Research
On-device research index

arXiv research

A locally-built, LLM-digested index of recent arXiv papers in quant finance, geometry/topology, and statistical ML — keyword search served straight from SQLite on this machine.

168,742 papers · 148 categories

Trend · papers per month

6491,2981,9462,595 · Jun 202019922001200920172026
48 results for natural measures of fairness

Fair HAC algorithms ensure clustering fairness across protected groups.

problem Ensuring clustering fairness in HAC algorithms when datasets contain biases.
method Proposes fair algorithms for HAC that enforce fairness constraints regardless of distance linkage criteria.
result Our fair HAC algorithms find fairer clusterings compared to vanilla HAC and other fair clustering approaches.

Fairness in machine learning has predominantly been studied in static classification settings without concern for how decisions change the underlying population over time. Conventional wisdom suggests that fairness criteria promote the long-term well-being of those groups they aim to protect. We study how static fairne…

2018-03-12abs ↗pdf ↗

Standardized fairness measures for continuous risk scores using Wasserstein distance.

problem Quantifying and interpreting group disparities in continuous risk scores.
method Proposes standardized fairness measures based on Wasserstein distance for continuous scores.
result Proposed measures outperform ROC-based fairness measures by being more explicit and quantifying significant biases.

FADE framework improves fairness and accuracy in ensemble learning.

problem Improving fairness in existing models without sacrificing accuracy.
method Flexible fair ensemble learning framework targeting multiple fairness criteria.
result Multiple unfairness measures can be minimized simultaneously with little impact on accuracy.

Develops methods for fair classification under linear disparity constraints.

problem Disparate impacts of machine learning algorithms on protected groups.
method Bayes-optimal fair classification methods via pre-, in-, and post-processing.
result Explicit forms of Bayes-optimal fair classifiers under linear disparity measures.

The paper tackles fair classification with multiple sensitive features.

problem Existing fair classification methods often consider a single sensitive feature, but in practice, individuals are defined by multiple sensitive features.
method Characterizes Bayes-optimal fair classifiers for multiple sensitive features under various fairness measures, proposing in-processing and post-processing algorithms.
result Bayes-optimal fair classifiers for multiple sensitive features are instance-dependent thresholding rules that rely on a weighted sum of group membership probabilities.

In this paper, we study counterfactual fairness in text classification, which asks the question: How would the prediction change if the sensitive attribute referenced in the example were different? Toxicity classifiers demonstrate a counterfactual fairness issue by predicting that "Some people are gay" is toxic while "…

2018-09-27abs ↗pdf ↗

Fairness measures fail in predictive settings that intentionally shift outcomes.

problem Fairness measures fail in performative prediction settings.
method Formalized concept shift and counterfactual outcomes.
result Predictors that are fair during training become unfair during deployment.

A new fairness metric for decision-making algorithms, conditioning on known fair variables.

problem Fairness issues in decision-making systems.
method Conditional fairness metric, Derivable Conditional Fairness Regularizer (DCFR), adversarial representation.
result Traditional fairness notations are special cases of the new conditional fairness notation.

The paper explores the tradeoffs between fairness measures in machine learning.

problem The challenge of achieving all three fairness notions simultaneously in machine learning models.
method The approach uses partial information decomposition (PID) to analyze the relationships between fairness measures.
result Identifies the regions where fairness measures overlap and disagree, revealing potential tradeoffs.

New fairness criterion for risk-sensitive decisions in regulated industries.

problem Ensuring equitable outcomes in risk-sensitive decision-making.
method Marginal fairness for generalized distortion risk measures, two-step decision-making process.
result Ensures fairness in decision-making under risk measures, regardless of protected attributes.

Proposes measuring fairness through multiple stakeholder-curated stress tests.

problem Limited power of rigid fairness metrics and lack of stakeholder involvement in fairness discussions.
method Shift focus from fairness metrics to stress tests curated by stakeholders.
result Machine's performance under multiple stress tests reflects fairness.

The paper explores fairness in credit scoring using machine learning.

problem The lack of research on fair machine learning in credit scoring.
method Revisits statistical fairness criteria, catalogs algorithmic options, and empirically compares fairness processors.
result Multiple fairness criteria can be approximately satisfied at once, and fair processors deliver a good balance between profit and fairness.

Proposes a new metric for financial risk based on volatility's local deviations.

problem Inefficiencies in classical risk metrics like volatility.
method Introduces pointwise regularity via the Hurst-Holder exponent.
result A more nuanced assessment of market inefficiencies and mechanisms for restoring equilibrium.

The paper connects counterfactual fairness to robust prediction and group fairness using causal context.

problem The challenge of ensuring fairness in AI systems when counterfactuals cannot be directly observed.
method Using causal context to bridge counterfactual fairness, robust prediction, and group fairness.
result Counterfactual fairness is equivalent to group fairness metrics in specific contexts.

This paper introduces efficient approximations for fairness criteria in regression models.

problem Measuring fairness in real-valued outcomes (regression settings) is computationally challenging.
method Fast approximations of mutual information for independence, separation, and sufficiency fairness criteria.
result The method achieves state-of-the-art accuracy/fairness tradeoffs in real-world datasets.

One often finds in the literature connections between measures of fairness and measures of feature importance employed to interpret trained classifiers. However, there seems to be no study that compares fairness measures and feature importance measures. In this paper we propose ways to evaluate and compare such measure…

2019-10-12abs ↗pdf ↗

Sampling methods that choose a subset of the data proportional to its diversity in the feature space are popular for data summarization. However, recent studies have noted the occurrence of bias (under- or over-representation of a certain gender or race) in such data summarization methods. In this paper we initiate a s…

2018-02-12abs ↗pdf ↗

PAC-Bayesian framework for fairness in stochastic and deterministic classifiers.

problem Theoretical guarantees on fairness for balancing predictive risk and fairness constraints.
method PAC-Bayesian framework for both stochastic and deterministic classifiers, covering a broad class of fairness measures.
result Derives generalization bounds for fairness, demonstrating tightness with empirical evaluation.

The paper introduces a model to measure ASR fairness, addressing key issues.

problem Measuring fairness in ASR systems for different subgroups.
method Mixed-effects Poisson regression to control nuisance factors and handle unobserved heterogeneity.
result The method effectively addresses WER gaps among subgroups and is flexible for practical analyses.

New fairness approach removes direct effects of unprivileged groups through causal regularization.

problem Ensuring fairness in machine learning models for unprivileged groups.
method Proposes a new fairness definition based on causal effects and develops regularizations to remove the impact of unprivileged groups on model outcomes.
result Demonstrates effectiveness of the approach on various datasets, reducing unfairness with minimal performance loss.

Whereas previous post-processing approaches for increasing the fairness of predictions of biased classifiers address only group fairness, we propose a method for increasing both individual and group fairness. Our novel framework includes an individual bias detector used to prioritize data samples in a bias mitigation a…

2018-12-14abs ↗pdf ↗

Develops methods to measure and reduce fairness in datasets with limited protected attribute labels.

problem Measuring and reducing fairness in datasets with limited protected attribute labels.
method Proposes methods to estimate fairness metrics and train models to limit fairness violations using probabilistic protected attribute labels.
result Our methods provide tighter bounds on true disparity and effectively reduce fairness violations with lesser fairness-accuracy trade-offs.

Machine learning practitioners are often ambivalent about the ethical aspects of their products. We believe anything that gets us from that current state to one in which our systems are achieving some degree of fairness is an improvement that should be welcomed. This is true even when that progress does not get us 100%…

2018-06-13abs ↗pdf ↗

Study examines auditing fairness in evolving models, identifying strategic updates that preserve audit properties.

problem Auditing fairness in machine learning models that adapt to changing environments.
method Characterizes strategic updates that preserve audit properties, proposes a generic PAC auditing framework.
result Establishes distribution-free auditing bounds for statistical parity using the SP dimension.