Research
On-device research index

arXiv research

A locally-built, LLM-digested index of recent arXiv papers in quant finance, geometry/topology, and statistical ML — keyword search served straight from SQLite on this machine.

168,742 papers · 148 categories

Trend · papers per month

84169253337 · Jun 202019922001200920172026
48 results for Label Quality

Paper tackles noisy annotations by considering workers' attention levels.

problem Noisy annotations from workers with varying expertise.
method Proposes a probabilistic model that incorporates workers' attention for accurate label quality estimation.
result Improves aggregated labels by quantifying the relationship between workers' attention and label quality.

FOCUS addresses label quality disparity in FL for healthcare applications.

problem Label quality disparity in federated learning for healthcare applications.
method FOCUS maintains a small set of benchmark samples and computes the mutual cross-entropy between local and benchmark datasets to quantify label credibility. It then adjusts client weights based on credibility values.
result FOCUS effectively reduces the impact of noisy labels from clients, improving model performance.

The paper investigates how dataset quality and heterogeneity affect model confidence in machine learning.

problem Understanding how dataset quality and heterogeneity impact model confidence in machine learning.
method The study uses theoretical explanations and experimental demonstrations to investigate the effects of dataset size, label noise, and class heterogeneity on model confidence.
result Label noise reduces model confidence, while reduced dataset size increases it, and class heterogeneity leads to inconsistent confidence across classes.

In the recent years, we have witnessed the development of multi-label classification methods which utilize the structure of the label space in a divide and conquer approach to improve classification performance and allow large data sets to be classified efficiently. Yet most of the available data sets have been provide…

2017-04-27abs ↗pdf ↗

Generative models have made immense progress in recent years, particularly in their ability to generate high quality images. However, that quality has been difficult to evaluate rigorously, with evaluation dominated by heuristic approaches that do not correlate well with human judgment, such as the Inception Score and …

2019-11-30abs ↗pdf ↗

Majority of state-of-the-art deep learning methods are discriminative approaches, which model the conditional distribution of labels given inputs features. The success of such approaches heavily depends on high-quality labeled instances, which are not easy to obtain, especially as the number of candidate classes increa…

2019-04-02abs ↗pdf ↗

Improved deep learning models with less labelled data and better label quality.

problem High costs and effort in training deep neural networks with label errors.
method Iterative label improvement using confidence-based filtering and dataset partitioning.
result Significant improvement in label quality and model accuracy.

NeuCrowd creates high-quality samples from crowdsourced labels to improve representation learning.

problem Limited and inconsistent crowdsourced labels for representation learning.
method Unified framework that generates high-quality n-tuplet samples and learns a neural sampling network.
result NeuCrowd outperforms state-of-the-art baselines in prediction accuracy and AUC.

GCNs help in diagnosing label scarcity and feature quality on graphs.

problem Understanding when GCNs improve node classification.
method Simulated label scarcity, feature ablation, and per-class analysis.
result GCNs provide largest gains under extreme label scarcity, matching original performance with noisy features, but hurt when homophily is low and features are strong.

As a new approach to train generative models, \emph{generative adversarial networks} (GANs) have achieved considerable success in image generation. This framework has also recently been applied to data with graph structures. We propose labeled-graph generative adversarial networks (LGGAN) to train deep generative model…

2019-06-07abs ↗pdf ↗

Study shows resampling labels improves classifier performance in noisy data.

problem Balancing sample size vs label reliability in noisy data.
method Comparing different validation strategies and analyzing MNIST database with varying noise levels.
result Classifier performance declines with high incorrect labels, highlighting the importance of resampling.

The paper proposes a method to detect and filter noisy or mislabeled data using pointwise mutual information.

problem Detecting and filtering noisy or mislabeled data in deep learning models.
method A mutual information-based framework quantifying statistical dependencies between inputs and labels.
result The method effectively filters low-quality samples, improving classification accuracy by up to 15%.

Class labels have been empirically shown useful in improving the sample quality of generative adversarial nets (GANs). In this paper, we mathematically study the properties of the current variants of GANs that make use of class label information. With class aware gradient and cross-entropy decomposition, we reveal how …

2017-03-06abs ↗pdf ↗

Learning exists in the context of data, yet notions of confidence typically focus on model predictions, not label quality. Confident learning (CL) is an alternative approach which focuses instead on label quality by characterizing and identifying label errors in datasets, based on the principles of pruning noisy data, …

2019-10-31abs ↗pdf ↗

New measure assesses time series pre-training data quality without labels.

problem Challenges in collecting diverse pre-training datasets for time series classification.
method Contrastive-learning-based foundation model and contrastive accuracy measure.
result Contrastive accuracy correlates with model performance on downstream tasks.

SMART is an open source web application designed to help data scientists and research teams efficiently build labeled training data sets for supervised machine learning tasks. SMART provides users with an intuitive interface for creating labeled data sets, supports active learning to help reduce the required amount of …

2018-12-11abs ↗pdf ↗

Although shill bidding is a common auction fraud, it is however very tough to detect. Due to the unavailability and lack of training data, in this study, we build a high-quality labeled shill bidding dataset based on recently collected auctions from eBay. Labeling shill biding instances with multidimensional features i…

2018-08-22abs ↗pdf ↗

Crowdsourcing utilizes the wisdom of crowds for collective classification via information (e.g., labels of an item) provided by labelers. Current crowdsourcing algorithms are mainly unsupervised methods that are unaware of the quality of crowdsourced data. In this paper, we propose a supervised collective classificatio…

2015-07-23abs ↗pdf ↗

There is a rapidly increasing interest in crowdsourcing for data labeling. By crowdsourcing, a large number of labels can be often quickly gathered at low cost. However, the labels provided by the crowdsourcing workers are usually not of high quality. In this paper, we propose a minimax conditional entropy principle to…

2015-03-25abs ↗pdf ↗

The paper proposes a method to assess and improve data quality using GBDT training dynamics.

problem Improving data quality in datasets with noisy labels and varying contributions.
method Metrics computed from training dynamics of Gradient Boosting Decision Trees (GBDTs).
result The method achieved the best results compared to other approaches.

CheXpert++ improves CheXpert's accuracy and usability for medical radiology reports.

problem Infeasibility of obtaining ground truth labels for medical data.
method BERT-based approximation of CheXpert, addressing speed, differentiability, and probabilistic output.
result Achieves 99.81% parity with CheXpert, significantly faster, differentiable, and probabilistic.

In many classification problems unlabelled data is abundant and a subset can be chosen for labelling. This defines the context of active learning (AL), where methods systematically select that subset, to improve a classifier by retraining. Given a classification problem, and a classifier trained on a small number of la…

2014-07-30abs ↗pdf ↗

Deep learning for supervised learning has achieved astonishing performance in various machine learning applications. However, annotated data is expensive and rare. In practice, only a small portion of data samples are annotated. Pseudo-ensembling-based approaches have achieved state-of-the-art results in computer visio…

2019-02-11abs ↗pdf ↗

New methods for handling time-varying label noise in time series classification.

problem Temporal label noise in time series classification tasks.
method Proposed methods to estimate temporal label noise function directly from data.
result Our methods lead to state-of-the-art performance under diverse types of temporal label noise.