MultiwayPAM clusters LLM-as-a-Judge scores to reveal evaluator bias.
problem Revealing bias in LLM evaluations of text quality.
method Tensor clustering with MultiwayPAM method.
result Medoids reveal cluster membership of questions, answerers, and evaluators.
New methods correct bias in LLM-as-a-Judge evaluations, but reliability depends on judge quality and model calibration.
problem Systematic bias in LLM-as-a-Judge evaluations using naive estimators.
method Analytical results, simulations, and real-data case study to diagnose reliability of corrected estimates.
result Corrected estimates, especially shared-calibration comparisons, can be unreliable under certain conditions.
Paper improves uncertainty estimation in LLM-as-a-judge systems.
problem Improving uncertainty estimation in LLM-as-a-judge frameworks.
method Generalised probabilistic modelling and improved uncertainty estimates.
result Proposed uncertainty estimates significantly improve system efficiency.
AURA: Adaptive Uncertainty-aware Refinement for LLM-as-a-Judge Auditing
problem Auditing LLM-as-a-Judge decisions
method Adaptive uncertainty-aware refinement
result Human-consistent signal learning and evidence propagation
LLM evaluation suffers from systematic biases and lacks reliable positive judgments.
problem LLM evaluation suffers from systematic biases and lacks reliable positive judgments.
method Formulate LLM evaluation as a positive-unlabelled learning problem and propose a geometric auditing framework based on Partial Optimal Transport.
result Improved alignment with human preferences, increased robustness to presentation biases, and interpretable confidence estimates.
Corrects bias in LLM-as-a-judge evaluations using adaptive calibration.
problem Bias in LLM evaluations due to imperfect sensitivity and specificity.
method Plug-in framework with confidence intervals accounting for test and calibration dataset uncertainties.
result LML-based evaluation yields more reliable estimates than human-only evaluation.
Unified framework to bridge human and LLM judgments.
problem Systematic discrepancies between human and LLM evaluations.
method Latent human preference score and linear transformations of covariates.
result Higher agreement with human ratings and exposure of systematic gaps.
The paper introduces Relative Bias to quantify LLM bias systematically.
problem Quantifying bias in LLMs is challenging due to ambiguity and rapid model emergence.
method Relative Bias framework using Embedding Transformation and LLM-as-a-Judge methodologies.
result The two scoring methods show strong alignment, providing a systematic approach.
RACER optimizes LLM-as-judge accuracy with dynamic reasoning selection.
problem Balancing reasoning accuracy with computational cost in LLM-as-judge settings.
method Formulates routing as a constrained distributionally robust optimization problem, accounting for distribution shift via KL-divergence uncertainty set.
result RACER achieves superior accuracy-cost trade-offs under distribution shift.
Study compares DSPy teleprompter algorithms for aligning LLM evaluations with human annotations.
problem Aligning LLM evaluation metrics with human annotations.
method Comparative analysis of five teleprompter algorithms within the DSPy framework.
result Certain teleprompters outperform others in detecting hallucinations.
New method for LLMs to learn reasoning by optimizing latent variables.
problem Teaching LLMs to generate logical justifications for answers.
method Formalized reasoning as latent variable model, derived FEM objective, designed sampling schemes.
result Prompt Posterior Sampling (PPS) outperforms other schemes in learning to reason.
A new framework evaluates LLMs by considering judge reliability.
problem Evaluating LLMs without ground truth labels can lead to biased results.
method Introduces judge-specific discrimination parameters and estimates model quality and judge reliability.
result Improves agreement with human preferences and produces calibrated uncertainty quantification.
CARE improves LLM aggregation by accounting for shared confounders.
problem LLM judges' correlated errors due to shared latent confounders.
method CARE explicitly models judges' scores as true quality and confounders.
result CARE reduces aggregation error by up to 26.8% across various benchmarks.
Framework assesses autograders' reliability and biases.
problem Mixed reliability and biases in autograders for LLM evaluation.
method Bayesian GLMs to model evaluation outcomes.
result Explicit quantification of scoring differences and biases.
PromptEval estimates LLM performance across many prompts, improving reproducibility.
problem Limited prompt templates affect LLM benchmark reproducibility.
method Estimates performance distribution across many prompts using borrowed strength.
result PromptEval accurately estimates performance quantiles with practical budget.
Dropping a tiny fraction of preferences can significantly alter the rankings of top LLMs.
problem Robustness of LLM ranking systems to small changes in preference data.
method A computational method based on the Bradley-Terry model to evaluate robustness.
result Top LLM rankings can be highly sensitive to the removal of a small fraction of preferences.
New method improves LLM judge accuracy by accounting for dependencies in aggregated binary labels.
problem Classical label aggregation methods fail to account for dependencies among LLM judges, leading to miscalibrated predictions.
method Dependence-aware models based on Ising graphical models and latent factors.
result The proposed method outperforms classical methods on real-world datasets, reducing excess risk.
Synthetic data can be used to ask more questions and accelerate discovery with provable validity guarantees.
problem Valid inference with synthetic data
method Task exchangeability
result Provable validity guarantees for synthetic data inference
FinReflectKG builds a comprehensive financial knowledge graph from SEC filings, improving extraction quality.
problem Lack of large-scale, open-source financial knowledge graph datasets.
method Intelligent document parsing, table-aware chunking, schema-guided iterative extraction, reflection-driven feedback loop.
result Reflection-agent-based mode achieves best balance of efficiency, accuracy, and reliability.
New models can't beat existing ones, so debiasing methods only slightly reduce needed labels.
problem Limiting scalability in model evaluation due to self-preferencing biases.
method Study of debiasing methods using a few high-quality labels to reduce model judgments.
result Debiasing methods can't decrease required ground truth labels by more than half when the judge is no more accurate than the model.
Meta-Router optimizes LLM selection using gold-standard and preference-based data.
problem Training a high-quality LLM router with combined data sources is challenging due to bias and scarcity.
method Developed an integrative causal router training framework to correct bias and improve routing accuracy.
result Our approach delivers more accurate routing and improves the trade-off between cost and quality.
LLMs struggle with zero-shot annotation tasks due to model-internalized priors.
problem Impact of model-internalized priors on LLM performance in zero-shot annotation tasks.
method Investigated three dimensions: familiarity, decision stickiness, and susceptibility to misaligned task definitions.
result Nearly two-thirds of zero-shot errors are resistant to correction, with a rescue rate of 34.8%. Definition-Specific Familiarity (DSF) shows a positive association with model performance.
New method ensures consistent inference across different tensor parallel sizes for large language models.
problem Non-deterministic inference in large language models due to inconsistent reduction orders across GPUs.
method Tree-Based Invariant Kernels (TBIK) that align intra- and inter-GPU reduction orders through a unified hierarchical binary tree structure.
result Bit-wise identical results across different tensor parallel sizes for RL training.
Optimizes budgeted evaluations of LLMs by allocating queries to judges efficiently.
problem Evaluating LLMs with heterogeneous judges and varying costs and reliability.
method Formalizes and analyzes budgeted heteroskedastic multi-judge estimation, proposing EST-IVWE for practical implementation.
result EST-IVWE matches the oracle IVWE rate up to lower-order terms in the budget and is instance-optimal.
This paper proposes a method to use LLMs as auxiliary evaluators in place of human judges.
problem The need for cost-effective and scalable evaluation of AI systems.
method Formulates a two-stage sampling design with LLM evaluations and human ratings, using a doubly robust estimator.
result Proposes a method to determine optimal sample sizes for human and LLM ratings.