Research
On-device research index

arXiv research

A locally-built, LLM-digested index of recent arXiv papers in quant finance, geometry/topology, and statistical ML — keyword search served straight from SQLite on this machine.

168,742 papers · 148 categories

Trend · papers per month

3571106141 · Jun 202019922001200920172026
48 results for marginal fairness

Proposes MFSWB for marginal fairness in SWB, improving efficiency and performance.

problem Achieving marginal fairness in SWB averaging.
method Defining MFSWB as a constrained SWB problem, proposing two surrogate problems and a new slicing distribution.
result Surrogate MFSWB problems effectively minimize distances to marginals and encourage marginal fairness.

A new algorithm COVA-FC improves subgroup-fair clustering efficiency.

problem Challenges in making cluster assignments independent of sensitive attributes in subgroups.
method Defining a subgroup-fairness gap, deriving a covariance-based surrogate, and introducing a continuous relaxation for efficient optimization.
result COVA-FC achieves competitive cost-fairness trade-offs and improves computational efficiency.

The paper explores intersectional fairness in machine learning, proving bounds on it.

problem Intersectional fairness in machine learning, especially when multiple protected attributes are involved.
method Statistical analysis and bounds on intersectional fairness, leveraging marginal fairness.
result Theoretical bounds on intersectional fairness can be computed from marginal fairness and other statistical quantities.

In critical decision-making scenarios, optimizing accuracy can lead to a biased classifier, hence past work recommends enforcing group-based fairness metrics in addition to maximizing accuracy. However, doing so exposes the classifier to another kind of bias called infra-marginality. This refers to individual-level bia…

2019-09-03abs ↗pdf ↗

New fairness criterion for risk-sensitive decisions in regulated industries.

problem Ensuring equitable outcomes in risk-sensitive decision-making.
method Marginal fairness for generalized distortion risk measures, two-step decision-making process.
result Ensures fairness in decision-making under risk measures, regardless of protected attributes.

Algorithmic fairness is a field of study that addresses the systematic disadvantage of marginalized groups in machine learning systems.

problem Modern machine learning systems increasingly determine access to economic and social opportunities, leading to structural inequalities and prejudices.
method Statistical and structural approaches to algorithmic fairness.
result The field of algorithmic fairness emerged to address the systematic disadvantage of marginalized groups in machine learning systems.

Kearns et al. [2018] recently proposed a notion of rich subgroup fairness intended to bridge the gap between statistical and individual notions of fairness. Rich subgroup fairness picks a statistical fairness constraint (say, equalizing false positive rates across protected groups), but then asks that this constraint h…

2018-08-24abs ↗pdf ↗

This paper works out fair values of stock loan model with automatic termination clause, cap and margin. This stock loan is treated as a generalized perpetual American option with possibly negative interest rate and some constraints. Since it helps a bank to control the risk, the banks charge less service fees compared …

2010-05-09abs ↗pdf ↗

Privacy affects fairness in classification models, but not drastically.

problem The impact of differential privacy on fairness in classification models.
method Theoretical analysis proving Lipschitz continuity of fairness measures and a non-asymptotic bound on fairness levels.
result Privacy impacts fairness, but not significantly as the number of samples increases.

Developing learning methods which do not discriminate subgroups in the population is a central goal of algorithmic fairness. One way to reach this goal is by modifying the data representation in order to meet certain fairness constraints. In this work we measure fairness according to demographic parity. This requires t…

2019-06-25abs ↗pdf ↗

Develops a method for fairness in multi-task learning using Wasserstein barycenters.

problem Extending fairness to multi-task learning with shared representations.
method Definition of Strong Demographic Parity extended to multi-task learning using multi-marginal Wasserstein barycenters. Closed form solution for optimal fair predictor.
result Empirical results show practical value of post-processing methodology in promoting fair decision-making.

New algorithm tackles subgroup fairness in AI with multiple sensitive attributes.

problem Heavy computational burdens and data sparsity in subgroup fairness for multiple sensitive attributes.
method Doubly Regressing Adversarial learning (DRAF) for subgroup fairness, focusing on subgroups with sufficient sample sizes and marginal fairness.
result DRAF algorithm reduces a surrogate fairness gap for supIPM with less computation than directly reducing supIPM.

Introduces lookahead counterfactual fairness to account for downstream effects of ML predictions.

problem Downstream effects of ML predictions on individuals not considered by counterfactual fairness.
method Introduces lookahead counterfactual fairness (LCF), a new fairness notion that considers future status. Proposes an algorithm based on theoretical conditions.
result Proposes an algorithm to achieve lookahead counterfactual fairness and validates it on synthetic and real data.

Paper examines fairness of data augmentation methods, finding vanilla Mixup outperforms Fair Mixup.

problem Improving fairness in classification models with limited minority data.
method Uses multicalibration to rigorously evaluate and improve data augmentation methods for classification fairness.
result Vanilla Mixup outperforms Fair Mixup and baseline methods in fairness and accuracy, especially with small minority groups.

The adoption of automated, data-driven decision making in an ever expanding range of applications has raised concerns about its potential unfairness towards certain social groups. In this context, a number of recent studies have focused on defining, detecting, and removing unfairness from data-driven decision systems. …

2017-06-30abs ↗pdf ↗

This paper tackles fair online decision-making in contextual bandits, achieving optimal performance and fairness.

problem Fairness in online decision-making systems under strategic manipulation.
method Develops algorithms for linear and smooth reward functions, maintaining fairness and optimal regret.
result Achieves nearly minimax-optimal regret with strong fairness guarantees, even in the presence of attacks.

The study connects fairness constraints with optimal transport to derive new insights in classification.

problem Ensuring fairness in classification models without sacrificing performance.
method Using Wasserstein barycenters and optimal transport, the study characterizes optimal classification functions under fairness constraints.
result Maximizing fairness under demographic parity is equivalent to solving a regression problem.

L-ARC improves model fairness by localizing risk guarantees.

problem Improving model fairness in tasks like image segmentation and wireless networks.
method Localized Adaptive Risk Control (L-ARC) updates a threshold function in RKHS to target localized statistical risk guarantees.
result L-ARC produces prediction sets with improved fairness across different data subpopulations.

Medical imaging models may encode demographic attributes without violating fairness, depending on the approach.

problem Discrimination in medical imaging models due to encoding demographic attributes.
method Examined marginal and class-conditional representation invariance, traditional fairness notions, and counterfactual fairness.
result Demographically invariant models may not necessarily be fair, and encoding demographic attributes can be advantageous.

Fairness is becoming a rising concern w.r.t. machine learning model performance. Especially for sensitive fields such as criminal justice and loan decision, eliminating the prediction discrimination towards a certain group of population (characterized by sensitive features like race and gender) is important for enhanci…

2019-09-06abs ↗pdf ↗

DQ4FairIM uses RL to maximize influence while ensuring fairness across all groups.

problem Fairness in influence maximization in social networks.
method Fairness-aware deep RL method using Structure2Vec network embedding.
result DQ4FairIM achieves higher fairness than fairness-agnostic and fairness-aware baselines.

Machine Learning community is recently exploring the implications of bias and fairness with respect to the AI applications. The definition of fairness for such applications varies based on their domain of application. The policies governing the use of such machine learning system in a given context are defined by the c…

2018-09-12abs ↗pdf ↗

The paper addresses bias amplification in prediction and decision-making using causal analysis.

problem Bias amplification in automated systems, especially after thresholding.
method Introduces margin complement and causal decomposition of prediction disparities.
result Disparity in predictor Y^\widehat Y can be decomposed into causal influences of XX on SS and MM.

Study reveals AI skin cancer classifiers underperform for darker skin phototypes, advocating for fairness auditing.

problem AI bias in dermatology, particularly for darker skin phototypes.
method Predictive Representativity (PR) framework, evaluating classifiers on HAM10000 and BOSQUE Test sets.
result Substantial performance disparities by skin phototype, highlighting AI bias.

We relax demographic parity in regression by enforcing parity at quantile levels and score thresholds.

problem Enforcing full distributional fairness in regression can lead to substantial accuracy loss.
method Introduce (\ell, Z)-fair predictor, derive closed-form solutions, and develop post-processing algorithm.
result The risk gap to the continuous optimum vanishes as the grid is refined, and we enable targeted fairness corrections.

The paper tackles multi-level fairness in algorithmic systems, addressing bias at both individual and structural levels.

problem Algorithmic systems can unfairly impact marginalized groups, especially when considering only individual-level bias.
method Formalizes multi-level fairness using causal inference tools, addressing effects of sensitive attributes at multiple levels.
result Illustrates the importance of accounting for macro-level sensitive attributes in fairness assessments.

Bielecki and Rutkowski (2014) introduced and studied a generic nonlinear market model, which includes several risky assets, multiple funding accounts and margin accounts. In this paper, we examine the pricing and hedging of contract both from the perspective of the hedger and the counterparty with arbitrary initial end…

2014-10-02abs ↗pdf ↗

This article prices OTC derivatives with either an exogenously determined initial margin profile or endogenously approximated initial margin. In the former case, margin valuation adjustment (MVA) is defined as the liability-side discounted expected margin profile, while in the latter, an extended partial differential e…

2015-12-23abs ↗pdf ↗

A new method improves data representation for diverse tasks.

problem Learning meaningful representations for tasks like batch correction and counterfactual inference.
method Contrastive Mixture of Posteriors (CoMP) method using misalignment penalties.
result CoMP achieves state-of-the-art performance on challenging tasks.

Study finds actuarial unfairness in China's pension system, proposing income-dependent annuitization rules.

problem Actuarial fairness in China's NDC pension system when mortality differs across income groups.
method Developed a mortality-differentiated Lee-Carter framework with group-specific baseline mortality schedules and a common period effect, estimated using national and subgroup data.
result Substantial actuarial unfairness in the current age-only divisor, with a reverse transfer from poorer to richer retirees.

New benchmark predicts cardiometabolic risk from accelerometer data, with varying accuracy.

problem Lack of accurate tabular benchmarks for cardiometabolic risk from accelerometer data.
method Tabular learning methods (ridge regression, XGBoost, TabPFN v2) applied to NHANES data.
result TabPFN v2 achieves best performance, but triglycerides remain largely unpredictable.

UMFI improves feature importance methods by reducing runtime and enhancing performance.

problem Improving feature importance methods to better explain causal and associative relationships in data.
method Introducing UMFI, which uses dependence removal techniques from AI fairness literature.
result UMFI outperforms MCI, especially in complex data scenarios, and reduces runtime from exponential to super-linear.

Conformal prediction sets can lead to unfair outcomes.

problem Disparate impact in decision-making with conformal prediction sets.
method Experiments with human participants to demonstrate disparate impact and propose equalizing set sizes across groups.
result Providing prediction sets that satisfy Equalized Coverage increases disparate impact compared to marginal coverage.

Jeffrey guidance extends diffusion-model control to more complex applications.

problem Controlling diffusion models beyond simple cases like conditional sampling.
method Leveraging Jeffrey's rule of conditioning to update marginal distributions towards a target distribution.
result Significant reductions in FID on CIFAR-10 and FFHQ with Inception embeddings as the target.