Research
On-device research index

arXiv research

A locally-built, LLM-digested index of recent arXiv papers in quant finance, geometry/topology, and statistical ML — keyword search served straight from SQLite on this machine.

168,742 papers · 148 categories

Trend · papers per month

6.3%12.5%18.8%25.0% · Mar 199319922001200920172026
48 results for bias evaluation

Recommendation systems have been integrated into the majority of large online systems to filter and rank information according to user profiles. It thus influences the way users interact with the system and, as a consequence, bias the evaluation of the performance of a recommendation algorithm computed using historical…

2015-06-12abs ↗pdf ↗

Study improves unbiased recommender learning by addressing missing-reward bias.

problem Data bias caused by missing-reward observations in recommender systems.
method Proposes a novel estimator using propensity scores to mitigate both position and reward bias.
result The proposed estimator outperforms other methods, even with increased reward observation bias.

The paper proposes a method to evaluate ML models for subjective inference, focusing on sentence toxicity.

problem Bias in ML models for subjective inference, especially in real-life applications.
method Proposes a list of specifications to evaluate ML models for subjective inference, illustrated with a sentence toxicity example.
result Demonstrates the importance of considering subjectivity and bias in evaluating ML models.

Corrects bias in LLM-as-a-judge evaluations using adaptive calibration.

problem Bias in LLM evaluations due to imperfect sensitivity and specificity.
method Plug-in framework with confidence intervals accounting for test and calibration dataset uncertainties.
result LML-based evaluation yields more reliable estimates than human-only evaluation.

The paper tackles sampling bias in credit scoring models and proposes methods to improve their training and evaluation.

problem Sampling bias in credit scoring models leads to an incomplete representation of the borrower population.
method Bias-aware self-learning framework and Bayesian evaluation method to correct for bias.
result Bayesian evaluation outperforms standard accuracy measures in predicting future performance.

Paper reduces variance in infinite horizon off-policy evaluation with bias reduction.

problem High variance in infinite horizon off-policy evaluation.
method Doubly robust augmentation of Liu et al. (2018a) method using learned value function.
result Significant reduction in bias with higher accuracy when either density ratio or value function is accurate.

We model and correct bias in sequential evaluation, improving ranking accuracy.

problem Sequential evaluation bias in online, irrevocable scoring.
method Modeling the rating process, posing as statistical inference, proposing an online algorithm.
result Near-linear time, online algorithm with guarantees in ranking metrics, information theoretically optimal.

This paper evaluates debiasing methods on word embeddings to reduce religious bias.

problem Social biases persist in word embeddings, potentially amplifying them in AI applications.
method Investigates and evaluates three multiclass debiasing techniques on three word embeddings.
result ConceptorDebiasing is the most effective method, reducing religious bias by 82-96%.

Look-Ahead-Bench evaluates financial LLMs for lookahead bias, revealing significant differences in model performance.

problem Measuring and mitigating lookahead bias in financial LLMs.
method Standardized benchmark evaluating model behavior in practical financial scenarios, analyzing performance decay across market regimes.
result Standard LLMs exhibit significant lookahead bias, while Pitinf models show improved generalization and reasoning abilities.

The study addresses biases in evaluating molecular optimization methods and proposes methods to reduce these biases.

problem Biases in in silico evaluation of molecular optimization methods.
method Discussion and empirical investigation of bias reduction methods for predictor misspecification and sample reuse.
result Empirical investigation of bias reduction methods for predictor misspecification and sample reuse.

Study evaluates bias mitigation methods in deep learning, finds they often exploit hidden biases.

problem Deep learning systems learn biases, affecting performance on minority groups.
method Improved evaluation protocol, new dataset, robustness across different tuning distributions.
result Bias mitigation methods often exploit hidden biases, are not robust to multiple forms of bias, and are sensitive to tuning set choice.

We evaluate the folk wisdom that algorithmic decision rules trained on data produced by biased human decision-makers necessarily reflect this bias. We consider a setting where training labels are only generated if a biased decision-maker takes a particular action, and so "biased" training data arise due to discriminato…

2019-09-18abs ↗pdf ↗

Recommendation systems have been integrated into the majority of large online systems. They tailor those systems to individual users by filtering and ranking information according to user profiles. This adaptation process influences the way users interact with the system and, as a consequence, increases the difficulty …

2014-07-03abs ↗pdf ↗

The paper evaluates biased methods for alpha-divergence minimization.

problem The impact of bias on solutions found for alpha-divergence minimization.
method Empirical evaluation of biased methods for alpha-divergence minimization, focusing on bias effects and dimensionality.
result Solutions are biased towards KL-divergence minimizers and require impractical computation in high dimensions to minimize alpha-divergence.

New methods correct bias in LLM-as-a-Judge evaluations, but reliability depends on judge quality and model calibration.

problem Systematic bias in LLM-as-a-Judge evaluations using naive estimators.
method Analytical results, simulations, and real-data case study to diagnose reliability of corrected estimates.
result Corrected estimates, especially shared-calibration comparisons, can be unreliable under certain conditions.

New framework for interpreting disaggregated fairness evaluations using causal models.

problem Misinterpretation of disaggregated fairness evaluations due to data representativeness and selection bias.
method Causal graphical models to characterize fairness properties and metric stability under different data generating processes.
result Disaggregated evaluations are unreliable without explicit assumptions regarding bias mechanisms.

New method reduces bias in estimating causal effects from discretized variables.

problem Bias in estimating causal effects from discretized continuous variables.
method Proposes a bias-reduced functional that evaluates outcome regression at within-bin conditional means.
result Demonstrates substantial bias reduction and near-nominal confidence interval coverage.

Over the last decade there has been increasing concern about the biases embodied in traditional evaluation methods for Natural Language Processing/Learning, particularly methods borrowed from Information Retrieval. Without knowledge of the Bias and Prevalence of the contingency being tested, or equivalently the expecta…

2015-04-03abs ↗pdf ↗

Study evaluates if LLMs have company-specific biases in financial sentiment analysis.

problem Evaluating if large language models exhibit company-specific biases in financial sentiment analysis.
method Comparing sentiment scores with and without company names, constructing economic models, and empirical analysis.
result LLMs show company-specific biases in sentiment analysis, impacting investor behavior and stock prices.

New causal models perform poorly when evaluated on biased training sets.

problem Sample selection bias affects the evaluation of causal models' prediction performance.
method Re-evaluated prediction performance of causal models on a genetic perturbation data set, proposing a less-biased evaluation set.
result Causal models have similar or worse performance when evaluated on a less-biased set compared to standard association-based estimators.

FinReflectKG - EvalBench benchmarks financial KG extraction from SEC 10-K filings.

problem Lack of universal benchmark and evaluation framework for financial KG construction.
method Agentic and holistic evaluation principles, deterministic commit-then-justify judging protocol, binary and ordinal evaluations.
result Reflection-based extraction outperforms single-pass extraction in comprehensiveness, precision, and relevance.

This paper examines fairness and arbitrariness in bias mitigation methods.

problem Understanding how different bias mitigation strategies affect individual predictions and whether they introduce arbitrariness.
method FRAME framework to evaluate bias mitigation through five dimensions: Impact Size, Change Direction, Decision Rates, Affected Subpopulations, and Neglected Subpopulations.
result Significant differences in the behaviors of debiasing methods were exhibited, highlighting the limitations of current fairness criteria and the inherent arbitrariness in the debiasing process.

PAC-MCTS addresses biased search in LLM-guided planning by dynamically pruning.

problem Systematic biases in LLMs lead to inefficient and unsafe search in deep planning tasks.
method Formulates node expansion as BAI under bounded bias, derives sample complexity bounds, and proposes PAC-MCTS for dynamic confidence bounds.
result PAC-MCTS improves robustness and efficiency by up to 78% fewer API evaluations and 3x higher sample efficiency.

New Hessian estimators for Riemannian manifolds with reduced bias.

problem Estimating Hessians on Riemannian manifolds with reduced bias and computational efficiency.
method Introducing new stochastic zeroth-order Hessian estimators using O(1)O(1) function evaluations.
result Achieved a bias bound of order O(γδ2)O(γδ^2) for analytic real-valued functions.

Active testing reduces label costs for efficient model evaluation.

problem Real-world applications require expensive test labels, disconnecting from existing model evaluation methods.
method Derives acquisition strategies to select test points efficiently, addressing label bias and variance.
result Active testing improves model evaluation efficiency without sacrificing accuracy.

Recency Bias selects recent uncertain samples for faster, more accurate deep learning.

problem Improving the accuracy of deep neural networks through better mini-batch selection.
method Uses historical label predictions to evaluate predictive uncertainty and selects samples proportionally.
result Reduces test error by up to 20.97% compared to existing methods in the same training time.

The paper assesses fairness in AI for financial services, using statistical methods.

problem Unintentional bias and insufficient model validation in AI applications.
method Statistical methods for imbalanced data treatment and bias mitigation.
result Fairness evaluation metrics applied to a credit card default payment example.

The paper detects and identifies bias in data using a counterfactual approach.

problem Detecting and identifying bias in data, especially in medical image classification.
method A global explanation framework using the counterfactual approach to identify bias causing artifacts.
result Black frames significantly influence Convolutional Neural Network's prediction, changing benign to malignant.

DOLCE improves off-policy evaluation and learning by decomposing effects.

problem Bias in off-policy evaluation and learning due to policy mismatch.
method Uses lagged contexts and a moment-based training procedure to decompose and cancel bias.
result DOLCE achieves substantial improvements in off-policy evaluation and learning.

CONE evaluates treatment assignment functions using networked observational data to mitigate hidden confounding bias.

problem Evaluate treatment assignment functions using networked observational data with hidden confounders.
method CONE framework that learns partial representations of latent confounders and combines them for counterfactual evaluation.
result Network information mitigates hidden confounding bias in counterfactual evaluation.

The paper introduces Relative Bias to quantify LLM bias systematically.

problem Quantifying bias in LLMs is challenging due to ambiguity and rapid model emergence.
method Relative Bias framework using Embedding Transformation and LLM-as-a-Judge methodologies.
result The two scoring methods show strong alignment, providing a systematic approach.