choosing the right number of clusters.
method Developed a medoid-based Silhouette variant, analyzed its properties, and provided fast optimization methods.
result A 10464x speedup in choosing optimal cluster numbers compared to original PAMMEDSIL.

In this paper we propose a measure of clustering quality or accuracy that is appropriate in situations where it is desirable to evaluate a clustering algorithm by somehow comparing the clusters it produces with ``ground truth' consisting of classes assigned to the patterns by manual means or some other means in whose v…

2012-12-12abs ↗pdf ↗

The paper proposes a new method to evaluate LLM agent responses using ECDF clustering.

problem The standard evaluation of LLM agent responses via majority voting obscures response quality and distribution.
method The paper introduces a novel evaluation framework based on ECDF of cosine similarities and clustering of ECDFs using distances and kk-medoids algorithm.
result ECDF clustering reveals interpretable group structures in LLM responses, offering insights into agent settings.