Research
On-device research index

arXiv research

A locally-built, LLM-digested index of recent arXiv papers in quant finance, geometry/topology, and statistical ML — keyword search served straight from SQLite on this machine.

168,695 papers · 148 categories

Trend · papers per month

20395978 · Jun 202019922001200920172026
48 results for subgroup fairness

A new algorithm COVA-FC improves subgroup-fair clustering efficiency.

problem Challenges in making cluster assignments independent of sensitive attributes in subgroups.
method Defining a subgroup-fairness gap, deriving a covariance-based surrogate, and introducing a continuous relaxation for efficient optimization.
result COVA-FC achieves competitive cost-fairness trade-offs and improves computational efficiency.

New algorithm tackles subgroup fairness in AI with multiple sensitive attributes.

problem Heavy computational burdens and data sparsity in subgroup fairness for multiple sensitive attributes.
method Doubly Regressing Adversarial learning (DRAF) for subgroup fairness, focusing on subgroups with sufficient sample sizes and marginal fairness.
result DRAF algorithm reduces a surrogate fairness gap for supIPM with less computation than directly reducing supIPM.

Proposes a method to learn fair predictors for multiple subgroups with limited data.

problem Fairness and accuracy issues in learning from multiple subgroups with limited data.
method Formulates a bilevel objective to learn subgroup-specific predictors and a fair predictor that is close to all of them.
result The method effectively controls group sufficiency and generalization error, improving fairness and accuracy.

The paper tackles fairness in forecasting and learning linear dynamical systems.

problem Under-representation bias in training data for multiple subgroups.
method Introducing subgroup-fair and instant-fair learning of LDS from multiple trajectories of varying lengths, using hierarchies of convexifications of non-commutative polynomial optimisation problems.
result Empirical results show both the beneficial impact of fairness considerations on statistical performance and encouraging effects of exploiting sparsity on run time.

Kearns et al. [2018] recently proposed a notion of rich subgroup fairness intended to bridge the gap between statistical and individual notions of fairness. Rich subgroup fairness picks a statistical fairness constraint (say, equalizing false positive rates across protected groups), but then asks that this constraint h…

2018-08-24abs ↗pdf ↗

The paper explores intersectional fairness in machine learning, proving bounds on it.

problem Intersectional fairness in machine learning, especially when multiple protected attributes are involved.
method Statistical analysis and bounds on intersectional fairness, leveraging marginal fairness.
result Theoretical bounds on intersectional fairness can be computed from marginal fairness and other statistical quantities.

With the aim of building machine learning systems that incorporate standards of fairness and accountability, we explore explicit subgroup sample complexity bounds. The work is motivated by the observation that classifier predictions for real world datasets often demonstrate drastically different metrics, such as accura…

2019-10-24abs ↗pdf ↗

Paper proposes a federated learning framework for relative fairness.

problem Traditional fairness in federated learning overlooks performance disparities between client subgroups.
method Uses a minimax problem approach to minimize relative unfairness, introducing a fairness index based on loss ratios.
result Empirical evaluations confirm the framework's effectiveness in maintaining model performance while reducing disparity.

This paper evaluates fairness in deep metric learning and proposes a method to reduce subgroup performance gaps.

problem The negative impact of deep metric learning representations on minority subgroup performance in downstream tasks.
method Definition of fairness in DML through inter-class, intra-class, and uniformity properties; finDML benchmark; Partial Attribute De-correlation (PARADE) method.
result Bias in DML representations propagates to downstream tasks, even with balanced training data.

We consider the problem of learning representations that achieve group and subgroup fairness with respect to multiple sensitive attributes. Taking inspiration from the disentangled representation learning literature, we propose an algorithm for learning compact representations of datasets that are useful for reconstruc…

2019-06-06abs ↗pdf ↗

The paper introduces a model to measure ASR fairness, addressing key issues.

problem Measuring fairness in ASR systems for different subgroups.
method Mixed-effects Poisson regression to control nuisance factors and handle unobserved heterogeneity.
result The method effectively addresses WER gaps among subgroups and is flexible for practical analyses.

A new method improves AI fairness assessment by estimating performance across intersectional subgroups.

problem Limited evaluation of AI systems across intersectional subgroups due to small sample sizes.
method Structured regression approach to disaggregated evaluation.
result Our method yields more accurate performance estimates, especially for small subgroups.

New framework for interpreting disaggregated fairness evaluations using causal models.

problem Misinterpretation of disaggregated fairness evaluations due to data representativeness and selection bias.
method Causal graphical models to characterize fairness properties and metric stability under different data generating processes.
result Disaggregated evaluations are unreliable without explicit assumptions regarding bias mechanisms.

Selective regression allows abstention to improve fairness criteria.

problem Selective regression can exacerbate disparities between subgroups.
method Proposes new fairness criteria and two approaches to mitigate performance disparity.
result Proposed fairness criteria ensures performance improvement for every subgroup with reduced coverage.

Fairness in machine learning increases privacy risks, especially for underrepresented groups.

problem Privacy risks in fair machine learning models, particularly for underrepresented groups.
method Membership inference attacks to measure information leakage and analyze fairness vs. privacy trade-offs.
result Achieving fairness in machine learning models increases privacy risks, especially for underrepresented groups.

The paper offers simple, near-optimal algorithms for multi-group learning.

problem Learning predictors within subgroups of a population, addressing fairness and hidden stratification.
method Studies the structure of solutions and provides simple, near-optimal algorithms.
result Simple and near-optimal algorithms for multi-group learning.

Fair k-means algorithm ensures equitable costs for different groups.

problem K-means clustering can result in biased outcomes for subgroups of data.
method Presented a fair k-means objective and algorithm (Fair-Lloyd) to choose cluster centers that provide equitable costs for different groups.
result Fair-Lloyd algorithm ensures all groups have equal costs in the output k-clustering, with negligible increase in running time.

Develops a new criterion for subgroup fairness in algorithmic decision support.

problem Identifying fair recommendations in algorithms despite group-level differences.
method IJDI criterion and IJDI-Scan approach to detect and mitigate disparities.
result Identifies significant disparities in recommendations across subpopulations.

This primer tackles biases in machine learning for image analysis, proposing solutions.

problem Causal and statistical biases in machine learning methods for image analysis.
method Introduction of causal and statistical structures that induce failure, highlighting two problems: no fair lunch and subgroup separability.
result Current fair representation learning methods fail to solve these problems, suggesting new paths forward.

We propose a fair principal component analysis method that balances reconstruction error and subgroup fairness.

problem Fairness and robustness in principal component analysis for consequential domains.
method Distributionally robust optimization over the Stiefel manifold with a Riemannian subgradient descent.
result The proposed method achieves better performance on real-world datasets compared to state-of-the-art baselines.

ROME improves algorithmic fairness by learning latent group structure robustly.

problem Latent subgroup disparities and distribution shifts in machine learning models.
method ROME uses an Expectation-Maximization algorithm for linear models and a neural Mixture-of-Experts for nonlinear settings.
result ROME significantly improves fairness compared to standard methods while maintaining average performance.

Randomized predictions ensure fair and accurate individual calibration in machine learning.

problem Systematic bias in typical calibration methods leads to unfair predictions for certain subgroups.
method Randomization of predictions to enforce individual calibration, trading off bias with variance.
result Randomized regression functions are more calibrated for arbitrary subgroups and achieve higher utility.

We propose a novel algorithm for learning fair representations that can simultaneously mitigate two notions of disparity among different demographic subgroups in the classification setting. Two key components underpinning the design of our algorithm are balanced error rate and conditional alignment of representations. …

2019-10-16abs ↗pdf ↗

New framework tackles fairness in link prediction beyond demographic parity.

problem Systemic biases in link prediction can exacerbate societal inequalities.
method Formalizes limitations of existing fairness evaluations and proposes a new framework.
result Proposes a lightweight post-processing method combined with decoupled link predictors.

Simulations of infectious disease spread have long been used to understand how epidemics evolve and how to effectively treat them. However, comparatively little attention has been paid to understanding the fairness implications of different treatment strategies -- that is, how might such strategies distribute the expec…

2019-11-01abs ↗pdf ↗

FIFA improves fairness in imbalanced datasets by encouraging both classification and fairness generalization.

problem Imbalanced datasets lead to poor fairness generalization in classifiers.
method FIFA: Imbalance-Fairness-Aware approach that encourages both classification and fairness generalization.
result FIFA improves fairness generalization on real-world datasets.

Developing learning methods which do not discriminate subgroups in the population is a central goal of algorithmic fairness. One way to reach this goal is by modifying the data representation in order to meet certain fairness constraints. In this work we measure fairness according to demographic parity. This requires t…

2019-06-25abs ↗pdf ↗

Common fairness definitions in machine learning focus on balancing notions of disparity and utility. In this work, we study fairness in the context of risk disparity among sub-populations. We are interested in learning models that minimize performance discrepancies across sensitive groups without causing unnecessary ha…

2019-11-16abs ↗pdf ↗

FairGP uses graph partitioning to make Graph Transformers fair and scalable.

problem Fairness issues in Graph Transformers, especially against sensitive features.
method Graph partitioning to minimize the influence of higher-order nodes and optimize attention mechanisms.
result FairGP improves fairness in Graph Transformers while reducing computational complexity.

Recent work has explored how to train machine learning models which do not discriminate against any subgroup of the population as determined by sensitive attributes such as gender or race. To avoid disparate treatment, sensitive attributes should not be considered. On the other hand, in order to avoid disparate impact,…

2018-06-08abs ↗pdf ↗

We study methods for improving fairness to subgroups in settings with overlapping populations and sequential predictions. Classical notions of fairness focus on the balance of some property across different populations. However, in many applications the goal of the different groups is not to be predicted equally but ra…

2019-09-18abs ↗pdf ↗

Propensity score matching improves fairness in machine learning models.

problem Bias in training data affects fairness metrics in machine learning models.
method Propensity score matching to evaluate and mitigate bias in test data.
result FairMatch significantly reduces bias in test data without sacrificing predictive performance.

Ensuring that classifiers are non-discriminatory or fair with respect to a sensitive feature (e.g., race or gender) is a topical problem. Progress in this task requires fixing a definition of fairness, and there have been several proposals in this regard over the past few years. Several of these, however, assume either…

2019-01-24abs ↗pdf ↗

The paper proposes a fair reinforcement learning framework to prevent healthcare disparities.

problem Unfair reinforcement learning policies in healthcare can lead to socioeconomically-disadvantaged subgroups being underprivileged.
method The paper introduces a counterfactual fairness framework and a sequential data preprocessing algorithm to achieve fair sequential decision making.
result The proposed approach greatly enhances fair access to counseling in a digital health dataset designed to reduce opioid misuse.

Work proposes CLAIRE to achieve counterfactual fairness from observational data without causal models.

problem Achieving counterfactual fairness from observational data without prior causal models.
method Proposes CLAIRE, a representation learning framework based on counterfactual data augmentation and an invariant penalty.
result CLAIRE effectively mitigates biases from the sensitive attribute and improves counterfactual fairness and prediction performance.

The paper investigates how data imbalance affects fairness and accuracy in differentially private deep learning.

problem Impact of data imbalance on fairness and accuracy in differentially private deep learning.
method Study the effects of different levels of imbalance in the data on the accuracy and fairness of decisions made by a model trained with differential privacy.
result Small imbalances and loose privacy guarantees can cause disparate impacts on model accuracy and fairness.