Research
On-device research index

arXiv research

A locally-built, LLM-digested index of recent arXiv papers in quant finance, geometry/topology, and statistical ML — keyword search served straight from SQLite on this machine.

168,695 papers · 148 categories

Trend · papers per month

80161241321 · Jun 202019922001200920172026
48 results for label ranking

DM2L tackles missing labels in multi-label learning by modeling local and global rank structures.

problem Missing labels in multi-label learning.
method DM2L imposes local low-rank structures and global high-rank structures on predictions of instances from the same and different labels, respectively.
result DM2L outperforms state-of-the-art methods in multi-label learning with missing labels.

Label ranking is a prediction task which deals with learning a mapping between an instance and a ranking (i.e., order) of labels from a finite set, representing their relevance to the instance. Boosting is a well-known and reliable ensemble technique that was shown to often outperform other learning algorithms. While b…

2020-01-21abs ↗pdf ↗

The paper tackles multi-label ranking with uncertain probabilities.

problem Making skeptical inferences for multi-label ranking with sets of probabilities.
method Assumes a convex set of probabilities (credal set) over labels and seeks set-valued predictions.
result Developed methods for making skeptical inferences in multi-label ranking with uncertain probabilities.

The paper addresses calibration in label ranking, a structured prediction task.

problem Calibration in label ranking is not well understood and often poorly calibrated.
method Formalized calibration for label ranking, developed a hierarchy of notions, and empirically evaluated models.
result Popular label ranking models are often poorly calibrated, with differences between sub-ranking and top-k metrics.

We consider the multi-label ranking approach to multi-label learning. Boosting is a natural method for multi-label ranking as it aggregates weak predictions through majority votes, which can be directly used as scores to produce a ranking of the labels. We design online boosting algorithms with provable loss bounds for…

2017-10-23abs ↗pdf ↗

Label ranking aims to learn a mapping from instances to rankings over a finite number of predefined labels. Random forest is a powerful and one of the most successful general-purpose machine learning algorithms of modern times. In this paper, we present a powerful random forest label ranking method which uses random de…

2016-08-27abs ↗pdf ↗

This research tackles multiclass classification by introducing a method for label ranking.

problem The challenge is to predict a sorted list of labels based on input features.
method Inspired by ranking median regression, the One-Versus-One (OVO) approach is used to achieve optimal ranking.
result The OVO approach yields an optimal ranking of labels with overwhelming probability under noise conditions.

This paper presents privileged multi-label learning (PrML) to explore and exploit the relationship between labels in multi-label learning problems. We suggest that for each individual label, it cannot only be implicitly connected with other labels via the low-rank constraint over label predictors, but also its performa…

2017-01-25abs ↗pdf ↗

Deep networks learn clean structure before memorizing corrupted labels, leaving a spectral signature in gradient centered scatter.

problem Deep networks' transition from learning clean structure to memorizing corrupted labels under label noise.
method Analysis of the centered scatter of per-example last-layer gradients to identify Fisher Rank Inflation.
result Fisher Rank Inflation is a spectral signature of memorization under label noise, with effective rank expanding during memorization.

The real-world data is often susceptible to label noise, which might constrict the effectiveness of the existing state of the art algorithms for ordinal regression. Existing works on ordinal regression do not take label noise into account. We propose a theoretically grounded approach for class conditional label noise i…

2019-12-07abs ↗pdf ↗

Adversarial examples are delicately perturbed inputs, which aim to mislead machine learning models towards incorrect outputs. While most of the existing work focuses on generating adversarial perturbations in multi-class classification problems, many real-world applications fall into the multi-label setting in which on…

2019-01-02abs ↗pdf ↗

We study an extreme scenario in multi-label learning where each training instance is endowed with a single one-bit label out of multiple labels. We formulate this problem as a non-trivial special case of one-bit rank-one matrix sensing and develop an efficient non-convex algorithm based on alternating power iteration. …

2017-03-17abs ↗pdf ↗

Extreme Multi-label classification (XML) is an important yet challenging machine learning task, that assigns to each instance its most relevant candidate labels from an extremely large label collection, where the numbers of labels, features and instances could be thousands or millions. XML is more and more on demand in…

2019-04-11abs ↗pdf ↗

New framework learns labels at both bag and graph levels.

problem Learning multi-label classifiers from multi-graph bags.
method Designing scoring functions and rank-loss objective for graph and bag levels; developing sub-gradient descent algorithm.
result Superior performance over state-of-the-art algorithms.

This paper improves multi-label ranking by reweighting univariate losses, enhancing consistency and performance.

problem Improving multi-label ranking performance while maintaining consistency.
method Systematic study of consistency and generalization error bounds for learning algorithms, proposing a reweighted univariate loss.
result Inconsistent pairwise losses can lead to better performance than consistent univariate losses in practice.

We propose a simple and efficient method for ranking features in multi-label classification. The method produces a ranking of features showing their relevance in predicting labels, which in turn allows to choose a final subset of features. The procedure is based on Markov Networks and allows to model the dependencies b…

2016-02-24abs ↗pdf ↗

OpinionRank uses graph-based ranking to improve unreliable crowdsourced labels.

problem Improving trustworthiness of crowdsourced labels for machine learning.
method Graph-based spectral ranking to integrate unreliable labels.
result OpinionRank outperforms conventional algorithms in reliability and scalability.

TA-VAAL improves active learning by better utilizing task structures and overall data distribution.

problem High labeling cost limits deep learning applications; active learning selects informative samples.
method Task-aware variational adversarial active learning (TA-VAAL) modifies VAAL by relaxing task loss prediction and using ranking loss information.
result TA-VAAL outperforms state-of-the-arts on various datasets, including balanced and imbalanced labels.

We propose to solve a label ranking problem as a structured output regression task. We adopt a least square surrogate loss approach that solves a supervised learning problem in two steps: the regression step in a well-chosen feature space and the pre-image step. We use specific feature maps/embeddings for ranking data,…

2018-07-06abs ↗pdf ↗

List-wise learning to rank methods are considered to be the state-of-the-art. One of the major problems with these methods is that the ambiguous nature of relevance labels in learning to rank data is ignored. Ambiguity of relevance labels refers to the phenomenon that multiple documents may be assigned the same relevan…

2017-07-24abs ↗pdf ↗

We simplify SSL by approximating redundant structural components with low-rank factorization.

problem Improving self-supervised learning performance with limited labeled data.
method Low-rank approximation of structural redundancy, introducing ε_s to measure approximation quality.
result The proposed method enhances SSL performance, as shown by theoretical and experimental validations.

The objective in extreme multi-label learning is to train a classifier that can automatically tag a novel data point with the most relevant subset of labels from an extremely large label set. Embedding based approaches make training and prediction tractable by assuming that the training label matrix is low-rank and hen…

2015-07-09abs ↗pdf ↗

In ranking problems, the goal is to learn a ranking function from labeled pairs of input points. In this paper, we consider the related comparison problem, where the label indicates which element of the pair is better, or if there is no significant difference. We cast the learning problem as a margin maximization, and …

2014-01-30abs ↗pdf ↗

Despite the breakthroughs achieved by deep learning models in conventional supervised learning scenarios, their dependence on sufficient labeled training data in each class prevents effective applications of these deep models in situations where labeled training instances for a subset of novel classes are very sparse -…

2018-04-19abs ↗pdf ↗

We consider the problem of rank loss minimization in the setting of multilabel classification, which is usually tackled by means of convex surrogate losses defined on pairs of labels. Very recently, this approach was put into question by a negative result showing that commonly used pairwise surrogate losses, such as ex…

2012-06-27abs ↗pdf ↗

Cross-modal hashing has been receiving increasing interests for its low storage cost and fast query speed in multi-modal data retrievals. However, most existing hashing methods are based on hand-crafted or raw level features of objects, which may not be optimally compatible with the coding process. Besides, these hashi…

2019-05-11abs ↗pdf ↗

DNN-based cross-modal retrieval has become a research hotspot, by which users can search results across various modalities like image and text. However, existing methods mainly focus on the pairwise correlation and reconstruction error of labeled data. They ignore the semantically similar and dissimilar constraints bet…

2017-03-21abs ↗pdf ↗

Paper proposes a cost-sensitive conformal training method with provably controllable learning bounds.

problem Uncertainty quantification and learning bounds in conformal prediction.
method Cost-sensitive conformal training algorithm that minimizes the expected size of prediction sets using rank weighting.
result Theoretical analysis shows tightness between weighted objective and expected size of conformal prediction sets.