New method improves consistency of reinforcement learning performance evaluations.
problem Inconsistent performance results in reinforcement learning due to flawed evaluation metrics.
method Proposes a new comprehensive evaluation methodology for reinforcement learning algorithms.
result Demonstrates improved reliability of performance measurements for reinforcement learning algorithms.
Since the introduction and the public availability of the \textsc{ucr} time series benchmark data sets, numerous Time Series Classification (TSC) methods has been designed, evaluated and compared to each others. We suggest a critical view of TSC performance evaluation protocols put in place in recent TSC literature. Th…
Study improves machine learning models for GI tract disease detection using comprehensive evaluations and cross-dataset testing.
problem Incomplete or incorrect evaluation of machine learning models for GI tract diseases.
method Comprehensive evaluations of five machine learning models using Global Features and Deep Neural Networks, introducing performance hexagons and cross-dataset testing.
result Demonstrates the need for more sophisticated performance metrics and evaluation methods to build generalizable models.
This paper evaluates and validates cluster results using external and internal evaluation methods.
problem Evaluating and validating the quality of clustering results.
method External evaluation using Homogeneity, Correctness, and V-measure scores; internal evaluation using Silhouette Index and Sum of Square Errors.
result Validation of the number of clusters using dendrogram and statistical frequency distribution.
This paper considers the challenge of evaluating a set of classifiers, as done in shared task evaluations like the KDD Cup or NIST TREC, without expert labels. While expert labels provide the traditional cornerstone for evaluating statistical learners, limited or expensive access to experts represents a practical bottl…
A new method improves AI fairness assessment by estimating performance across intersectional subgroups.
problem Limited evaluation of AI systems across intersectional subgroups due to small sample sizes.
method Structured regression approach to disaggregated evaluation.
result Our method yields more accurate performance estimates, especially for small subgroups.
PromptEval estimates LLM performance across many prompts, improving reproducibility.
problem Limited prompt templates affect LLM benchmark reproducibility.
method Estimates performance distribution across many prompts using borrowed strength.
result PromptEval accurately estimates performance quantiles with practical budget.
Our research extends the Bilingual Evaluation Understudy (BLEU) evaluation technique for statistical machine translation to make it more adjustable and robust. We intend to adapt it to resemble human evaluation more. We perform experiments to evaluate the performance of our technique against the primary existing evalua…
New causal models perform poorly when evaluated on biased training sets.
problem Sample selection bias affects the evaluation of causal models' prediction performance.
method Re-evaluated prediction performance of causal models on a genetic perturbation data set, proposing a less-biased evaluation set.
result Causal models have similar or worse performance when evaluated on a less-biased set compared to standard association-based estimators.
Develops a method to evaluate OPE robustness to hyperparameters and policies.
problem Difficulty in selecting and tuning OPE estimators due to limited experimental evaluations.
method Introduces IEOE (Interpretable Evaluation for Offline Evaluation) to assess robustness.
result Demonstrates improved evaluation of OPE estimators' reliability.
Deep RL evaluation underestimates uncertainty, leading to misleading conclusions.
problem Statistical uncertainty in deep RL performance evaluations is underestimated, leading to misleading conclusions.
method Advocates for reporting interval estimates of aggregate performance and proposes performance profiles to account for variability.
result Substantial discrepancies in prior performance comparisons are revealed, highlighting the need for more rigorous evaluation methods.
AI benchmarks evaluate football team performance using generative models.
problem Evaluating human performance in complex interactive tasks is error-prone and unreliable.
method Trained Conditional VRNN Model on player and ball tracking data to imitate and predict team interactions.
result Trained model as a useful benchmark for evaluating team performance in football.
New method reduces variance in subpopulation model performance estimates.
problem High variance in subpopulation performance metrics for small groups.
method Using an evaluation model to form model-based metric (MBM) estimates.
result MBMs produce more accurate and lower variance estimates for small subpopulations.
A new framework evaluates deep learning vs classical forecasting methods for time series predictions.
problem Current forecasting model evaluation metrics fail to capture model performance differences.
method Proposes a novel framework for evaluating univariate time series forecasting models from multiple perspectives.
result Deep learning models like NHITS outperform classical methods in multi-step ahead forecasting but not in anomaly handling.
Language model benchmarks often misrepresent true understanding, revealing vulnerabilities in evaluation methods.
problem Language model benchmarks fail to accurately reflect true language understanding and adaptability.
method Systematic analysis of NLP evaluation frameworks, identifying vulnerabilities in static benchmarks, human evaluation protocols, and LLM-as-judge frameworks.
result Current evaluation methods are unreliable and need improvement to accurately assess LLM performance.
The DoD needs a robust process to evaluate AI/ML model performance and robustness.
problem AI/ML models are brittle and nonrobust, posing risks in national security.
method Reviews AI/ML development process and best practices for evaluation.
result Recommendations for DoD evaluators to ensure robust AI/ML capabilities.
This work compares OmniAnomaly with PCA for MTSAD, finding PCA can match or outperform OmniAnomaly.
problem Comparing deep learning models with classical methods in MTSAD under fair evaluation protocols.
method Systematic comparison of OmniAnomaly and PCA on SMD, using identical thresholding and evaluation procedures.
result PCA can achieve performance comparable to OmniAnomaly and even outperform it under certain conditions.
How does one objectively measure the performance of an individual offensive lineman in the NFL? The existing literature proposes various measures that rely on subjective assessments of game film, but has yet to develop an objective methodology to evaluate performance. Using a variety of statistics related to an offensi…
Paper addresses inconsistency between offline and online LTR performance.
problem Inconsistency between offline and online LTR performance in E-commerce.
method Proposes an evaluator-generator framework to maximize evaluator score using reinforcement learning.
result Significant improvement in Conversion Rate (CR) over existing models.
Geospatial ML models need special evaluation methods due to their unique challenges.
problem Evaluating geospatial machine learning models is challenging due to their specific characteristics.
method Delineated unique challenges and proposed concrete takeaways for improving geospatial model evaluations.
result Concrete takeaways for improving evaluations of geospatial model performance.
The true distribution parameterizations of commonly used image datasets are inaccessible. Rather than designing metrics for feature spaces with unknown characteristics, we propose to measure GAN performance by evaluating on explicitly parameterized, synthetic data distributions. As a case study, we examine the performa…
ModelRadar evaluates forecasting models across multiple aspects.
problem Evaluating forecasting models using single scores hides relevant performance variations.
method ModelRadar, a framework for aspect-based evaluation of univariate time series forecasting models.
result NHITS performs best overall but its superiority varies with forecasting conditions.
Improves tree model performance by considering future node splits.
problem Improving tree model performance.
method Next-Depth Lookahead Tree (NDLT) model that evaluates future node splits.
result Enhanced tree model performance.
SureMap estimates model performance across subpopulations efficiently.
problem Estimating model performance across subpopulations with scarce data.
method Simultaneous Gaussian mean estimation with external data.
result High accuracy in both multi-task and single-task disaggregated evaluations.
Deep neural networks are vulnerable to adversarial examples, which becomes one of the most important research problems in the development of deep learning. While a lot of efforts have been made in recent years, it is of great significance to perform correct and complete evaluations of the adversarial attack and defense…
Study compares three performance metrics of Bangladeshi banks.
problem Comparing different performance metrics of commercial banks.
method Empirical framework using MPI, ROA, TSR over 2011-2015.
result Productivity growth was recorded, but profitability and stock performance were negative.
OPERA blends multiple OPE estimators to evaluate new policies offline.
problem Lack of reliable offline policy evaluation methods for new policies.
method Adaptive blending of multiple OPE estimators without explicit selection.
result Consistent and reliable policy evaluation framework for offline RL.
This paper investigates task-level evaluation in few-shot learning models.
problem The reliability of evaluating and tuning models trained for individual tasks in few-shot learning is not well addressed.
method The paper measures accuracy of performance estimators, considers model selection strategies, and examines the reasons for evaluator failure.
result Cross-validation with a low number of folds is best for estimating model performance, while large number of folds is better for model selection.
New method estimates model performance bounds without ground truth labels.
problem Evaluation of weakly supervised models without direct access to ground truth labels.
method Formulates model evaluation as a partial identification problem and uses Fréchet bounds for performance estimation.
result Derives accurate and computationally efficient bounds for key metrics like accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score.
This paper introduces a model of environmental acoustic scenes which adopts a morphological approach by ab-stracting temporal structures of acoustic scenes. To demonstrate its potential, this model is employed to evaluate the performance of a large set of acoustic events detection systems. This model allows us to expli…
ProEval efficiently estimates AI performance and discovers failures using pre-trained Gaussian Processes.
problem Resource-intensive evaluation of generative AI models.
method ProEval uses pre-trained Gaussian Processes and Bayesian quadrature to estimate performance and discover failures.
result ProEval requires significantly fewer samples to achieve accurate performance estimates and reveals more diverse failure cases.
Tiny benchmarks reduce LLM evaluation costs by using fewer examples.
problem Expensive evaluation of LLMs with tens of thousands of examples.
method Developed evaluation tools and tiny versions of popular benchmarks.
result Accurately estimate LLM performance with just 100 curated examples.
Adaptive attacks have (rightfully) become the de facto standard for evaluating defenses to adversarial examples. We find, however, that typical adaptive evaluations are incomplete. We demonstrate that thirteen defenses recently published at ICLR, ICML and NeurIPS---and chosen for illustrative and pedagogical purposes--…
ASEs use surrogate estimation to efficiently evaluate model performance with minimal labels.
problem Efficient model evaluation with limited labels.
method Surrogate-based estimation and active learning.
result ASEs offer greater label-efficiency than current methods for deep neural networks.
Synthetic Petri Dish predicts neural architecture performance faster.
problem Expensive NAS evaluation process with ground-truth data.
method Instantiates motifs in small networks, evaluates with few synthetic samples.
result Significantly higher accuracy in predicting motif performance.
The problem of automatic and accurate forecasting of time-series data has always been an interesting challenge for the machine learning and forecasting community. A majority of the real-world time-series problems have non-stationary characteristics that make the understanding of trend and seasonality difficult. Our int…
Machine Learning (ML) and Deep Learning (DL) innovations are being introduced at such a rapid pace that researchers are hard-pressed to analyze and study them. The complicated procedures for evaluating innovations, along with the lack of standard and efficient ways of specifying and provisioning ML/DL evaluation, is a …
Study evaluates financial misstatement detection methods, highlighting evaluation process impact.
problem Detecting financial reports with high misstatement risk.
method Proposes a new, realistic evaluation framework focusing on misstatement rarity, time dimension, and detection latency.
result Evaluation process significantly impacts system performance, revealing model and feature type effectiveness.
Cramming method evaluates learned policies from contextual bandits efficiently.
problem Evaluating final learned policies from contextual bandit algorithms.
method On-policy evaluation using a single pass of data, ensuring consistency and asymptotic normality.
result Cramming method reduces evaluation standard error by approximately 40% compared to off-policy methods.
New approach for pricing evaluation improves on existing methods.
problem Improving off-policy evaluation for personalized pricing.
method Balanced policy evaluation framework with worst-case optimization.
result Empirical advantage over existing methods in pricing applications.
Proposes MCC-F1 curve for better binary classification evaluation.
problem Misleading performance evaluations with ROC and PR curves for imbalanced data.
method Introduces MCC-F1 curve combining MCC and F1 score.
result MCC-F1 curve provides clearer classifier differentiation.
Suitability filter detects model performance degradation in real-world deployment.
problem Ensuring model reliability in safety-critical domains without access to ground truth labels.
method Uses suitability signals to evaluate classifier performance on unlabeled user data.
result The suitability filter reliably detects performance deviations due to covariate shift.
A new method evaluates invariant performance of IRM-based representations.
problem Impact of data changes on machine learning model performance.
method Proposes a novel method to evaluate invariant performance of IRM-based representations.
result Establishes a robust criterion to assess invariant performance of various representation techniques.
Study limits of testing algorithms without assumptions, finding key performance bounds.
problem Understanding algorithm performance without making assumptions.
method Exploring fundamental limits of algorithm performance testing.
result Hardness results for evaluating algorithm performance and comparing multiple algorithms.
This paper tackles label-efficient evaluation in extreme class imbalance.
problem Challenges in obtaining a sufficient sample for accurate evaluation in tasks with extreme class imbalance.
method Develops a framework for online evaluation based on adaptive importance sampling.
result Establishes strong consistency and a central limit theorem for performance estimates.
The paper tackles sampling bias in credit scoring models and proposes methods to improve their training and evaluation.
problem Sampling bias in credit scoring models leads to an incomplete representation of the borrower population.
method Bias-aware self-learning framework and Bayesian evaluation method to correct for bias.
result Bayesian evaluation outperforms standard accuracy measures in predicting future performance.
PS-DME evaluates model performance and reliability after data-dependent selection.
problem Evaluating model performance and reliability when data is used for selection and evaluation.
method Post-selection distributional model evaluation (PS-DME) using e-values to control false coverage rate.
result PS-DME provides reliable comparison of model configurations across different reliability levels.
Validates policies using past observational data with guarantees about out-of-sample performance.
problem Evaluating decision policies using past data observed under a different policy.
method Sample-splitting method to draw inferences about the entire loss distribution with finite-sample coverage guarantees.
result Valid inferences about out-of-sample loss with finite-sample coverage guarantees, accounting for model misspecifications.