New concept of within-group fairness improves AI fairness without sacrificing accuracy.
problem Fairness issues in AI models treating individuals in the same sensitive group unfairly.
method Introducing within-group fairness, proposing mathematical definitions, and developing learning algorithms.
result Improves within-group fairness without sacrificing accuracy and between-group fairness.
Study develops a new method for creating fair models.
problem Ensuring equal outcomes for different protected groups.
method Introduces a new group-fair constraint based on transport maps.
result Develops a novel algorithm FTM for training group-fair models.
Unified approach for fair classification with overlapping groups.
problem Ensuring fairness across multiple overlapping groups in prediction problems.
method Probabilistic population analysis leading to Bayes-optimal classifier, unifying existing methods.
result Outperforms baselines in fairness-performance tradeoff on real datasets.
Proposes FACT, a diagnostic for understanding group fairness trade-offs.
problem Group fairness notions often conflict with each other, requiring a cost in model performance.
method Characterizes trade-offs via the fairness-confusion tensor and optimizes accuracy and fairness objectives.
result Demonstrates the use of FACT on synthetic and real datasets to understand accuracy-fairness trade-offs.
Fair Mixup improves fairness in classifiers by interpolating between groups.
problem Ensuring fairness in classifiers during training and evaluation.
method Fair Mixup uses interpolation of samples between groups to enforce fairness constraints.
result Fair Mixup ensures better generalization of fairness in various benchmarks.
The paper connects counterfactual fairness to robust prediction and group fairness using causal context.
problem The challenge of ensuring fairness in AI systems when counterfactuals cannot be directly observed.
method Using causal context to bridge counterfactual fairness, robust prediction, and group fairness.
result Counterfactual fairness is equivalent to group fairness metrics in specific contexts.
Paper tackles underranking in group-fair ranking systems, proving a trade-off and presenting an algorithm.
problem Underranking in group-fair ranking systems can worsen social and economic inequalities.
method Formulated underranking as a new problem, proved a lower bound, and presented a fair ranking algorithm.
result Algorithm achieves best of underranking and group fairness, confirming theoretical trade-off.
Algorithm samples fair rankings to ensure individual fairness while maintaining group fairness.
problem Fair ranking tasks with group fairness constraints and uncertainty in item utilities.
method Efficient algorithm that samples rankings from an individually-fair distribution ensuring group fairness.
result Expected utility of output ranking is at least α times optimal fair solution, where α depends on utilities and constraints.
Whereas previous post-processing approaches for increasing the fairness of predictions of biased classifiers address only group fairness, we propose a method for increasing both individual and group fairness. Our novel framework includes an individual bias detector used to prioritize data samples in a bias mitigation a…
Improves group fairness in tensor completion by augmenting tensors with balanced entities.
problem Preventing discrimination in tensor decomposition based on social grounds.
method STAFF (Sparse Tensor Augmentation For Fairness) which augments tensors with balanced entities to mitigate imbalance and bias.
result Consistently shows the best trade-off between completion error and group fairness, reducing errors by 36% and 59% respectively.
The paper clusters group fairness metrics and visualizes them using PCA.
problem Measuring discrimination against socio-demographic groups using multiple metrics.
method Empirical observation and PCA visualization of fairness metrics.
result Group fairness metrics cluster into two or three main clusters.
We consider the problem of improving fairness when one lacks access to a dataset labeled with protected groups, making it difficult to take advantage of strategies that can improve fairness but require protected group labels, either at training or runtime. To address this, we investigate improving fairness metrics for …
New methods ensure fairness in noisy protected groups.
problem Noisy or biased protected group information complicates fairness audits.
method Robust optimization techniques to enforce fairness on true groups.
result Robust approaches achieve better true group fairness guarantees.
A new method uses model gradients to improve fairness without relying on demographic data.
problem Algorithmic fairness issues due to missing demographic information and complex interactions.
method Learning a graph of gradients to identify and improve group fairness robustly to noise.
result Significantly improves fairness without sacrificing overall accuracy.
New research shows fairness in machine learning can sometimes make disadvantaged groups worse off.
problem The impact of fairness constraints in machine learning on different groups.
method Unified, population-level (Bayes) framework for binary classification under prevalent group fairness notions.
result Fairness in machine learning can lead to leveling down, making one or both groups worse off.
Unified framework for fair classification with group-blindness/awareness guarantees.
problem Challenges in enforcing fairness and group-blindness in binary classification.
method Unified framework based on post-processing procedure, applicable to various group fairness notions.
result Minimax rate-optimality of the proposed algorithm with controlled excess risk.
Algorithm ensures fair ranking by minority groups alongside majority groups.
problem Ensuring fair ranking of items from minority groups alongside majority groups.
method Optimal transport-based regularizer for individual fairness and efficient optimization algorithm.
result Certifiably individually fair LTR models are achieved.
Extends ML fairness to handle minority groups over time.
problem Limitations of existing fairness criteria.
method Performative Distributionally Robust Optimization.
result Improves fairness for minority groups over time.
FaiREE provides fair classification with guarantees for small datasets.
problem Fairness in classification often requires large sample sizes and distributional assumptions.
method FaiREE offers finite-sample and distribution-free fairness guarantees.
result FaiREE achieves optimal accuracy and satisfies various fairness notions.
FairACE improves fairness in GNNs by balancing node performance across degree groups.
problem Degree biases in GNNs lead to unequal prediction performance among nodes with varying degrees.
method Integrates asymmetric contrastive learning with adversarial training to balance performance between high-degree and low-degree nodes.
result Significantly improves degree fairness metrics while maintaining competitive accuracy.
Fair machine learning models can be vulnerable to adversarial attacks that reduce their accuracy and fairness.
problem Fairness constraints in machine learning models can compromise their robustness against adversarial attacks.
method Analysis of data poisoning attacks on group-based fair machine learning models, focusing on equalized odds.
result Adversaries can significantly reduce the test accuracy of fair machine learning models and widen their fairness gap.
This paper introduces individual fairness in clustering using f f f -divergence.
problem Ensuring fair clustering by treating similar individuals similarly.
method Uses f f f -divergence to measure statistical similarity and assigns individuals to probability distributions over cluster centers. result Provides an algorithm with provable approximation guarantee for clustering with individual fairness constraints.
Proposes FairRR to improve fairness in machine learning models through randomized response.
problem Achieving group fairness in machine learning models.
method Formulates group fairness as optimizing a design matrix in Randomized Response, proposing FairRR.
result Demonstrates FairRR yields excellent model utility and fairness.
Unified framework for Bayes-optimal classifiers under group fairness.
problem Mitigating disparate impacts from algorithmic predictions in high-stakes decision-making.
method Unified framework based on Neyman-Pearson argument for deriving Bayes-optimal classifiers under group fairness constraints.
result Proposes FairBayes method that directly controls disparity and achieves optimal fairness-accuracy tradeoff.
New algorithm improves group fairness in social classification problems by exploiting performativity.
problem Inequities in social classification problems due to performativity.
method Develops algorithmic fairness practices that leverage performativity to achieve stronger group fairness guarantees.
result Achieves stronger group fairness guarantees compared to non-performative settings.
Doubly fair dynamic pricing ensures equal prices for different groups over time.
problem Achieving equal prices for different groups in online dynamic pricing.
method Online learning algorithm that balances procedural and substantive fairness.
result Achieves i l d e O ( T ) ilde{O}(\sqrt{T}) i l d e O ( T ) regret, zero procedural unfairness, and i l d e O ( T ) ilde{O}(\sqrt{T}) i l d e O ( T ) substantive unfairness. A new method for fair PCA ensures balanced error across groups.
problem Balancing approximation error across different groups in multi-group data.
method Iterative method to compute fair principal components minimizing max group-wise reconstruction error.
result Preserves the containment property of standard PCA and reduces to standard PCA for single-group data.
Improves fairness in machine learning by adding underrepresented group data.
problem Machine learning biases across subgroups due to under-representation or societal biases.
method Data augmentation via pairwise mixup across subgroups to balance subpopulations.
result Achieves fair outcomes with robust if not improved accuracy.
Paper examines fairness of data augmentation methods, finding vanilla Mixup outperforms Fair Mixup.
problem Improving fairness in classification models with limited minority data.
method Uses multicalibration to rigorously evaluate and improve data augmentation methods for classification fairness.
result Vanilla Mixup outperforms Fair Mixup and baseline methods in fairness and accuracy, especially with small minority groups.
Fairness in machine learning increases privacy risks, especially for underrepresented groups.
problem Privacy risks in fair machine learning models, particularly for underrepresented groups.
method Membership inference attacks to measure information leakage and analyze fairness vs. privacy trade-offs.
result Achieving fairness in machine learning models increases privacy risks, especially for underrepresented groups.
FBC clusters data fairly without needing cluster count.
problem Fairness in clustering groups of different sensitive groups.
method Developed a Bayesian model-based clustering method with a fair prior and efficient MCMC algorithm.
result Reasonably infers the number of clusters and achieves a fair utility trade-off.
The paper tackles fair classification with multiple sensitive features.
problem Existing fair classification methods often consider a single sensitive feature, but in practice, individuals are defined by multiple sensitive features.
method Characterizes Bayes-optimal fair classifiers for multiple sensitive features under various fairness measures, proposing in-processing and post-processing algorithms.
result Bayes-optimal fair classifiers for multiple sensitive features are instance-dependent thresholding rules that rely on a weighted sum of group membership probabilities.
A distinction has been drawn in fair machine learning research between `group' and `individual' fairness measures. Many technical research papers assume that both are important, but conflicting, and propose ways to minimise the trade-offs between these measures. This paper argues that this apparent conflict is based on…
New algorithm ensures fair matching in resource allocation.
problem Ensuring fairness in matching algorithms for scarce resources.
method Introduces a modified Sinkhorn algorithm and two relaxation strategies for group fairness in Optimal Transport.
result Demonstrates improved matching quality and fairness trade-off.
This work introduces oblivious fairness definitions for image generation.
problem Fairness in image generation with uncertain sensitive attributes.
method Introduces oblivious fairness definitions and uses Posterior Sampling.
result Conditional Proportional Representation can be achieved obliviously.
Fair HAC algorithms ensure clustering fairness across protected groups.
problem Ensuring clustering fairness in HAC algorithms when datasets contain biases.
method Proposes fair algorithms for HAC that enforce fairness constraints regardless of distance linkage criteria.
result Our fair HAC algorithms find fairer clusterings compared to vanilla HAC and other fair clustering approaches.
This paper introduces efficient approximations for fairness criteria in regression models.
problem Measuring fairness in real-valued outcomes (regression settings) is computationally challenging.
method Fast approximations of mutual information for independence, separation, and sufficiency fairness criteria.
result The method achieves state-of-the-art accuracy/fairness tradeoffs in real-world datasets.
Framework tests group fairness in machine learning models.
problem Detecting biases in machine learning classifiers.
method Optimal transport projections to audit group fairness.
result Statistical test for various fairness notions efficiently computed.
Proposes a method to select fair performance metrics through metric elicitation.
problem Choosing fair performance metrics in multiclass classification with multiple sensitive groups.
method Metric elicitation strategy that requires only relative preference feedback and is robust to noise.
result Elicits group-fair performance metrics for multiclass classification problems.
New framework for fair ranking with noisy protected attributes.
problem Errors in socially-salient attributes undermine fairness guarantees.
method Modeling perturbations in protected attributes and incorporating probabilistic information.
result Framework provides provable guarantees on fairness and utility.
Paper introduces threshold invariant fairness to ensure equitable predictions across different groups.
problem Machine learning models can be unfair to certain groups based on sensitive attributes.
method Proposes threshold invariant fairness and uses two approximation methods to equalize risk distributions.
result Demonstrates effectiveness in alleviating threshold sensitivity in fairness models.
Bayesian data selection framework ensures fairness in machine learning models.
problem High computational costs and limited scalability of fairness-aware methods.
method Bayesian data selection framework using generalized discrepancy measures.
result Consistently outperforms existing methods in fairness and accuracy.
Fairmetrics evaluates fairness in ML models for specific groups.
problem Ensuring models do not produce biased outcomes for specific groups.
method User-friendly R package for evaluating group-based fairness criteria.
result Rigorous evaluation of multiple fairness metrics.
SenSeI ensures fair models by enforcing invariance on sensitive groups.
problem Ensuring fair machine learning models that respect sensitive groups.
method Designing a transport-based regularizer to enforce invariance on sensitive sets.
result Certifiably fair ML models trained using SenSeI achieve improved fairness metrics.
New fair regression method improves fairness in chronic kidney disease classification.
problem Mitigating societal bias in health care for multiple groups.
method Penalized fair regression framework for multiple groups, with penalties for true positive rate disparity.
result Achieves fairness-accuracy frontier beyond existing methods in simulations and real-world data.
The paper explores various forms of calibration scores and their implications for fairness.
problem The evaluation of probabilistic predictions through calibration.
method The authors organize three grouping choices and one agglomeration of group errors, providing a framework for comparing and creating new calibration scores.
result The study demonstrates that appropriate choices of grouping can provide notions of (sub-)group or individual fairness.
The paper tackles fair sharing of exploration costs across groups in online learning.
problem Sharing the cost of exploration fairly across multiple groups in online learning.
method The paper introduces the 'grouped' bandit model and uses axiomatic bargaining theory, specifically the Nash bargaining solution, to formalize fairness.
result The paper derives policies that are optimally fair and regret-optimal, showing that regret-optimal policies can be unfair.
New fairness approach removes direct effects of unprivileged groups through causal regularization.
problem Ensuring fairness in machine learning models for unprivileged groups.
method Proposes a new fairness definition based on causal effects and develops regularizations to remove the impact of unprivileged groups on model outcomes.
result Demonstrates effectiveness of the approach on various datasets, reducing unfairness with minimal performance loss.