Research
On-device research index

arXiv research

A locally-built, LLM-digested index of recent arXiv papers in quant finance, geometry/topology, and statistical ML — keyword search served straight from SQLite on this machine.

168,695 papers · 148 categories

Trend · papers per month

2885758631,150 · Jun 202019922001200920172026
48 results for FAIR data

Two simple methods learn fair metrics from data to improve fairness in ML tasks.

problem Lack of widely accepted fair metrics for many ML tasks hinders individual fairness adoption.
method Presented two simple ways to learn fair metrics from various data types.
result Fair training with learned metrics improves fairness on three ML tasks.

Paper creates fair synthetic data ensuring equal predictions across sensitive attributes.

problem Ensuring fair predictions across sensitive attributes in synthetic data.
method Equalizing target probability distributions across sensitive attributes in synthetic data generation.
result Synthetic data provides strong fair predictions, equal across all thresholds.

DECAF generates fair synthetic data by embedding causal relationships.

problem Generating fair synthetic data from biased training data.
method DECAF uses a GAN with a structural causal model to embed causal relationships and debias synthetic data.
result DECAF successfully removes bias and generates high-quality synthetic data.

Fairness-aware learning is increasingly important in data mining. Discrimination prevention aims to prevent discrimination in the training data before it is used to conduct predictive analysis. In this paper, we focus on fair data generation that ensures the generated data is discrimination free. Inspired by generative…

2018-05-28abs ↗pdf ↗

Paper examines fairness of data augmentation methods, finding vanilla Mixup outperforms Fair Mixup.

problem Improving fairness in classification models with limited minority data.
method Uses multicalibration to rigorously evaluate and improve data augmentation methods for classification fairness.
result Vanilla Mixup outperforms Fair Mixup and baseline methods in fairness and accuracy, especially with small minority groups.

Fair machine learning models can be vulnerable to adversarial attacks that reduce their accuracy and fairness.

problem Fairness constraints in machine learning models can compromise their robustness against adversarial attacks.
method Analysis of data poisoning attacks on group-based fair machine learning models, focusing on equalized odds.
result Adversaries can significantly reduce the test accuracy of fair machine learning models and widen their fairness gap.

The wide spread usage of automated data-driven decision support systems has raised a lot of concerns regarding accountability and fairness of the employed models in the absence of human supervision. Existing fairness-aware approaches tackle fairness as a batch learning problem and aim at learning a fair model which can…

2019-07-16abs ↗pdf ↗

The paper connects counterfactual fairness to robust prediction and group fairness using causal context.

problem The challenge of ensuring fairness in AI systems when counterfactuals cannot be directly observed.
method Using causal context to bridge counterfactual fairness, robust prediction, and group fairness.
result Counterfactual fairness is equivalent to group fairness metrics in specific contexts.

New algorithms handle missing data to improve fairness in machine learning.

problem Missing values in data can lead to unfair outcomes in machine learning models.
method Developed scalable and adaptive algorithms to handle missing values while preserving predictive information.
result Our adaptive algorithms consistently achieve higher fairness and accuracy than standard impute-then-classify methods.

We study fairness in collaborative-filtering recommender systems, which are sensitive to discrimination that exists in historical data. Biased data can lead collaborative-filtering methods to make unfair predictions for users from minority groups. We identify the insufficiency of existing fairness metrics and propose f…

2017-05-24abs ↗pdf ↗

Develops a framework for fair semi-supervised learning.

problem Balancing fairness and accuracy in semi-supervised learning.
method Formulates a framework as an optimization problem, incorporating classifier loss, label propagation loss, and fairness constraints.
result Achieves fair semi-supervised learning with better accuracy-fairness trade-off than fair supervised learning.

Motivated by concerns surrounding the fairness effects of sharing and transferring fair machine learning tools, we propose two algorithms: Fairness Warnings and Fair-MAML. The first is a model-agnostic algorithm that provides interpretable boundary conditions for when a fairly trained model may not behave fairly on sim…

2019-08-24abs ↗pdf ↗

The paper tackles fairness in forecasting and learning linear dynamical systems.

problem Under-representation bias in training data for multiple subgroups.
method Introducing subgroup-fair and instant-fair learning of LDS from multiple trajectories of varying lengths, using hierarchies of convexifications of non-commutative polynomial optimisation problems.
result Empirical results show both the beneficial impact of fairness considerations on statistical performance and encouraging effects of exploiting sparsity on run time.

Study highlights how lazy data practices in fair ML research can unfairly impact minority groups.

problem Lazy data practices in fair ML research can unfairly impact minority groups.
method Systematic study of 280 experiments across 142 publications on 142 datasets.
result Unreflective data practices lead to biased findings and unfair treatment of minorities.

Study on missing data mechanisms and simple imputation methods in fairness of machine learning algorithms.

problem Impact of missing data mechanisms and simple imputation methods on fairness of machine learning algorithms.
method Three popular datasets for classification fairness were used. Missing values were generated using three missing data mechanisms. Various missing data handling techniques (listwise deletion, mean imputation, mode imputation, multiple imputation) were applied to the datasets. Fairness was assessed using classification algorithms (random forests).
result Missing data mechanism does not significantly impact fairness; listwise deletion gives highest fairness on average.

FIFA improves fairness in imbalanced datasets by encouraging both classification and fairness generalization.

problem Imbalanced datasets lead to poor fairness generalization in classifiers.
method FIFA: Imbalance-Fairness-Aware approach that encourages both classification and fairness generalization.
result FIFA improves fairness generalization on real-world datasets.

FVNNs use graph convolutions on fair covariance estimates to improve fairness in machine learning.

problem Data-driven methods can encode biases in sample covariance matrices, leading to unfair treatment of different subpopulations.
method FVNNs perform graph convolutions on fair covariance estimates and use a fairness regularizer in the loss function.
result FVNNs provide a flexible model that is intrinsically fairer than PCA approaches and can handle low sample regimes.

Fairness in machine learning increases privacy risks, especially for underrepresented groups.

problem Privacy risks in fair machine learning models, particularly for underrepresented groups.
method Membership inference attacks to measure information leakage and analyze fairness vs. privacy trade-offs.
result Achieving fairness in machine learning models increases privacy risks, especially for underrepresented groups.

Proposes a method to enforce fairness in machine learning models without sensitive data.

problem Bias in machine learning models from historical data.
method Infers sensitive attributes from auxiliary features and integrates fairness constraints into model training.
result Mitigates bias while preserving predictive accuracy.

Propensity score matching improves fairness in machine learning models.

problem Bias in training data affects fairness metrics in machine learning models.
method Propensity score matching to evaluate and mitigate bias in test data.
result FairMatch significantly reduces bias in test data without sacrificing predictive performance.

Fair active learning selects data points to balance model accuracy and fairness.

problem Ensuring fairness in machine learning models used in high-stakes applications.
method Designing algorithms for fair active learning that select data points to balance model accuracy and fairness, focusing on demographic parity.
result Demonstrated the effectiveness of the proposed fair active learning approach over benchmark datasets.

FR-Train improves fair and robust AI training by detecting and reducing poisoned data.

problem Training AI models that are fair and robust in the presence of data bias and poisoning.
method Mutual information-based adversarial training with an additional discriminator.
result FR-Train maintains fairness and accuracy even in the presence of poisoned data.

Recent work in fairness in machine learning has proposed adjusting for fairness by equalizing accuracy metrics across groups and has also studied how datasets affected by historical prejudices may lead to unfair decision policies. We connect these lines of work and study the residual unfairness that arises when a fairn…

2018-06-07abs ↗pdf ↗

Proposes a method to learn fair predictors for multiple subgroups with limited data.

problem Fairness and accuracy issues in learning from multiple subgroups with limited data.
method Formulates a bilevel objective to learn subgroup-specific predictors and a fair predictor that is close to all of them.
result The method effectively controls group sufficiency and generalization error, improving fairness and accuracy.

Optimal LDP mechanisms reduce data unfairness in classification.

problem Reducing data unfairness in classification models.
method Developed a closed-form optimal mechanism for binary attributes and a tractable framework for multi-valued attributes.
result Optimal LDP mechanisms improve fairness in classification while maintaining accuracy close to non-private models.

This work proposes a new pre-processing method for supervised learning to improve fairness without sacrificing utility.

problem Improving fairness in supervised learning without compromising model performance.
method Task-tailored pre-processing approach that balances fairness and utility.
result The proposed method preserves consistent trade-offs among multiple downstream models and improves fairness in computer vision tasks.

WassFFed addresses fairness in Federated Learning by ensuring consistency between local and global models.

problem Achieving fairness in Federated Learning where data is distributed among diverse user groups.
method WassFFed employs a Wasserstein barycenter calculation to aggregate local models' outputs, ensuring consistency and fairness.
result WassFFed outperforms existing approaches in balancing accuracy and fairness.