Artificial intelligence (AI) comes with great opportunities but can also pose significant risks. Automatically generated explanations for decisions can increase transparency and foster trust, especially for systems based on automated predictions by AI models. However, given, e.g., economic incentives to create dishones…
On-device research index
arXiv research
A locally-built, LLM-digested index of recent arXiv papers in quant finance, geometry/topology, and statistical ML — keyword search served straight from SQLite on this machine.
168,695 papers · 148 categories
Trend · papers per month
48 results for “AI Explanations”
The ubiquity of systems using artificial intelligence or "AI" has brought increasing attention to how those systems should be regulated. The choice of how to regulate AI systems will require care. AI systems have the potential to synthesize large amounts of data, allowing for greater levels of personalization and preci…
Explainable AI improves human decision accuracy but does not enhance it significantly.
problem Improving human decision-making through explainable AI.
method Comparing human decision accuracy with and without AI predictions, including or excluding explanations.
result Providing AI predictions improves human decision accuracy, but explanations do not significantly enhance it.
New method provides calibrated feature importance explanations for regression models.
problem Lack of uncertainty quantification in existing local explanation methods.
method Extension of Calibrated Explanations method to support regression and probabilistic regression.
result Calibrated Explanations for regression provides quantified uncertainty and robust explanations.
Paper defines XAI concepts using category theory.
problem Lack of precise mathematical definitions for XAI.
method Uses Category theory to define XAI concepts rigorously.
result Establishes a theoretical foundation for XAI.
New metric assesses reliability of AI explanations.
problem Unreliable AI explanations under realistic conditions.
method Explanation Reliability Index (ERI) metrics quantifying stability under four axioms.
result Widespread reliability failures in popular explanation methods.
Self-explaining AI provides understandable explanations for AI decisions.
problem Difficulty in interpreting decisions made by deep neural networks, especially in critical applications.
method Introducing self-explaining AI that provides human-understandable explanations and confidence levels.
result Deep neural networks operate by interpolating between data points, making them hard to interpret.
Financial decisions impact our lives, and thus everyone from the regulator to the consumer is interested in fair, sound, and explainable decisions. There is increasing competitive desire and regulatory incentive to deploy AI mindfully within financial services. An important mechanism towards that end is to explain AI d…
Survey reviews explainability in AI for healthcare, emphasizing trust and transparency.
problem Lack of transparency hinders AI adoption in healthcare.
method Comprehensive literature review to guide explainable AI design.
result Quantitative evaluation metrics are needed for some explainability properties.
PiNets provide faithful explanations for neural networks.
problem Lack of true explanations for neural network predictions.
method Pointwise-interpretable Networks (PiNets) that form linear models instance-wise.
result PiNets offer explanations that are meaningful, aligned, robust, and sufficient.
Paper introduces Native Guide for generating time series counterfactual explanations.
problem Lack of explainability for time series data in AI systems.
method Model-agnostic, instance-based counterfactual generation for time series classification.
result Native Guide produces better counterfactual explanations than benchmarks.
As artificial intelligence and machine learning algorithms make further inroads into society, calls are increasing from multiple stakeholders for these algorithms to explain their outputs. At the same time, these stakeholders, whether they be affected citizens, government regulators, domain experts, or system developer…
LIMEADE improves AI advice for opaque models, enhancing accuracy and user satisfaction.
problem Lack of advice methods for opaque AI models.
method Develops a general framework to translate advice into model updates.
result Improves accuracy and user satisfaction compared to baselines.
A method compares AI corrections to a base model for explaining predictions.
problem Creating explanations for AI predictions.
method Introduces a surrogate model to correct a simpler base model and provides criteria for accuracy and fidelity.
result Induces neighborhoods of instances with ideal accuracy and fidelity.
Framework enhances AI explainability by aligning with human cognitive models.
problem Lack of explainability in AI models hinders trust and accountability.
method Integrates explainability techniques with Malle's five category model of behavior explanation.
result Demonstrates practical relevance in credit risk assessment and regulatory analysis.
We examine counterfactual explanations for explaining the decisions made by model-based AI systems. The counterfactual approach we consider defines an explanation as a set of the system's data inputs that causally drives the decision (i.e., changing the inputs in the set changes the decision) and is irreducible (i.e., …
Exploring a new method to explain AI models in medical devices.
problem Lack of explainability in AI models used in medical devices.
method Using the Jacobian matrix to measure model response stability to small perturbations.
result A first step towards a perturbation-based explanation of AI models.
AI aids in mathematics research and problem-solving.
problem Complex mathematical problems and discoveries.
method Explains AI principles and diverse applications in math.
result AI assists in discovering patterns, proving theorems, and challenging conjectures.
Unified view of improving tree model interpretability and debiasing feature importance.
problem Improving interpretability and debiasing feature importance in tree-based models.
method Demonstrates a common thread among bias correction methods and local explanations for trees.
result Points out a bias in explainable AI for trees algorithms due to inbag data inclusion.
New framework quantifies uncertainties in neural network explanations.
problem Lack of methods to quantify uncertainties in neural network explanations.
method Converts any explanation method into a Bayesian neural network method, modeling uncertainties.
result Allows quantification of explanation uncertainties and appropriate confidence levels.
This paper proposes a set of criteria to evaluate the objectiveness of explanation methods of neural networks, which is crucial for the development of explainable AI, but it also presents significant challenges. The core challenge is that people usually cannot obtain ground-truth explanations of the neural network. To …
Extends local attributions to Bayesian Neural Networks for improved explanations.
problem Lack of explanations for Bayesian Neural Networks' predictions.
method Extend local attributions to a probabilistic explanation distribution of BNNs.
result Enriches standard explanations with uncertainty information and visualizes explanation stability.
Improved credit scoring model with explainability.
problem Making financial decisions based on loan applications.
method Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) model with 360-degree explanation framework.
result Model achieves state-of-the-art performance and provides understandable explanations.
Automates investor/company matching with AI, explaining decisions.
problem Matching companies and investors is hard due to limited data and need for explanations.
method Representation learning for small datasets + parameterized explanation generation.
result System performs well on matching task and explains decisions.
Artificial Intelligence (AI) has become an integral part of domains such as security, finance, healthcare, medicine, and criminal justice. Explaining the decisions of AI systems in human terms is a key challenge--due to the high complexity of the model, as well as the potential implications on human interests, rights, …
Survey of determinism issues in financial AI systems.
problem Vulnerabilities in reproducibility of financial AI systems.
method Literature review and first-party experiments on public financial datasets.
result Proposed a layered evaluation framework linking modality-specific metrics to audit readiness.
This review explores methods to explain deep neural networks and their applications.
problem Understanding the decision-making process of deep neural networks.
method Overview of interpretability methods, theoretical foundations, and comparative evaluations.
result Demonstrates the effectiveness of explainable AI in various applications.
XAI methods fail to explain ML models reliably.
problem Current XAI methods fail to provide reliable explanations for ML models.
method Formally define problems and design methods accordingly.
result Diverse notions of explanation correctness and metrics needed.
Paper explains distance-based classifiers using neural network structures.
problem Making distance-based classifiers explainable.
method Uncovering latent neural network structures in distance-based classifiers.
result Novel explanation approach outperforms baselines.
This paper enhances credit risk management using explainable AI techniques.
problem Lack of transparency and explainability in AI models for credit risk management.
method Implement LIME and SHAP for explaining ML-based credit scoring models.
result Demonstrates practical challenges and solutions for XAI methods in finance.
The increasing use of machine learning in practice and legal regulations like EU's GDPR cause the necessity to be able to explain the prediction and behavior of machine learning models. A prominent example of particularly intuitive explanations of AI models in the context of decision making are counterfactual explanati…
With the advent of GDPR, the domain of explainable AI and model interpretability has gained added impetus. Methods to extract and communicate visibility into decision-making models have become legal requirement. Two specific types of explanations, contrastive and counterfactual have been identified as suitable for huma…
CEILS generates feasible counterfactual explanations by considering causal impacts.
problem Current counterfactual explanations lack feasibility and causal impact consideration.
method CEILS integrates causal reasoning into existing counterfactuals generation algorithms.
result CEILS provides feasible recommendations to achieve desired outcomes.
CONFETTI improves interpretability of deep learning models for MTS by providing counterfactual explanations.
problem Lack of transparency in deep learning models for multivariate time series classification.
method CONFETTI is a novel multi-objective counterfactual explanation method that balances prediction confidence, proximity, and sparsity.
result CONFETTI outperforms state-of-the-art methods in various metrics, improving interpretability and decision support.
RESHAPE explains financial statement anomalies by aggregating explanations from AENNs.
problem Detecting and explaining accounting anomalies in financial audits is challenging.
method Proposes RESHAPE to explain model output on an aggregated attribute-level.
result RESHAPE provides more comprehensible explanations compared to existing methods.
1-Lipschitz neural networks produce clearer, more focused Saliency Maps for explainable AI.
problem Noisy and limited Saliency Maps from traditional neural networks.
method Dual loss of optimal transport problem for 1-Lipschitz neural networks.
result Saliency Maps from 1-Lipschitz networks are highly concentrated and less noisy, aligning with human explanations.
New framework evaluates model explanations based on decision task improvement.
problem Evaluation of model explanations often misses practical value.
method Decision-theoretic framework quantifying three key values.
result Provides benchmarks and interprets human-AI decision support.
What's Wrong with Your Synthetic Tabular Data? Using Explainable AI to Evaluate Generative Modelscs.LG
AI techniques explain synthetic tabular data weaknesses.
problem Challenges in evaluating synthetic tabular data quality.
method Apply explainable AI to a binary detection classifier.
result Reveals inconsistencies, unrealistic dependencies, or missing patterns in synthetic data.
P-SE explains model decisions with minimal feature subsets and fast estimators.
problem Explain model decisions in regression and classification.
method Probabilistic Sufficient Explanations (P-SE) with random Forests for conditional probability estimation.
result Consistent and efficient explanations for regression and classification models.
Despite outstanding contribution to the significant progress of Artificial Intelligence (AI), deep learning models remain mostly black boxes, which are extremely weak in explainability of the reasoning process and prediction results. Explainability is not only a gateway between AI and society but also a powerful tool t…
Explaining AI systems is fundamental both to the development of high performing models and to the trust placed in them by their users. The Shapley framework for explainability has strength in its general applicability combined with its precise, rigorous foundation: it provides a common, model-agnostic language for AI e…
Using machine learning in high-stakes applications often requires predictions to be accompanied by explanations comprehensible to the domain user, who has ultimate responsibility for decisions and outcomes. Recently, a new framework for providing explanations, called TED, has been proposed to provide meaningful explana…
This paper analyzes errors in Shapley value-based model explanations.
problem Biased or unreliable explanations from existing SVA methods.
method Error theoretical analysis framework decomposing errors into observation and structural biases.
result Trade-off between observation and structural biases in SVA explanations.
Survey of counterfactual explanations for time series classification.
problem Generating plausible and actionable counterfactuals for time series data.
method Review of various counterfactual generation methods for time series classification.
result Highlight unique challenges and strengths of existing methods.
This paper explores good practices for AI explainability in finance.
problem Complex financial models lack transparency and interpretability.
method Exploring good practices for deploying explainability in AI-based financial systems.
result Developing effective XAI tools for the financial industry.
AXE evaluates explanations to avoid misleading Rashomon set model selection.
problem Evaluating explanations for Rashomon set models to avoid false selection.
method Proposed AXE method to evaluate explanation quality.
result AXE detects adversarial fairwashing with 100% success rate.
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer and the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Most CRC deaths are the result of progression of metastases. The assessment of metastases is done using the RECIST criterion, which is time consuming and subjective, as clinicians need to manually me…
SpArX creates faithful explanations of neural networks' decision-making.
problem Challenges in explaining neural networks' decisions.
method Sparsifies MLPs while maintaining structure, then translates into QAFs for argumentative explanations.
result SpArX provides more faithful explanations than existing methods.