AXE evaluates explanations to avoid misleading Rashomon set model selection.
problem Evaluating explanations for Rashomon set models to avoid false selection.
method Proposed AXE method to evaluate explanation quality.
result AXE detects adversarial fairwashing with 100% success rate.
The paper proposes criteria and methods for evaluating and aggregating feature-based model explanations.
problem Lack of quantitative evaluation criteria for feature-based model explanations.
method Developed quantitative evaluation criteria (low sensitivity, high faithfulness, low complexity), devised a framework for aggregation, and derived a new aggregate Shapley value explanation function.
result A new aggregate Shapley value explanation function that minimizes sensitivity.
Paper introduces new evaluation criteria for feature-based model explanations.
problem Establishing reliable feature importance explanations for models.
method Robustness analysis using smaller adversarial perturbations.
result New explanations that are necessary and sufficient for predictions.
New framework evaluates model explanations based on decision task improvement.
problem Evaluation of model explanations often misses practical value.
method Decision-theoretic framework quantifying three key values.
result Provides benchmarks and interprets human-AI decision support.
This paper proposes a set of criteria to evaluate the objectiveness of explanation methods of neural networks, which is crucial for the development of explainable AI, but it also presents significant challenges. The core challenge is that people usually cannot obtain ground-truth explanations of the neural network. To …
Defines explanations for classifier outcomes using causal concepts.
problem Understanding classifier outcomes in a causal context.
method Proposes a new definition of explanation based on causality, compares it with existing notions, and evaluates it experimentally.
result Experimental evaluation shows the new definition's effectiveness on financial datasets.
GRETEL unifies GCE evaluation across various settings.
problem Lack of standardized evaluation for Graph Counterfactual Explanations.
method Unified framework for testing GCE methods in diverse settings.
result GRETEL promotes reproducible evaluations of GCE techniques.
Evaluates explanations of LTR models using decision paths and compares their accuracy.
problem Challenges in evaluating local explanations of LTR models due to lack of ground truth feature importance scores.
method Focuses on tree-based LTR models, extracts ground truth feature importance scores using decision paths, and compares them with explanation techniques.
result Explanation accuracy varies depending on the model and data point.
Evaluates local explanations using white-box models and log odds ratios.
problem Costly and subjective evaluation of local explanations.
method Benchmarking explanation techniques using log odds ratios.
result Explanation techniques' performance depends on model, dataset, data point, and normalization.
Interpretable Machine Learning (IML) has become increasingly important in many real-world applications, such as autonomous cars and medical diagnosis, where explanations are significantly preferred to help people better understand how machine learning systems work and further enhance their trust towards systems. Howeve…
Study evaluates relevance metrics for similarity-based model explanations.
problem Providing understandable explanations for complex model predictions.
method Evaluated three relevance metrics using three tests.
result Cosine similarity of gradients performs best for explanations.
The study evaluates how well local explanations align with model predictions.
problem Capturing the faithfulness of local explanations to model predictions.
method Introducing consistency and sufficiency as properties, and developing quantitative measures and estimators.
result Quantitative measures of consistency and sufficiency depend on test-time data distribution.
New method to evaluate visual explanations from neural networks.
problem Lack of consensus on measuring effectiveness of visual explanations.
method Proposed a new procedure for evaluating explanations using a range of sources.
result Demonstrated the benefit of combining different sources and the impact of bias parameters.
ALMANACS benchmarks explainability methods on simulatability.
problem Evaluating the effectiveness of explainability methods for language models.
method ALMANACS is a simulatability benchmark that evaluates explainability methods on twelve safety-relevant topics.
result No explainability method outperforms the explanation-free control across all topics.
New method evaluates visual explanations of deep models using adversarial perturbations.
problem Lack of objective evaluation of visual explanations of deep models.
method Proposes an adversarial perturbation approach to evaluate visual explanations of deep models.
result Demonstrates the effectiveness of the proposed approach through comparisons with existing methods.
New definition reveals encoding explanations that retain predictive power.
problem Challenges in evaluating and identifying encoding explanations.
method Developed a definition of encoding based on conditional dependence.
result Existing evaluation scores do not rank non-encoding explanations correctly, but STRIPE-X does.
Transparency, user trust, and human comprehension are popular ethical motivations for interpretable machine learning. In support of these goals, researchers evaluate model explanation performance using humans and real world applications. This alone presents a challenge in many areas of artificial intelligence. In this …
Two modified tests improve the reliability of evaluating explanation methods.
problem Methodological concerns in evaluating explanation methods for saliency maps.
method Proposed modifications to the Model Parameter Randomisation Test (MPRT): Smooth MPRT and Efficient MPRT.
result Enhanced metric reliability, facilitating more trustworthy deployment of explanation methods.
Study evaluates local explanation methods for time series forecasting.
problem Lack of local interpretability methods for multivariate time series forecasting.
method Proposed two novel evaluation metrics: Area Over the Perturbation Curve for Regression and Ablation Percentage Threshold.
result Comprehensive comparison of local explanation models on two datasets.
Study evaluates counterfactual explanations using Pearl's method.
problem Bias in counterfactual explanations generated from machine learning models.
method Evaluates counterfactual explanations using Judea Pearl's counterfactual method.
result Thirty percent of counterfactual explanations conflicted with Pearl's method.
Study investigates how AI can create and detect deceptive explanations, finding they can fool humans but ML can detect them.
problem The risk of deceptive AI explanations increasing trust issues and economic risks.
method Investigates creation and detection of deceptive explanations using AI models and machine learning methods.
result Deceptive explanations can fool humans, but ML can detect them with high accuracy.
ACE improves counterfactual explanations with fewer model queries.
problem Inefficient sampling for counterfactual explanations in machine learning models.
method Adaptive sampling combining Bayesian estimation and stochastic optimization.
result ACE achieves superior evaluation efficiency compared to state-of-the-art methods.
ManifoldShap improves model explanations by restricting evaluations to the data manifold.
problem Inaccurate and misleading model explanations due to reliance on out-of-distribution data.
method Restricts model evaluations to the data manifold to avoid off-manifold perturbations.
result ManifoldShap provides more accurate and intuitive explanations than existing methods.
LLMs' explanations are often insufficient and vary with input distribution.
problem Evaluating the sufficiency of LLM explanations without predefined biases.
method Generalizing sufficiency to arbitrary explanations, using LLM's input beliefs, and introducing SCSuff metric.
result Explanation sufficiency can vary with input distribution and is weakly correlated with model size, accuracy, or output entropy.
Despite a growing literature on explaining neural networks, no consensus has been reached on how to explain a neural network decision or how to evaluate an explanation. Our contributions in this paper are twofold. First, we investigate schemes to combine explanation methods and reduce model uncertainty to obtain a sing…
Many methods to explain black-box models, whether local or global, are additive. In this paper, we study global additive explanations for non-additive models, focusing on four explanation methods: partial dependence, Shapley explanations adapted to a global setting, distilled additive explanations, and gradient-based e…
RAW-Explainer generates interpretable subgraph explanations for link predictions in knowledge graphs.
problem Interpreting GNN predictions for link prediction in heterogeneous settings is challenging.
method RAW-Explainer uses random walk objective and neural network to generate connected, concise subgraph explanations.
result RAW-Explainer strikes a balance between explanation quality and computational efficiency.
Post-hoc explanations of machine learning models are crucial for people to understand and act on algorithmic predictions. An intriguing class of explanations is through counterfactuals, hypothetical examples that show people how to obtain a different prediction. We posit that effective counterfactual explanations shoul…
In many modern image-classification applications, understanding the cause of model's prediction can be as critical as the prediction's accuracy itself. Various feature-based local explanations generation methods have been designed to give us more insights on the decision of complex classifiers. Nevertheless, there is n…
Differentially private algorithms protect model explanations from leaking training data.
problem Model explanations can leak training data, compromising privacy.
method Adaptive differentially private gradient descent algorithm to produce accurate, private explanations.
result Privacy amplification and reduction of overall privacy loss on explanation data.
We consider objective evaluation measures of saliency explanations for complex black-box machine learning models. We propose simple robust variants of two notions that have been considered in recent literature: (in)fidelity, and sensitivity. We analyze optimal explanations with respect to both these measures, and while…
Deep learning is increasingly used as a building block of security systems. Unfortunately, neural networks are hard to interpret and typically opaque to the practitioner. The machine learning community has started to address this problem by developing methods for explaining the predictions of neural networks. While sev…
In many applications, an anomaly detection system presents the most anomalous data instance to a human analyst, who then must determine whether the instance is truly of interest (e.g. a threat in a security setting). Unfortunately, most anomaly detectors provide no explanation about why an instance was considered anoma…
We propose a fast, model agnostic method for finding interpretable counterfactual explanations of classifier predictions by using class prototypes. We show that class prototypes, obtained using either an encoder or through class specific k-d trees, significantly speed up the the search for counterfactual instances and …
Privacy and transparency are two key foundations of trustworthy machine learning. Model explanations offer insights into a model's decisions on input data, whereas privacy is primarily concerned with protecting information about the training data. We analyze connections between model explanations and the leakage of sen…
New feature mapping approach improves recommendation accuracy and explainability.
problem Balancing recommendation accuracy and explainability using metadata.
method Maps uninterpretable features to interpretable aspect features, minimizing both prediction and interpretation losses.
result Strong performance in recommendation and explainability, eliminating metadata need.
New saliency evaluations focus on completeness and soundness, improving explanations.
problem Current saliency evaluations focus on completeness but ignore soundness.
method Introduces new intrinsic evaluation metrics based on completeness and soundness.
result Simple saliency method matches or outperforms prior methods in new evaluations.
Study finds visual explanations do not significantly improve human accuracy or trust in model predictions.
problem Measuring the impact of visual explanations on human accuracy and trust in model predictions.
method Randomized controlled trial with image-based age prediction task, varying levels of explanation quality.
result Visual explanations do not significantly alter human accuracy or trust in the model.
A new method explains RNNs by decision lists over skipgrams, improving explanation fidelity and interpretability.
problem Lack of understanding how input segments combine to form patterns in neural network outputs.
method Proposes a pipeline to explain RNNs using decision lists over skipgrams, creating synthetic and real-world datasets for evaluation.
result Persistently achieves high explanation fidelity and interpretable rules.
Survey of counterfactual explanations for time series classification.
problem Generating plausible and actionable counterfactuals for time series data.
method Review of various counterfactual generation methods for time series classification.
result Highlight unique challenges and strengths of existing methods.
Paper proposes Coalitional BAE to improve explainability of unsupervised deep learning models.
problem Improving explainability of Autoencoder's predictions.
method Introduces Coalitional BAE, inspired by agent-based system theory, to reduce correlation in explanations.
result Improved quality of explanations using Coalitional BAE on publicly available datasets.
Using machine learning in high-stakes applications often requires predictions to be accompanied by explanations comprehensible to the domain user, who has ultimate responsibility for decisions and outcomes. Recently, a new framework for providing explanations, called TED, has been proposed to provide meaningful explana…
We study the problem of explaining a rich class of behavioral properties of deep neural networks. Distinctively, our influence-directed explanations approach this problem by peering inside the network to identify neurons with high influence on a quantity and distribution of interest, using an axiomatically-justified in…
In the past years, many new explanation methods have been proposed to achieve interpretability of machine learning predictions. However, the utility of these methods in practical applications has not been researched extensively. In this paper we present the results of a human-grounded evaluation of SHAP, an explanation…
Attack reveals model details from counterfactual explanations.
problem Extracting model details from counterfactual explanations.
method Adversary uses counterfactual explanations to build high-fidelity model.
result High-fidelity and high-accuracy model extraction possible.
GLOBE-CE offers efficient global counterfactual explanations.
problem Lack of reliable and scalable global counterfactual explanations.
method Translation-based approach for global counterfactual explanations.
result GLOBE-CE performs significantly better than current methods across multiple metrics.
XAI methods fail to explain ML models reliably.
problem Current XAI methods fail to provide reliable explanations for ML models.
method Formally define problems and design methods accordingly.
result Diverse notions of explanation correctness and metrics needed.
CTE improves explanation estimation with less data and faster computation.
problem Inefficient and inaccurate explanation estimation in machine learning models.
method Distribution compression through kernel thinning to reduce sample size.
result CTE significantly improves accuracy and stability of explanation estimation.