Research
On-device research index

arXiv research

A locally-built, LLM-digested index of recent arXiv papers in quant finance, geometry/topology, and statistical ML — keyword search served straight from SQLite on this machine.

168,742 papers · 148 categories

Trend · papers per month

4081121161 · Jun 202019922001200920172026
48 results for individual fairness

The study analyzes the conflict between group fairness and individual fairness in machine learning.

problem The conflict between group fairness (optimal statistical parity) and individual fairness in machine learning.
method Established sufficient conditions for the compatibility between optimal statistical parity and individual fairness requirements.
result Identified regions along the Pareto frontier that satisfy individual fairness requirements.

This paper introduces individual fairness in clustering using ff-divergence.

problem Ensuring fair clustering by treating similar individuals similarly.
method Uses ff-divergence to measure statistical similarity and assigns individuals to probability distributions over cluster centers.
result Provides an algorithm with provable approximation guarantee for clustering with individual fairness constraints.

Investigates fairness in pipeline models where individuals may drop out.

problem Fairness in pipeline models where individuals may drop out and subsequent stages depend on remaining individuals.
method Rigorous framework for evaluating fairness guarantees, showing that naïve auditing is insufficient and dependence must exist between stages.
result Fairness in pipelines can be arbitrary, even with just two stages, and requires dependence between stages.

Two simple methods learn fair metrics from data to improve fairness in ML tasks.

problem Lack of widely accepted fair metrics for many ML tasks hinders individual fairness adoption.
method Presented two simple ways to learn fair metrics from various data types.
result Fair training with learned metrics improves fairness on three ML tasks.

Whereas previous post-processing approaches for increasing the fairness of predictions of biased classifiers address only group fairness, we propose a method for increasing both individual and group fairness. Our novel framework includes an individual bias detector used to prioritize data samples in a bias mitigation a…

2018-12-14abs ↗pdf ↗

Revises individual fairness by finding a fair metric for a model.

problem Difficulties in specifying a suitable fairness metric a priori.
method Introduces minimal metrics and applies randomized smoothing from adversarial robustness.
result Adapting minimal metrics to complex models yields interpretable fairness guarantees.

Post-processing corrects bias in ML systems without retraining.

problem Correcting bias in ML systems that are already in use.
method Proposes general post-processing algorithms for individual fairness based on graph Laplacian regularization.
result Empirically, post-processing algorithms correct individual biases in large-scale NLP models while preserving accuracy.

Algorithm samples fair rankings to ensure individual fairness while maintaining group fairness.

problem Fair ranking tasks with group fairness constraints and uncertainty in item utilities.
method Efficient algorithm that samples rankings from an individually-fair distribution ensuring group fairness.
result Expected utility of output ranking is at least α times optimal fair solution, where α depends on utilities and constraints.

Paper shows fairness and domain adaptation can work together.

problem Algorithmic bias and distributional shifts in ML models.
method Leveraging fairness and distribution shifts, the paper shows how domain adaptation methods can mitigate bias.
result Enforcing individual fairness can improve out-of-distribution accuracy under covariate shift.

There has been much discussion recently about how fairness should be measured or enforced in classification. Individual Fairness [Dwork, Hardt, Pitassi, Reingold, Zemel, 2012], which requires that similar individuals be treated similarly, is a highly appealing definition as it gives strong guarantees on treatment of in…

2019-06-01abs ↗pdf ↗

Introduces lookahead counterfactual fairness to account for downstream effects of ML predictions.

problem Downstream effects of ML predictions on individuals not considered by counterfactual fairness.
method Introduces lookahead counterfactual fairness (LCF), a new fairness notion that considers future status. Proposes an algorithm based on theoretical conditions.
result Proposes an algorithm to achieve lookahead counterfactual fairness and validates it on synthetic and real data.

Develops verifiers to check if machine learning models treat similar individuals equally.

problem Ensuring fairness in machine learning models by checking if similar individuals are treated differently.
method Constructs verifiers for proving individual fairness of machine learning models, considering relaxations of the problem.
result Developed verifiers for linear and kernelized polynomial/radial basis function classifiers.

Since many critical decisions impacting human lives are increasingly being made by algorithms, it is important to ensure that the treatment of individuals under such algorithms is demonstrably fair under reasonable notions of fairness. One compelling notion proposed in the literature is that of individual fairness (IF)…

2018-12-10abs ↗pdf ↗

The paper tackles individual fairness in ML models, developing statistical methods to detect bias.

problem Detecting and measuring violations of individual fairness in machine learning models.
method Formalizing the problem as adversarial attack, developing inference tools for the adversarial cost function.
result Statistical methods to assess and test hypotheses of model fairness with non-coverage error rate control.

We study notions of fairness in decision-making systems when individuals have diverse preferences over the possible outcomes of the decisions. Our starting point is the seminal work of Dwork et al. which introduced a notion of individual fairness (IF): given a task-specific similarity metric, every pair of individuals …

2019-04-03abs ↗pdf ↗

This paper improves fairness in recommendation systems by learning individual preferences across multiple dimensions.

problem Fairness in recommender systems, especially in areas with social impact.
method Opportunistic multi-aspect re-ranking approach that learns individual preferences and enhances provider fairness.
result Achieves a better trade-off between accuracy and fairness across multiple fairness dimensions.

New fairness notion helps identify fair auditors for evaluating decision-support systems.

problem Identifying fair auditors to evaluate decision-support systems for bias.
method Introducing a non-comparative fairness notion based on desired system properties.
result The proposed fairness notion provides guarantees in terms of comparative fairness.

Classifiers that achieve demographic balance by explicitly using protected attributes such as race or gender are often politically or culturally controversial due to their lack of individual fairness, i.e. individuals with similar qualifications will receive different outcomes. Individually and group fair decision crit…

2019-09-03abs ↗pdf ↗

The paper addresses fairness in online learning by extending auditing schemes and presenting efficient algorithms.

problem Ensuring fairness in online learning while maximizing predictive accuracy.
method Extending auditing schemes to handle multiple auditors and presenting oracle-efficient algorithms.
result Presented algorithms achieve upper bounds on regret and fairness violations, improving on existing bounds.

The paper tackles multi-level fairness in algorithmic systems, addressing bias at both individual and structural levels.

problem Algorithmic systems can unfairly impact marginalized groups, especially when considering only individual-level bias.
method Formalizes multi-level fairness using causal inference tools, addressing effects of sensitive attributes at multiple levels.
result Illustrates the importance of accounting for macro-level sensitive attributes in fairness assessments.

Proposes a method to create fair ITRs that balance value and fairness.

problem Fairness issues in ITRs that can lead to unfair advantages or disadvantages.
method Optimal transport theory to transform optimal ITRs into fair ITRs.
result Established a theoretical upper bound on value loss for improved trade-off ITRs.

The paper proposes a method to measure fairness through equality of effort using algorithmic recourse.

problem Measuring fairness through equality of effort in automated systems.
method Applying algorithmic recourse to quantify equality of effort, overcoming previous limitations.
result An algorithm for assessing equality of effort has been developed and validated.

New fairness criteria for algorithmic recourse actions that consider causal relationships.

problem Fairness of recourse actions in algorithmic classification.
method Proposes two new fairness criteria at group and individual levels, explicitly accounting for causal relationships.
result Fairness of recourse is complementary to fairness of prediction, and can be enforced by altering the classifier.

The paper explores fairness in machine learning by setting subgroup sample complexity bounds and advocating for human intervention.

problem Machine learning models often show different performance metrics for different subgroups, due to various factors.
method The paper presents lower bounds of subgroup sample complexity for metric-fair learning and proposes an approach using individual fairness definitions for cases where subgroup samples are insufficient.
result For a classifier to be fair, adequate subgroup population samples are necessary, and model dimensionality must align with subgroup population distributions.

The paper introduces a method to achieve fairness in machine learning models using graph models.

problem Theoretical properties and intuition behind fairness in machine learning models are poorly understood.
method Sheaf Diffusion framework to model fairness in a bias-free space.
result The proposed method achieves fair solutions and handles different fairness metrics.

Deep learning is increasingly being used in high-stake decision making applications that affect individual lives. However, deep learning models might exhibit algorithmic discrimination behaviors with respect to protected groups, potentially posing negative impacts on individuals and society. Therefore, fairness in deep…

2019-08-23abs ↗pdf ↗

We consider training machine learning models that are fair in the sense that their performance is invariant under certain sensitive perturbations to the inputs. For example, the performance of a resume screening system should be invariant under changes to the gender and/or ethnicity of the applicant. We formalize this …

2019-06-28abs ↗pdf ↗

A novel multi-objective optimization framework improves insurance pricing fairness.

problem Exacerbated trade-offs between competing fairness criteria in insurance pricing using machine learning.
method Proposes a novel multi-objective optimization framework using NSGA-II to jointly optimize accuracy and fairness criteria.
result Consistently achieves a balanced compromise between accuracy and fairness, outperforming single-model approaches.

The paper explores fairness in multi-component recommender systems.

problem How to ensure fairness in recommender systems composed of multiple models.
method Study of fairness ranking metrics, theoretical analysis, and empirical evaluation.
result Fairness in recommendation systems can be achieved by improving individual components.

Current methodologies in machine learning analyze the effects of various statistical parity notions of fairness primarily in light of their impacts on predictive accuracy and vendor utility loss. In this paper, we propose a new framework for interpreting the effects of fairness criteria by converting the constrained lo…

2018-07-03abs ↗pdf ↗