Research
On-device research index

arXiv research

A locally-built, LLM-digested index of recent arXiv papers in quant finance, geometry/topology, and statistical ML — keyword search served straight from SQLite on this machine.

168,657 papers · 148 categories

Trend · papers per month

14284155 · Jun 202019922001200920172026
48 results for private publishing

The paper analyzes and proposes methods for privately sharing individual privacy losses using per-instance differential privacy.

problem The standard differential privacy framework provides a worst-case bound that may not accurately reflect individual privacy losses.
method The paper analyzes per-instance differential privacy and proposes methods to privately and accurately publish per-instance privacy losses.
result The methods privately and accurately publish per-instance differential privacy losses with minimal additional privacy cost.

Matryoshka hides secret models in a carrier model, achieving high capacity and robustness.

problem Stealing functionality of private ML data by hiding models in a carrier model.
method Parameter sharing approach exploiting the learning capacity of the carrier model.
result Hides a 26x larger secret model or 8 secret models in the carrier model.

Private estimation of many quantiles using differential privacy.

problem Estimating quantiles of a distribution privately.
method Two approaches: 1) Private estimation of empirical quantiles, 2) Uniform density estimation.
result There is a tradeoff between estimating quantiles at specific points and uniformly estimating the quantile function.

New method reconstructs data subsets from limited published statistics.

problem Reconstructing tabular data from aggregate statistics when full datasets are not possible.
method Generates and verifies subsets of rows and columns that are guaranteed to be correct.
result Privacy violations can persist even with sparse published statistics.

Principal components analysis (PCA) is a standard tool for identifying good low-dimensional approximations to data in high dimension. Many data sets of interest contain private or sensitive information about individuals. Algorithms which operate on such data should be sensitive to the privacy risks in publishing their …

2012-07-12abs ↗pdf ↗

The paper tests the credibility of public and private surveys using linear regression and differential privacy.

problem Ensuring the validity of data analysis results from sample surveys using linear regression.
method Designing an algorithm to test the credibility of surveys and extending it to handle LDP.
result The algorithm achieves optimal estimation error bound for 1\ell_1 linear regression and reduces sample complexity.

This paper sharpens privacy guarantees for high-dimensional PCA under differential privacy.

problem Understanding the exact privacy loss in high-dimensional PCA with differential privacy.
method Analyzes the exponential mechanism in a model-free setting for high-dimensional PCA.
result Sharp utility and privacy characterizations in high dimensions show the difficulty of detecting a target individual's presence.

This paper presents a method to train a public model with private data using GANs and differential privacy.

problem Privacy concerns in training deep learning models on sensitive data.
method A three-player learning framework with differential privacy protection.
result The proposed method achieves a balance between privacy and model accuracy.

New DP mechanism SWAG-PPM improves privacy in deep learning models.

problem Differential privacy struggles with real-world distributions, especially imbalanced data.
method SWAG-PPM uses a pseudo posterior distribution to downweight high-risk records.
result SWAG-PPM outperforms DP-SGD with similar privacy budget and modest utility degradation.

2020 Census uses more noise to protect privacy than needed, improving data accuracy.

problem Ensuring privacy in census data while maintaining accuracy for policy decisions.
method Applied ff-differential privacy to track and reduce noise across geographical levels.
result The 2020 Census provides stronger privacy protections than its nominal guarantees suggest.

Study local differential privacy methods for estimating power sums of discrete distributions.

problem Estimating non-linear functionals of discrete distributions under local differential privacy constraints.
method Interactive and non-interactive mechanisms for estimating power sums, with lower bounds provided.
result Achieves faster rates of estimation under certain conditions.

TAMIS improves MIA on synthetic data, reducing cost and requiring less knowledge.

problem Empirical assessment of privacy in machine learning algorithms.
method Improves MAMA-MIA by recovering graphical model from synthetic data and introducing a more accurate attack score.
result TAMIS achieves better or similar performance to MAMA-MIA on synthetic data challenges.

Private method measures nonlinear correlations between data hosted across two entities.

problem Measuring nonlinear correlations between sensitive data hosted across multiple parties while preserving privacy.
method Differentially private estimator of distance correlation.
result First private estimator of nonlinear correlations in a multi-party setup.

Near-optimal private tests for simple and MLR hypotheses developed under Gaussian differential privacy.

problem Developing private tests for simple and MLR hypotheses under Gaussian differential privacy.
method A private mean estimator with data-driven clamping bounds, constructing private test statistics.
result Private tests achieve the same asymptotic relative efficiency as non-private most powerful tests.

Public pretraining improves private model training even in extreme distribution shift scenarios.

problem Improving private model training accuracy in settings with large distribution shift.
method Empirical evaluation and theoretical explanation of public representations improving private training accuracy.
result Public representations can improve private training accuracy by up to 67% over private training from scratch in settings with large distribution shift.

Private learning of Gaussian Mixture Models without boundedness assumptions.

problem Private estimation of parameters of Gaussian Mixture Models with unbounded components.
method Reduction to non-private problem, blackbox privatization, Moitra and Valiant's algorithm.
result First sample complexity upper bound and polynomial time algorithm for privately learning GMMs.

Algorithm selects public datasets for private machine learning.

problem Choosing the most suitable public dataset for private machine learning.
method Measures gradient subspace distance between public and private datasets.
result Excess risk scales with the subspace distance between gradients.

Differentially private hyperparameter tuning improves privacy in machine learning.

problem Hyperparameter tuning leaks private information through selected configurations.
method Local Bayesian optimization using Gaussian Process surrogate for private gradient approximation.
result DP-GIBO converges to locally optimal hyperparameters with polynomial dimensional dependence.

We consider learning problems where the training set consists of two types of examples: private and public. The goal is to design a learning algorithm that satisfies differential privacy only with respect to the private examples. This setting interpolates between private learning (where all examples are private) and cl…

2019-10-25abs ↗pdf ↗

Private distribution learning with public data, leveraging sample compression schemes.

problem Private distribution learning with public and private samples under differential privacy constraints.
method Connection to sample compression schemes and list learning.
result At least d public samples are necessary for private learnability of Gaussians in R^d.

In recent years, the economic policy of privatization, which is defined as the transfer of property or responsibility from public sector to private sector, is one of the global phenomenon that increases use of markets to allocate resources. One important motivation for privatization is to help develop factor and produc…

2008-03-17abs ↗pdf ↗

New private learning algorithms improve utility in tasks with public features.

problem Private learning with public features in recommendation and ad prediction.
method Developed algorithms that protect only certain sufficient statistics, improving utility for linear regression and private recommendation benchmarks.
result Achieved state-of-the-art performance on private recommendation benchmarks.

Improved differentially private deep learning with group-wise clipping techniques.

problem Efficiency and privacy trade-offs in deep learning models.
method Group-wise clipping techniques (per-layer and per-device) to reduce compute time and memory overhead.
result Private learning with group-wise clipping achieves similar or better performance than non-private learning with less wall time.

Private learning can perform well in high dimensions, contrary to known results.

problem When does differentially private learning not suffer in high dimensions?
method Introduced a condition called restricted Lipschitz continuity to derive improved bounds for excess empirical and population risks.
result Gradients in private fine-tuning of large models are mostly controlled by a few principal components, similar to conditions for convex settings.

New method for private density estimation of high-dimensional Gaussian mixtures.

problem Private density estimation for mixtures of unrestricted high-dimensional Gaussians.
method Exploits list global stability to prove upper bound on sample complexity.
result First upper bound on sample complexity for agnostic private density estimation.

Private algorithms adapt from public to private domains with minimal labeled data.

problem Adapting from a public source domain to a private target domain with few labeled data.
method Differentially private discrepancy minimization algorithms based on Frank-Wolfe and Mirror-Descent methods.
result Effective adaptation with strong generalization and privacy guarantees.

Applying traditional collaborative filtering to digital publishing is challenging because user data is very sparse due to the high volume of documents relative to the number of users. Content based approaches, on the other hand, is attractive because textual content is often very informative. In this paper we describe …

2015-01-18abs ↗pdf ↗