Research
On-device research index

arXiv research

A locally-built, LLM-digested index of recent arXiv papers in quant finance, geometry/topology, and statistical ML — keyword search served straight from SQLite on this machine.

168,657 papers · 148 categories

Trend · papers per month

3468102136 · May 202619922001200920172026
48 results for pairwise ranking

Develops a statistical framework to measure uncertainty in model rankings based on human preferences.

problem Uncertainty in model rankings based on human preferences due to mismatch between human and model preferences.
method Statistical framework using pairwise comparisons by humans and models to provide rank-sets for each model.
result Rank-sets constructed using only pairwise comparisons by strong models often do not cover the true ranking of human preferences.

This paper examines the problem of ranking a collection of objects using pairwise comparisons (rankings of two objects). In general, the ranking of nn objects can be identified by standard sorting methods using nlog2nn log_2 n pairwise comparisons. We are interested in natural situations in which relationships among the o…

2011-09-16abs ↗pdf ↗

We study the problem of ranking from crowdsourced pairwise comparisons. Answers to pairwise tasks are known to be affected by the position of items on the screen, however, previous models for aggregation of pairwise comparisons do not focus on modeling such kind of biases. We introduce a new aggregation model factorBT …

2019-06-09abs ↗pdf ↗

We describe a seriation algorithm for ranking a set of items given pairwise comparisons between these items. Intuitively, the algorithm assigns similar rankings to items that compare similarly with all others. It does so by constructing a similarity matrix from pairwise comparisons, using seriation methods to reorder t…

2014-06-20abs ↗pdf ↗

Rank regression from pairwise comparisons requires many comparisons to accurately learn model parameters.

problem Learning model parameters for rank regression from noisy pairwise comparisons.
method Uniform random pairwise comparisons to estimate model parameters with a given accuracy.
result Learning model parameters requires a number of comparisons proportional to dNlog3N/ε2dN\log^3 N/ε^2.

GNNRank uses neural networks to learn global rankings from competition match data.

problem Learning global rankings from pairwise comparisons in directed graphs.
method Proposes GNNRank, a trainable GNN-based framework with digraph embedding and new objectives.
result GNNRank achieves competitive and superior performance compared to baselines.

Exact pairwise ranking is achievable but not possible under noisy comparisons.

problem Recovering the exact rank of items from noisy pairwise comparisons.
method Information-theoretic upper and lower bounds using the SST model and combinatorial arguments.
result Sharp information-theoretic bounds match in the parametric limit and outperform previous methods.

We study the problem of ranking a set of items from nonactively chosen pairwise preferences where each item has feature information with it. We propose and characterize a very broad class of preference matrices giving rise to the Feature Low Rank (FLR) model, which subsumes several models ranging from the classic Bradl…

2017-02-09abs ↗pdf ↗

The paper designs tests for comparing ranked preference data and finds significant differences.

problem Comparing pairwise comparison and ranking data in various applications.
method Developed two-sample tests for pairwise comparison and ranking data, proving upper and lower bounds.
result Upper and lower bounds show tightness of the proposed tests, and significant differences in preferences were found.

We present pairwise fairness metrics for ranking models and regression models that form analogues of statistical fairness notions such as equal opportunity, equal accuracy, and statistical parity. Our pairwise formulation supports both discrete protected groups, and continuous protected attributes. We show that the res…

2019-06-12abs ↗pdf ↗

A common problem in machine learning is to rank a set of n items based on pairwise comparisons. Here ranking refers to partitioning the items into sets of pre-specified sizes according to their scores, which includes identification of the top-k items as the most prominent special case. The score of a given item is defi…

2018-01-04abs ↗pdf ↗

Given a measurement graph G=(V,E)G= (V,E) and an unknown signal rRnr \in \mathbb{R}^n, we investigate algorithms for recovering rr from pairwise measurements of the form rirjr_i - r_j; {i,j}E\{i,j\} \in E. This problem arises in a variety of applications, such as ranking teams in sports data and time synchronization of distribute…

2019-06-06abs ↗pdf ↗

Recommender systems are one of the most pervasive applications of machine learning in industry, with many services using them to match users to products or information. As such it is important to ask: what are the possible fairness risks, how can we quantify them, and how should we address them? In this paper we offer …

2019-03-02abs ↗pdf ↗

Protocol for constructing tailored evaluation datasets for semantic models.

problem Evaluation of domain-specific semantic models, focusing on top ranks.
method Adaptive pairwise comparisons, relatedness-based evaluation dataset, metrics, stochastic transitivity model.
result Effectiveness of the proposed dataset construction protocol confirmed.

New model accounts for scale variation and noise in pairwise comparisons.

problem Nonreciprocal pairwise comparisons in decision analysis.
method Additive model with structured matrix and random perturbation.
result Explicit estimators and probability assessments of admissible ranking regions.

Pairwise ranking aligns subjective clinical evaluations with objective indicators.

problem Aligning subjective clinical evaluations with objective indicators for improved diagnosis.
method Pairwise ranking methods to align subjective evaluations with objective indicators.
result The resulting score improves classification accuracy and provides a nuanced severity assessment.

Rank aggregation systems collect ordinal preferences from individuals to produce a global ranking that represents the social preference. Rank-breaking is a common practice to reduce the computational complexity of learning the global ranking. The individual preferences are broken into pairwise comparisons and applied t…

2016-01-21abs ↗pdf ↗

We present an attention-based ranking framework for learning to order sentences given a paragraph. Our framework is built on a bidirectional sentence encoder and a self-attention based transformer network to obtain an input order invariant representation of paragraphs. Moreover, it allows seamless training using a vari…

2019-12-31abs ↗pdf ↗

We consider data in the form of pairwise comparisons of n items, with the goal of precisely identifying the top k items for some value of k < n, or alternatively, recovering a ranking of all the items. We analyze the Copeland counting algorithm that ranks the items in order of the number of pairwise comparisons won, an…

2015-12-30abs ↗pdf ↗

The report studies ranking from pairwise comparisons in graphs, achieving optimal error bounds and proposing efficient algorithms.

problem Ranking items from pairwise comparisons in general graphs and graphs with locality.
method Maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) and preconditioned gradient descent for general graphs; divide-and-conquer algorithms for graphs with locality.
result MLE achieves optimal error bounds in general graphs and identifies conditions for locality.

Factorization machines (FM) are a popular model class to learn pairwise interactions by a low-rank approximation. Different from existing FM-based approaches which use a fixed rank for all features, this paper proposes a Rank-Aware FM (RaFM) model which adopts pairwise interactions from embeddings with different ranks.…

2019-05-18abs ↗pdf ↗

Low-rank framework for task-specific LLM ranking from sparse comparisons.

problem Challenges in reliable task-specific ranking of LLMs under sparse, imbalanced comparisons.
method Low-rank modeling of task-by-model ability matrix, max-norm accurate estimator, task-wise top-K recovery guarantees, uncertainty quantification framework.
result Improves sample efficiency and produces tighter, better-calibrated ranking certificates.

In this paper, we propose a listwise approach for constructing user-specific rankings in recommendation systems in a collaborative fashion. We contrast the listwise approach to previous pointwise and pairwise approaches, which are based on treating either each rating or each pairwise comparison as an independent instan…

2018-02-28abs ↗pdf ↗

The paper addresses calibration in label ranking, a structured prediction task.

problem Calibration in label ranking is not well understood and often poorly calibrated.
method Formalized calibration for label ranking, developed a hierarchy of notions, and empirically evaluated models.
result Popular label ranking models are often poorly calibrated, with differences between sub-ranking and top-k metrics.

Unified framework for binary responses using AUC loss and low-rank constraint.

problem Statistical inefficiency and shared structure in fitting multiple binary responses.
method Pairwise AUC loss aggregation with low-rank constraint, scalable projected gradient descent.
result Unified framework outperforms likelihood-based approaches in challenging settings.

We propose a topic modeling approach to the prediction of preferences in pairwise comparisons. We develop a new generative model for pairwise comparisons that accounts for multiple shared latent rankings that are prevalent in a population of users. This new model also captures inconsistent user behavior in a natural wa…

2014-12-11abs ↗pdf ↗