Research
On-device research index

arXiv research

A locally-built, LLM-digested index of recent arXiv papers in quant finance, geometry/topology, and statistical ML — keyword search served straight from SQLite on this machine.

168,742 papers · 148 categories

Trend · papers per month

255075100 · May 202619922001200920172026
48 results for Formal Verification

This paper explores formal verification for autonomous systems, identifying limitations and proposing improvements.

problem Ensuring safety of autonomous systems like self-driving cars and drones.
method Formal verification techniques based on formal methods, analyzing three assumptions and their limitations.
result Preliminary work to improve the strength of evidence provided by formal verification.

Formalizes weak and strong verification for LLMs, controlling errors without assumptions.

problem Balancing cost and reliability in reasoning with LLMs.
method Formalizes weak-strong verification policies, introduces metrics, develops online algorithm.
result Optimal policies admit a two-threshold structure, and calibration and sharpness govern value of weak verifiers.

We present a new approach to assessing the robustness of neural networks based on estimating the proportion of inputs for which a property is violated. Specifically, we estimate the probability of the event that the property is violated under an input model. Our approach critically varies from the formal verification f…

2018-11-17abs ↗pdf ↗

Formal verification of neural networks is essential for their deployment in safety-critical areas. Many available formal verification methods have been shown to be instances of a unified Branch and Bound (BaB) formulation. We propose a novel framework for designing an effective branching strategy for BaB. Specifically,…

2019-12-03abs ↗pdf ↗

The success of Deep Learning and its potential use in many safety-critical applications has motivated research on formal verification of Neural Network (NN) models. In this context, verification involves proving or disproving that an NN model satisfies certain input-output properties. Despite the reputation of learned …

2019-09-14abs ↗pdf ↗

This study extends verifiable learning to boosted tree ensembles, enabling efficient security verification.

problem Efficiently verifying the robustness of boosted tree ensembles against norm-based attackers.
method Formal verification of robustness for large-spread boosted tree ensembles, considering LL_\infty-norm and pseudo-polynomial time for LpL_p-norm verification.
result Polynomial time verification for LL_\infty-norm attackers, NP-hard for other norms, and pseudo-polynomial time for LpL_p-norm verification.

We study the problem of formally verifying the robustness to adversarial examples of support vector machines (SVMs), a major machine learning model for classification and regression tasks. Following a recent stream of works on formal robustness verification of (deep) neural networks, our approach relies on a sound abst…

2019-04-26abs ↗pdf ↗

PEREGRiNN verifies safety of ReLU NNs by penalizing relaxation in a greedy manner.

problem Formal verification of safety specifications for ReLU NNs.
method Uses a relaxed convex program to verify polytopic input/output constraints, penalizing relaxation and forcing largest relaxations to early layers.
result Significantly faster and more properties verified compared to other approaches.

We study the robustness verification problem for tree-based models, including decision trees, random forests (RFs) and gradient boosted decision trees (GBDTs). Formal robustness verification of decision tree ensembles involves finding the exact minimal adversarial perturbation or a guaranteed lower bound of it. Existin…

2019-06-10abs ↗pdf ↗

This paper addresses the problem of formally verifying desirable properties of neural networks, i.e., obtaining provable guarantees that neural networks satisfy specifications relating their inputs and outputs (robustness to bounded norm adversarial perturbations, for example). Most previous work on this topic was limi…

2018-03-17abs ↗pdf ↗

Accelerates DNN robustness verification with target labels.

problem Improving the robustness of deep neural networks against adversarial attacks.
method Guiding robustness verification with target labels, reducing search space and using symbolic interval propagation and linear relaxation.
result Significantly improves DNN verification speed by 36X, especially when perturbation distance is reasonable.

Despite the tremendous advances that have been made in the last decade on developing useful machine-learning applications, their wider adoption has been hindered by the lack of strong assurance guarantees that can be made about their behavior. In this paper, we consider how formal verification techniques developed for …

2019-07-16abs ↗pdf ↗

This research simplifies verification of machine learning systems using reparameterization.

problem Reduce or eliminate serious bugs in machine learning systems.
method Use proof assistants to construct machine-checked proofs of correctness, leveraging reparameterization to handle probabilistic claims.
result Demonstrates broad applicability of reparameterization to verify different types of machine learning systems.

Recent advances in machine learning and artificial intelligence are now being considered in safety-critical autonomous systems where software defects may cause severe harm to humans and the environment. Design organizations in these domains are currently unable to provide convincing arguments that their systems are saf…

2019-05-10abs ↗pdf ↗

Theoretical limits on verifying self-improving systems without risking unbounded utility.

problem Formalizing and proving the limits of safety verification for self-improving systems.
method Developed dual conditions and used Holder's inequality, NP counting method, and Lipschitz bounds to establish impossibility and ceiling results.
result A classifier-based safety gate cannot simultaneously permit unbounded beneficial self-modification and bounded cumulative risk.

Improved neural network verification using Lagrangian decomposition and parallel algorithms.

problem Formally proving input-output properties of neural networks efficiently.
method Novel bounding and branching algorithms based on Lagrangian Decomposition and activation-based heuristics.
result Significant reduction in verification times, up to 50x faster on adversarial robustness properties.

Two impossibility theorems show formal alignment certification is impossible for AI systems.

problem Formal certification of AI alignment over open-ended domains is impossible.
method Two independent impossibility theorems: Semantic and Statistical barriers.
result No procedure can simultaneously satisfy soundness, completeness, and tractability.

We introduce a formal framework for analyzing trades in financial markets. An exchange is where multiple buyers and sellers participate to trade. These days, all big exchanges use computer algorithms that implement double sided auctions to match buy and sell requests and these algorithms must abide by certain regulator…

2019-07-18abs ↗pdf ↗

The study develops a logic reasoner to verify MS case management specifications.

problem Ensuring correctness and solvability of abstract clinical work products.
method Developed a logic reasoner using UML class and state diagrams, SPIN, and ODM.
result Formal representations of UML diagrams proved consistent for MS case management.

Paper formalizes multi-dimensional FSD using geometric methods.

problem Complex measure theory and calculus barriers to formalization in proof assistants.
method Geometric framework for first-order stochastic dominance in N dimensions.
result Geometric approach bypasses complex integration theory for direct comparison of survival probabilities.

This paper introduces a new classification tool named Silas, which is built to provide a more transparent and dependable data analytics service. A focus of Silas is on providing a formal foundation of decision trees in order to support logical analysis and verification of learned prediction models. This paper describes…

2019-10-03abs ↗pdf ↗

Paper formalizes Simon's satisficing through FFSD, proving its equivalence to expected utility theory.

problem Formalizing Herbert Simon's bounded rationality concept in economic decision-making.
method Developed FFSD framework using Lean 4 theorem prover, proving equivalence to expected utility theory.
result Equivalence theorem linking FFSD to expected utility maximization for approximate indicator functions.

Generalizes neural network verification by adding arbitrary cutting planes.

problem Handling general cutting plane constraints in neural network verification.
method Generalized bound propagation method (GCP-CROWN) that allows arbitrary cutting plane constraints.
result GCP-CROWN significantly improves neural network verification performance.

We address the problem of verifying neural-based perception systems implemented by convolutional neural networks. We define a notion of local robustness based on affine and photometric transformations. We show the notion cannot be captured by previously employed notions of robustness. The method proposed is based on re…

2018-11-28abs ↗pdf ↗

A new framework for robustness analysis of deep neural networks using PAC-model learning.

problem Analyzing local robustness of deep neural networks.
method Black-box model learning with scenario optimisation to abstract DNN behaviour via an affine model with PAC guarantee.
result DeepPAC outperforms state-of-the-art statistical methods in practical robustness analysis.

Revel tackles safe exploration in RL with verified symbolic policies.

problem Computational infeasibility of verifying neural networks in RL learning loops.
method Two policy classes: neurosymbolic with approximate gradients and symbolic policies for efficient verification. Mirror descent over policies to safely update and project policies.
result Revel discovers policies that outperform prior approaches to verified exploration.

Hypothesis testing is an important problem with applications in target localization, clinical trials etc. Many active hypothesis testing strategies operate in two phases: an exploration phase and a verification phase. In the exploration phase, selection of experiments is such that a moderate level of confidence on the …

2018-12-04abs ↗pdf ↗