Research
On-device research index

arXiv research

A locally-built, LLM-digested index of recent arXiv papers in quant finance, geometry/topology, and statistical ML — keyword search served straight from SQLite on this machine.

168,695 papers · 148 categories

Trend · papers per month

3917821,1721,563 · Jun 202019922001200920172026
48 results for Human Learning

When machine predictors can achieve higher performance than the human decision-makers they support, improving the performance of human decision-makers is often conflated with improving machine accuracy. Here we propose a framework to directly support human decision-making, in which the role of machines is to reframe pr…

2019-05-29abs ↗pdf ↗

This paper argues for more realistic human models in RL.

problem Current RL models oversimplify human feedback, ignoring personal, contextual, and dynamic aspects.
method Calls for interdisciplinary research on human feedback in RL.
result Realistic human models are needed for robust human-in-the-loop RL systems.

IDT learns human preferences from uncertain decisions, even when humans are suboptimal.

problem Learning human preferences from uncertain and suboptimal decisions.
method Inverse decision theory (IDT) framework, statistical analysis of IDT, characterizing sample complexity.
result Learning preferences is easier when decisions are more uncertain, even if humans are suboptimal.

This research integrates human interaction into reinforcement learning to improve sample efficiency and real-time learning.

problem Current reinforcement learning requires thousands of samples to converge, and is prone to catastrophic failures.
method Integrates human interaction modalities (demonstrations, interventions, evaluations) into the reinforcement learning loop.
result Human interaction accelerates learning and improves sample efficiency.

This work compares human feedback methods for reward learning in bandits.

problem Understanding how human feedback affects the performance of reward learning methods.
method Theoretical comparison of human feedback approaches in offline contextual bandits.
result Human bias and uncertainty in feedback modeling impact the theoretical guarantees of reward learning methods.

Paper proposes a modified uncertainty sampling method to speed up preference learning from noisy humans.

problem Learning preferences from humans with limited queries and noisy responses.
method Modified uncertainty sampling using expected output value to speed up preference learning.
result The modified method outperforms the baseline uncertainty sampling in preference learning.

Bayesian nonparametric models, such as Gaussian processes, provide a compelling framework for automatic statistical modelling: these models have a high degree of flexibility, and automatically calibrated complexity. However, automating human expertise remains elusive; for example, Gaussian processes with standard kerne…

2015-10-26abs ↗pdf ↗

This thesis tackles learning reward functions from human comparative feedback.

problem Designing reward functions for complex tasks is challenging and humans often provide suboptimal demonstrations.
method Proposes learning reward functions from comparative feedback (pairwise comparisons, best-of-many choices, rankings, scaled comparisons) and active learning techniques.
result Demonstrates the effectiveness of learning reward functions from comparative feedback in various domains.

Conformal prediction sets improve human decision making by quantifying model uncertainty.

problem Humans signal uncertainty and offer alternatives when unsure, but machine learning models often lack this feature.
method Conducted a randomized controlled trial with human subjects given conformal prediction sets.
result Human accuracy improves when given conformal prediction sets compared to fixed-size prediction sets.

While we would like agents that can coordinate with humans, current algorithms such as self-play and population-based training create agents that can coordinate with themselves. Agents that assume their partner to be optimal or similar to them can converge to coordination protocols that fail to understand and be unders…

2019-10-13abs ↗pdf ↗

Paper tackles RLHF with DCPPO method, proving near-optimal suboptimality.

problem Challenges in offline RLHF with limited human feedback and bounded rationality.
method DCPPO method involving three stages: MLE, reward function recovery, and pessimistic value iteration.
result DCPPO's suboptimality almost matches classical pessimistic offline RL in terms of distribution shift and dimension.

PILAF optimizes reward models from human feedback for better policy alignment.

problem Creating accurate reward models from human feedback for policy optimization.
method Policy-Interpolated Learning for Aligned Feedback (PILAF) that explicitly aligns preference learning with maximizing underlying oracle reward.
result PILAF is optimal from both optimization and statistical perspectives, demonstrating strong performance in RLHF settings.

Dual active learning improves RLHF by selecting optimal conversations and teachers.

problem Efficiently aligning LLMs with human preferences using RLHF from feedback.
method Offline RL for conversation and teacher selection, dual active reward learning, pessimistic RL.
result The proposed algorithm achieves minimal generalized variance and outperforms state-of-the-arts.

Learning preferences implicit in the choices humans make is a well studied problem in both economics and computer science. However, most work makes the assumption that humans are acting (noisily) optimally with respect to their preferences. Such approaches can fail when people are themselves learning about what they wa…

2019-01-24abs ↗pdf ↗

Study models human investors' sub-rational behavior in financial markets.

problem Lack of a comprehensive model for human sub-rationality in financial markets.
method Flexible reinforcement learning model incorporating five human sub-rational aspects.
result Model accurately reproduces human behavior and reveals insights into market dynamics.

Autonomous agents trained via reinforcement learning present numerous safety concerns: reward hacking, negative side effects, and unsafe exploration, among others. In the context of near-future autonomous agents, operating in environments where humans understand the existing dangers, human involvement in the learning p…

2019-02-18abs ↗pdf ↗

Large-scale public datasets have been shown to benefit research in multiple areas of modern artificial intelligence. For decision-making research that requires human data, high-quality datasets serve as important benchmarks to facilitate the development of new methods by providing a common reproducible standard. Many h…

2019-03-15abs ↗pdf ↗

RLHF fails when humans only partially observe, leading to inflated or overjustified feedback.

problem Failure of reinforcement learning from human feedback in partially observable environments.
method Formal definition of failure cases, modeling human as Boltzmann rational, analyzing information provided by feedback.
result RLHF can deceptively inflate or overjustify feedback when humans have partial observations.

The paper tackles AI advice giving by considering adherence levels and defer options.

problem Inadequate consideration of human adherence to AI recommendations.
method Sequential decision-making model that considers adherence levels and incorporates a defer option.
result Specialized learning algorithms provide better convergence and empirical performance.

Deep RL mimics human driving for collision avoidance in self-driving cars.

problem Developing human-like driving policies for autonomous vehicles in mixed traffic environments.
method Model-free, deep reinforcement learning approach using a combination of rule-based and expert-driven data.
result Demonstrated human-like driving policies through Gaussian process modeling of track position and speed distributions.

Generative classifiers show surprising human-like performance.

problem Comparing generative and discriminative models for object recognition.
method Built on recent advances in generative modeling to create classifiers and compared them to discriminative models.
result Generative classifiers outperform discriminative models in several key areas, including shape bias and out-of-distribution accuracy.

We present a novel human-aware navigation approach, where the robot learns to mimic humans to navigate safely in crowds. The presented model, referred to as DeepMoTIon, is trained with pedestrian surveillance data to predict human velocity in the environment. The robot processes LiDAR scans via the trained network to n…

2018-03-09abs ↗pdf ↗

Unified LP framework for offline reward learning from human demonstrations and feedback.

problem Reward learning from human demonstrations and feedback with robustness and sample efficiency.
method A novel linear programming framework for offline reward learning.
result Unified LP framework achieves better performance compared to MLE.

Have you ever looked at a machine learning classification model and thought, I could have made that? Well, that is what we test in this project, comparing XGBoost trained on human engineered features to training directly on data. The human engineered features do not outperform XGBoost trained di- rectly on the data, bu…

2016-09-04abs ↗pdf ↗

To widen their accessibility and increase their utility, intelligent agents must be able to learn complex behaviors as specified by (non-expert) human users. Moreover, they will need to learn these behaviors within a reasonable amount of time while efficiently leveraging the sparse feedback a human trainer is capable o…

2019-02-12abs ↗pdf ↗

Paper explores limits and possibilities of aligning LLMs with human preferences.

problem Aligning LLMs with diverse human preferences to ensure fairness and informed outcomes.
method Analysis of probabilistic representation of human preferences and preservation of diverse preferences.
result LLMs can't fully align with human preferences using reward-based approaches due to Condorcet cycles, but mixed strategies are statistically possible.

What makes a task relatively more or less difficult for a machine compared to a human? Much AI/ML research has focused on expanding the range of tasks that machines can do, with a focus on whether machines can beat humans. Allowing for differences in scale, we can seek interesting (anomalous) pairs of tasks T, T'. We d…

2019-10-08abs ↗pdf ↗

Paper proposes a new RLHF framework for human preference learning.

problem Handling dependent online human preference outcomes with dynamic contexts.
method Two-stage algorithm with εε-greedy followed by exploitation; anti-concentration inequalities and matrix martingale concentration techniques.
result Our method achieves optimal regret bound and asymptotic normality of estimators.

Human decision-making underlies all economic behavior. For the past four decades, human decision-making under uncertainty has continued to be explained by theoretical models based on prospect theory, a framework that was awarded the Nobel Prize in Economic Sciences. However, theoretical models of this kind have develop…

2019-05-22abs ↗pdf ↗

The paper tackles learning from imperfect human feedback, especially in dueling bandit problems.

problem Learning from human feedback that can be irrational or imperfect.
method Developed a Robustified Stochastic Mirror Descent for Imperfect Dueling (RoSMID) algorithm.
result Achieved nearly optimal regret for dueling bandit problems under imperfect human feedback.