G-SHAP generates multiple types of explanations for machine learning models.
problem Understanding model predictions and their differences across groups.
method Generalization of SHAP method to produce additional types of explanations.
result G-SHAP produces explanations for classification, intergroup differences, and model failure.
GRANITE unifies feature-based explanation methods to reduce disagreement.
problem Disagreement among feature-based explanation methods.
method GRANITE partitions feature space into regions minimizing interaction and distribution influences.
result Unified and consistent feature explanations.
The paper tackles one-for-many counterfactual explanations using column generation.
problem Minimizing the number of explanations needed for a group of instances with sparsity constraints.
method Developed a novel column generation framework to efficiently search for explanations for any black-box classifier.
result The column generation framework outperforms existing methods in scalability, computational performance, and solution quality.
LLMs' explanations are often insufficient and vary with input distribution.
problem Evaluating the sufficiency of LLM explanations without predefined biases.
method Generalizing sufficiency to arbitrary explanations, using LLM's input beliefs, and introducing SCSuff metric.
result Explanation sufficiency can vary with input distribution and is weakly correlated with model size, accuracy, or output entropy.
Many methods to explain black-box models, whether local or global, are additive. In this paper, we study global additive explanations for non-additive models, focusing on four explanation methods: partial dependence, Shapley explanations adapted to a global setting, distilled additive explanations, and gradient-based e…
New definition reveals encoding explanations that retain predictive power.
problem Challenges in evaluating and identifying encoding explanations.
method Developed a definition of encoding based on conditional dependence.
result Existing evaluation scores do not rank non-encoding explanations correctly, but STRIPE-X does.
We regard explanations as a blending of the input sample and the model's output and offer a few definitions that capture various desired properties of the function that generates these explanations. We study the links between these properties and between explanation-generating functions and intermediate representations…
Study finds visual explanations do not significantly improve human accuracy or trust in model predictions.
problem Measuring the impact of visual explanations on human accuracy and trust in model predictions.
method Randomized controlled trial with image-based age prediction task, varying levels of explanation quality.
result Visual explanations do not significantly alter human accuracy or trust in the model.
New method for explaining dialogue response generation models.
problem Interpreting sequence generation models, especially dialogue response generation.
method Local Explanation of Response Generation (LERG) method.
result LERG improves dialogue response generation explanations compared to existing methods.
AXE evaluates explanations to avoid misleading Rashomon set model selection.
problem Evaluating explanations for Rashomon set models to avoid false selection.
method Proposed AXE method to evaluate explanation quality.
result AXE detects adversarial fairwashing with 100% success rate.
This research investigates reliable local explanations for machine listening models.
problem Generating reliable local explanations for machine listening models.
method Investigates the sensitivity of SoundLIME explanations to input perturbations and proposes a novel method for identifying suitable content types.
result SoundLIME explanations are sensitive to the content in occluded input regions, and the average magnitude of input mel-spectrogram bins is the most suitable content type for temporal explanations.
Differentially private algorithms protect model explanations from leaking training data.
problem Model explanations can leak training data, compromising privacy.
method Adaptive differentially private gradient descent algorithm to produce accurate, private explanations.
result Privacy amplification and reduction of overall privacy loss on explanation data.
RAW-Explainer generates interpretable subgraph explanations for link predictions in knowledge graphs.
problem Interpreting GNN predictions for link prediction in heterogeneous settings is challenging.
method RAW-Explainer uses random walk objective and neural network to generate connected, concise subgraph explanations.
result RAW-Explainer strikes a balance between explanation quality and computational efficiency.
With the advent of GDPR, the domain of explainable AI and model interpretability has gained added impetus. Methods to extract and communicate visibility into decision-making models have become legal requirement. Two specific types of explanations, contrastive and counterfactual have been identified as suitable for huma…
Develops causal explanations for black-box classifiers.
problem Creating understandable explanations for complex models.
method Generative model with information-theoretic measures of causal influence.
result Learned latent factors influence classifier outputs.
Artificial intelligence (AI) comes with great opportunities but can also pose significant risks. Automatically generated explanations for decisions can increase transparency and foster trust, especially for systems based on automated predictions by AI models. However, given, e.g., economic incentives to create dishones…
Paper bridges generative models and explainability.
problem Lack of connection between generative models and explainability.
method Proposes a probabilistic framework for example-based explanations.
result Formally defines example-based explanations for deep generative models.
Novel framework explains machine learning models using ontology-based sampling.
problem Generating precise and insightful explanations for machine learning models.
method Ontology-based sampling technique and learnable anchor algorithm.
result Our approach generates more precise and insightful explanations.
Proposes a method for multilevel explanations of black-box models.
problem Need for explanations at intermediate or group levels, especially for GDPR compliance.
method Meta-method that builds a multilevel explanation tree using local explainability methods.
result Effective multilevel explanations for groups of data points, including novel test points.
This research improves interpretability in sequential explanations using mental models.
problem Improving interpretability in sequential explanations between two parties.
method A reinforcement learning framework that selects explanations based on the explainee's mental model.
result Mental model-based policies increase interpretability over random selection in multiple sequential explanations.
δ-CLUE generates diverse explanations for model uncertainty.
problem Lack of constraints in generating explanations for uncertainty estimates.
method Augmenting CLUE approach to provide a set of plausible explanations.
result Returns a set of diverse inputs that yield confident predictions.
R package for counterfactual explanation methods.
problem Lack of unified interfaces for counterfactual explanation methods.
method Developed a modular R6-based interface for three existing counterfactual methods and proposed extensions.
result Comparison of implemented methods' quality and runtime behavior.
Recent work in model-agnostic explanations of black-box machine learning has demonstrated that interpretability of complex models does not have to come at the cost of accuracy or model flexibility. However, it is not clear what kind of explanations, such as linear models, decision trees, and rule lists, are the appropr…
Improves local model explanations using GANs and Linear Model Trees.
problem Need for accurate and intuitive explanations of complex machine learning models.
method Generative Adversarial Network (GAN) for synthetic data generation and Linear Model Trees for surrogate model training.
result Significantly improved local model explanations with contextual information.
Optimizes explanations for better listener understanding.
problem Insufficient consideration of listener preferences in concept-based explanations.
method Iterative training procedure based on direct preference optimization.
result Pragmatic explanations improve both model accuracy and user understanding.
Local Interpretable Model-Agnostic Explanations (LIME) is a popular technique used to increase the interpretability and explainability of black box Machine Learning (ML) algorithms. LIME typically generates an explanation for a single prediction by any ML model by learning a simpler interpretable model (e.g. linear cla…
The paper introduces a method to learn models with built-in explanations.
problem Lack of interpretability in deep learning models.
method Formalizes learning with explanation constraints and provides a learning theoretic framework.
result Models that satisfy these constraints have reduced Rademacher complexities, improving their performance.
DECE visualizes machine learning decisions with counterfactual explanations.
problem Making machine learning models transparent and explainable.
method Interactive visualization system supporting counterfactual explanations at instance- and subgroup-levels.
result DECE enables users to explore and understand machine learning model decisions.
OrphicX generates causal explanations for GNNs by isolating latent causal factors.
problem Generating interpretable causal explanations for complex graph neural networks.
method Develops a generative model and objective function to isolate latent causal factors, maximizing information flow.
result OrphicX effectively identifies causal semantics, significantly outperforming alternatives.
Bayesian framework improves reliability and consistency of model explanations.
problem Inconsistent and unreliable explanations from state-of-the-art methods.
method Developed a novel Bayesian framework for generating local explanations with associated uncertainty.
result Generated explanations are consistent, stable, and provide credible intervals for feature importances.
Language helps RL agents learn complex relational and causal structures.
problem Learning relational and causal structure in complex environments.
method Training RL agents to predict language descriptions and explanations.
result Language aids agents in learning challenging relational and causal tasks.
Evaluates explanations of LTR models using decision paths and compares their accuracy.
problem Challenges in evaluating local explanations of LTR models due to lack of ground truth feature importance scores.
method Focuses on tree-based LTR models, extracts ground truth feature importance scores using decision paths, and compares them with explanation techniques.
result Explanation accuracy varies depending on the model and data point.
Study shows explanation disparities in machine learning models are influenced by data and model properties.
problem Disparities in post-hoc machine learning explanation methods across race and gender.
method Simulations and experiments on a real-world dataset to assess challenges to explanation disparities.
result Increased covariate shift, concept shift, and omission of covariates increase explanation disparities, especially for neural network models.
COMRECGC finds common recourse for global counterfactual explanations in GNNs.
problem Finding common recourse for global counterfactual explanations in GNNs.
method Formalized the common recourse explanation problem and designed COMRECGC algorithm.
result COMRECGC outperforms strong baselines on four real-world graph datasets.
Explains agent behavior through intended outcomes in reinforcement learning.
problem Proving impossibility of general post-hoc explanations in reinforcement learning.
method Derives local explanations based on intention for Q-function approximations, proving consistency with learned Q-values.
result Demonstrates the necessity of collecting information during training for accurate explanations.
BRACE generates efficient counterfactual explanations by integrating causal reasoning.
problem Challenges in traditional counterfactual explanations, especially neglecting causal relationships.
method Backtracking counterfactuals with causal reasoning.
result Our method provides deeper insights into model outputs and is computationally efficient.
Recently, a method [7] was proposed to generate contrastive explanations for differentiable models such as deep neural networks, where one has complete access to the model. In this work, we propose a method, Model Agnostic Contrastive Explanations Method (MACEM), to generate contrastive explanations for \emph{any} clas…
Post-hoc interpretability approaches have been proven to be powerful tools to generate explanations for the predictions made by a trained black-box model. However, they create the risk of having explanations that are a result of some artifacts learned by the model instead of actual knowledge from the data. This paper f…
Post-hoc explanations of machine learning models are crucial for people to understand and act on algorithmic predictions. An intriguing class of explanations is through counterfactuals, hypothetical examples that show people how to obtain a different prediction. We posit that effective counterfactual explanations shoul…
Explearn learns to explain predictions using Gaussian Processes.
problem Learning to explain predictions effectively.
method Gaussian Processes-based contextual bandits.
result Guaranteed convergence with high probability.
System allows users to critique explanations of recommendations.
problem Improving trust and perceived quality in recommendation systems.
method Personalized explanations generated from review texts, with a novel critiquing method.
result Users prefer explanations with critiques over those without.
The paper connects machine learning interpretability with learning theory.
problem Performance and explanation generalization in local machine learning models.
method Theoretical analysis and empirical validation of local approximation explanations.
result Theoretical bounds on test-time accuracy and explanation generalization.
This study analyzes counterfactual explanations for student success models.
problem Improving trust in machine learning models for student success prediction.
method Comparison of counterfactual generation methods (WhatIf, Multi-Objective, Nearest Instance) for student success prediction models.
result WhatIf Counterfactual Explanations are more effective for student success prediction models.
WISCA generates consensus explanations from conflicting model-agnostic interpretability methods.
problem Conflicting explanations from diverse interpretability algorithms.
method WISCA integrates class probability and normalized attributions to generate consistent explanations.
result WISCA consistently aligns with the most reliable individual method, improving explanation reliability.
ARFs generate plausible counterfactuals for models, improving model understanding.
problem Creating realistic counterfactuals for model analysis.
method Adversarial Random Forests (ARFs) for generating plausible counterfactuals.
result ARFs efficiently generate plausible counterfactuals in a model-agnostic way.
We introduce a new method to explain Gaussian processes using Shapley values.
problem Explaining the uncertainty in Gaussian process models.
method Extending Shapley values to stochastic cooperative games for Gaussian processes.
result Our method generates explanations that are random variables and satisfy favorable axioms.
System detects financial misinformation and generates clear explanations.
problem Identifying and explaining fraudulent financial content.
method Combined large language models, pre-processing, and sequential learning.
result Achieved F1-score of 0.8283 for classification and ROUGE-1 of 0.7253 for explanations.
New research challenges the idea that counterfactual explanations should be sparse.
problem Predictive multiplicity leads to multiple models giving almost equal solutions.
method Derive a general upper bound for counterfactual costs under multiplicity and compare sparse vs. data support approaches.
result Data support methods are more robust to multiplicity but have higher counterfactual costs.