Research
On-device research index

arXiv research

A locally-built, LLM-digested index of recent arXiv papers in quant finance, geometry/topology, and statistical ML — keyword search served straight from SQLite on this machine.

168,742 papers · 148 categories

Trend · papers per month

0.3%0.5%0.8%0.4% · Aug 202519922001200920172026
48 results for fairness-aware

Fairness-aware classification is receiving increasing attention in the machine learning fields. Recently research proposes to formulate the fairness-aware classification as constrained optimization problems. However, several limitations exist in previous works due to the lack of a theoretical framework for guiding the …

2018-09-13abs ↗pdf ↗

Fairness-aware learning is increasingly important in data mining. Discrimination prevention aims to prevent discrimination in the training data before it is used to conduct predictive analysis. In this paper, we focus on fair data generation that ensures the generated data is discrimination free. Inspired by generative…

2018-05-28abs ↗pdf ↗

DQ4FairIM uses RL to maximize influence while ensuring fairness across all groups.

problem Fairness in influence maximization in social networks.
method Fairness-aware deep RL method using Structure2Vec network embedding.
result DQ4FairIM achieves higher fairness than fairness-agnostic and fairness-aware baselines.

The paper proves statistical consistency and fairness guarantees for a plug-in algorithm.

problem Establishing statistical guarantees for fairness-aware binary classification.
method Proves statistical consistency and derives finite sample guarantees for the plug-in algorithm.
result The plug-in algorithm is statistically consistent and guarantees fairness and differential privacy.

Automated data-driven decision-making systems are ubiquitous across a wide spread of online as well as offline services. These systems, depend on sophisticated learning algorithms and available data, to optimize the service function for decision support assistance. However, there is a growing concern about the accounta…

2019-07-16abs ↗pdf ↗

FAE framework tackles fairness in machine learning by balancing data and adjusting decision boundaries.

problem Discrimination in automated decision-making based on machine learning algorithms.
method Combines pre- and post-processing fairness interventions to address group imbalance, class imbalance, and class overlap.
result Improves fairness in machine learning models by balancing data and adjusting decision boundaries.

The widespread use of ML-based decision making in domains with high societal impact such as recidivism, job hiring and loan credit has raised a lot of concerns regarding potential discrimination. In particular, in certain cases it has been observed that ML algorithms can provide different decisions based on sensitive a…

2019-09-17abs ↗pdf ↗

The paper provides CI for test unfairness of group-fairness-aware classifiers trained with online SGD.

problem Ensuring fairness in machine learning models trained with stochastic gradient descent.
method Developed an online multiplier bootstrap method to estimate CI for test unfairness of DI and DM-aware linear classifiers.
result Asymptotic Central Limit Theorem holds for CI estimation of DI and DM-aware models.

Work proposes CLAIRE to achieve counterfactual fairness from observational data without causal models.

problem Achieving counterfactual fairness from observational data without prior causal models.
method Proposes CLAIRE, a representation learning framework based on counterfactual data augmentation and an invariant penalty.
result CLAIRE effectively mitigates biases from the sensitive attribute and improves counterfactual fairness and prediction performance.

Recommender systems are used in variety of domains affecting people's lives. This has raised concerns about possible biases and discrimination that such systems might exacerbate. There are two primary kinds of biases inherent in recommender systems: observation bias and bias stemming from imbalanced data. Observation b…

2018-09-13abs ↗pdf ↗

A novel multi-objective optimization framework improves insurance pricing fairness.

problem Exacerbated trade-offs between competing fairness criteria in insurance pricing using machine learning.
method Proposes a novel multi-objective optimization framework using NSGA-II to jointly optimize accuracy and fairness criteria.
result Consistently achieves a balanced compromise between accuracy and fairness, outperforming single-model approaches.

Introduces privilege scores to measure and interpret protected attribute-related privilege in machine learning models.

problem Lack of explicit formulation of non-neutrality in fairness-aware machine learning methods.
method Privilege scores (PS) and privilege score contributions (PSCs) to measure and interpret protected attribute-related privilege.
result Demonstrates the broad applicability of PS and PSCs in gender and racial privilege in mortgage and college admissions applications.

New study shows how adversaries can bias fair machine learning models even with corrupted data.

problem Fairness concerns in machine learning models under data corruption.
method Study of fairness-aware learning algorithms under worst-case data manipulations.
result Natural learning algorithms optimizing for both accuracy and fairness are order-optimal in terms of corruption ratio and protected groups frequencies.

FairUDT uses uplift decision trees to detect and mitigate discrimination in training data.

problem Bias in machine learning classifiers due to historical discrimination or underrepresentation of minority groups.
method Integrates uplift modeling with decision trees and introduces a modified leaf relabeling approach for fairness.
result Achieves an acceptable accuracy-discrimination tradeoff while maintaining interpretability.

This paper studies fairness and privacy in federated learning, proposing algorithms to balance both.

problem Joint impact of differential privacy and fairness in federated classification.
method Proposes FDP-Fair and CDP-Fair algorithms for demographic disparity constrained classification under federated differential privacy.
result Established theoretical guarantees on privacy, fairness, and excess risk control.

FIFA improves fairness in imbalanced datasets by encouraging both classification and fairness generalization.

problem Imbalanced datasets lead to poor fairness generalization in classifiers.
method FIFA: Imbalance-Fairness-Aware approach that encourages both classification and fairness generalization.
result FIFA improves fairness generalization on real-world datasets.

Propensity score matching improves fairness in machine learning models.

problem Bias in training data affects fairness metrics in machine learning models.
method Propensity score matching to evaluate and mitigate bias in test data.
result FairMatch significantly reduces bias in test data without sacrificing predictive performance.

FanG-HPO optimizes machine learning models for fairness and low energy consumption.

problem Bias in machine learning models and high energy consumption in hyperparameter optimization.
method Combines multi-objective and multiple information source Bayesian optimization.
result FanG-HPO identifies fair and energy-efficient machine learning models.

FAML addresses biased evidence learning in multi-view learning, improving fairness and prediction reliability.

problem Biased evidence learning in multi-view learning, leading to unreliable uncertainty estimation.
method FAML introduces an adaptive prior and fairness constraint to balance evidence allocation across views.
result FAML enhances fairness and improves prediction reliability compared to state-of-the-art methods.

The paper evaluates the importance of monotonicity in AI fairness across various fields.

problem Ensuring fairness in AI applications across criminology, education, health care, and finance.
method Theoretical reasoning, simulation, and extensive empirical analysis of monotonic neural additive models (MNAMs).
result Monotonicity is essential for fairness in AI ethics and society, especially in criminology, education, health care, and finance.

Proposes a method to enforce fairness in machine learning models without sensitive data.

problem Bias in machine learning models from historical data.
method Infers sensitive attributes from auxiliary features and integrates fairness constraints into model training.
result Mitigates bias while preserving predictive accuracy.

Study shows how online personalization can lead to unfair models due to biased user responses.

problem Fairness issues in online personalization systems due to biased user responses.
method Formulated a regularization-based approach to mitigate biases in machine learning models.
result Demonstrated that online personalization can cause models to learn unfair behavior from biased user responses.

Consider a binary decision making process where a single machine learning classifier replaces a multitude of humans. We raise questions about the resulting loss of diversity in the decision making process. We study the potential benefits of using random classifier ensembles instead of a single classifier in the context…

2017-06-30abs ↗pdf ↗

The paper tackles fairness in estimating graphical models, especially for protected attributes.

problem Fairness issues in estimating graphical models, particularly for sensitive characteristics.
method Integrates pairwise graph disparity error and a tailored loss function into a multi-objective optimization problem.
result Successfully mitigates bias in graphical model estimation without compromising model performance.

It has been shown that dimension reduction methods such as PCA may be inherently prone to unfairness and treat data from different sensitive groups such as race, color, sex, etc., unfairly. In pursuit of fairness-enhancing dimensionality reduction, using the notion of Pareto optimality, we propose an adaptive first-ord…

2019-11-12abs ↗pdf ↗

FairNN learns fair representations and decisions by optimizing a multi-objective loss function.

problem Fairness in machine learning models for decision-making.
method Joint feature representation and classification with multi-objective loss function.
result Joint approach outperforms separate treatment of fairness in representation learning or supervised learning.

Ensuring that classifiers are non-discriminatory or fair with respect to a sensitive feature (e.g., race or gender) is a topical problem. Progress in this task requires fixing a definition of fairness, and there have been several proposals in this regard over the past few years. Several of these, however, assume either…

2019-01-24abs ↗pdf ↗

The wide spread usage of automated data-driven decision support systems has raised a lot of concerns regarding accountability and fairness of the employed models in the absence of human supervision. Existing fairness-aware approaches tackle fairness as a batch learning problem and aim at learning a fair model which can…

2019-07-16abs ↗pdf ↗

We study an interesting variant of the stochastic multi-armed bandit problem, called the Fair-SMAB problem, where each arm is required to be pulled for at least a given fraction of the total available rounds. We investigate the interplay between learning and fairness in terms of a pre-specified vector denoting the frac…

2019-05-27abs ↗pdf ↗

We study an interesting variant of the stochastic multi-armed bandit problem, called the Fair-SMAB problem, where each arm is required to be pulled for at least a given fraction of the total available rounds. We investigate the interplay between learning and fairness in terms of a pre-specified vector denoting the frac…

2019-07-23abs ↗pdf ↗

The past few years have seen a dramatic rise of academic and societal interest in fair machine learning. While plenty of fair algorithms have been proposed recently to tackle this challenge for discrete variables, only a few ideas exist for continuous ones. The objective in this paper is to ensure some independence lev…

2019-11-12abs ↗pdf ↗