Research
On-device research index

arXiv research

A locally-built, LLM-digested index of recent arXiv papers in quant finance, geometry/topology, and statistical ML — keyword search served straight from SQLite on this machine.

168,695 papers · 148 categories

Trend · papers per month

4284126168 · Jun 202019922001200920172026
48 results for explanation capabilities

Study finds visual explanations do not significantly improve human accuracy or trust in model predictions.

problem Measuring the impact of visual explanations on human accuracy and trust in model predictions.
method Randomized controlled trial with image-based age prediction task, varying levels of explanation quality.
result Visual explanations do not significantly alter human accuracy or trust in the model.

New method evaluates visual explanations of deep models using adversarial perturbations.

problem Lack of objective evaluation of visual explanations of deep models.
method Proposes an adversarial perturbation approach to evaluate visual explanations of deep models.
result Demonstrates the effectiveness of the proposed approach through comparisons with existing methods.

System detects financial misinformation and generates clear explanations.

problem Identifying and explaining fraudulent financial content.
method Combined large language models, pre-processing, and sequential learning.
result Achieved F1-score of 0.8283 for classification and ROUGE-1 of 0.7253 for explanations.

Measures faithfulness of LLM explanations to reveal hidden biases and misleading claims.

problem LLM explanations can misrepresent the model's reasoning process, leading to over-trust and misuse.
method Defines faithfulness in terms of concept influence and uses counterfactuals and Bayesian models to estimate it.
result Can quantify and discover interpretable patterns of unfaithfulness in LLM explanations.

Study proposes explainable analytics for manufacturing process planning.

problem Improving data-driven decision-making in manufacturing.
method Combines process mining, machine learning, and XAI. Uses deep learning for prediction and Shapley values/ICE plots for explanations.
result Enhanced decision-making capabilities through local post-hoc explanations.

We study the problem of explaining a rich class of behavioral properties of deep neural networks. Distinctively, our influence-directed explanations approach this problem by peering inside the network to identify neurons with high influence on a quantity and distribution of interest, using an axiomatically-justified in…

2018-02-11abs ↗pdf ↗

SurvSHAP(t) explains time-dependent survival predictions from machine learning models.

problem Interpreting complex survival models for time-dependent effects.
method SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) adapted for time-dependent survival predictions.
result SurvSHAP(t) detects time-dependent effects and improves variable importance detection.

SEP framework teaches LLMs to generate explainable stock predictions.

problem Challenging task of generating human-readable explanations for stock predictions.
method Self-reflective agent and Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) for autonomous learning.
result Fine-tuned LLM outperforms traditional methods in prediction accuracy and Matthews correlation coefficient.

A new framework for robot block-stacking tasks using causal probabilistic models.

problem Robots fail outside controlled environments due to uncertainty and lack of explicit design for all scenarios.
method Causal probabilistic framework combining causal models and probabilistic representations of noise.
result Robots can perceive, reason about, and explain their environment for block-stacking tasks.

From self-driving vehicles and back-flipping robots to virtual assistants who book our next appointment at the hair salon or at that restaurant for dinner - machine learning systems are becoming increasingly ubiquitous. The main reason for this is that these methods boast remarkable predictive capabilities. However, mo…

2018-08-15abs ↗pdf ↗

Study proposes a novel local explanation method for deep learning classifiers in process mining.

problem Lack of interpretability in deep learning models for process mining.
method Defines local regions using latent space representations and visualizes explanations.
result Deep learning classifier achieves high performance and local explanations increase user trust.

Paper introduces CoD for few-shot task-aware knowledge distillation using counterfactual explanations.

problem Lack of data for task-aware distillation in resource-constrained scenarios.
method Counterfactual-explanation-infused Distillation CoD for few-shot task-aware knowledge distillation.
result CoD achieves superior performance with significantly fewer samples than baseline methods.

SMILE improves explainability of machine learning models.

problem Difficulty in understanding and trusting the conclusions of black-box machine learning models.
method Statistical Model-agnostic Interpretability with Local Explanations (SMILE).
result SMILE makes machine learning models more interpretable.

XDeep is an open-source Python package developed to interpret deep models for both practitioners and researchers. Overall, XDeep takes a trained deep neural network (DNN) as the input, and generates relevant interpretations as the output with the post-hoc manner. From the functionality perspective, XDeep integrates a w…

2019-11-04abs ↗pdf ↗

Surrogate explainers of black-box machine learning predictions are of paramount importance in the field of eXplainable Artificial Intelligence since they can be applied to any type of data (images, text and tabular), are model-agnostic and are post-hoc (i.e., can be retrofitted). The Local Interpretable Model-agnostic …

2019-10-29abs ↗pdf ↗

The ability to explain decisions made by AI systems is highly sought after, especially in domains where human lives are at stake such as medicine or autonomous vehicles. While it is often possible to approximate the input-output relations of deep neural networks with a few human-understandable rules, the discovery of t…

2020-02-12abs ↗pdf ↗

Supervised machine learning models boast remarkable predictive capabilities. But can you trust your model? Will it work in deployment? What else can it tell you about the world? We want models to be not only good, but interpretable. And yet the task of interpretation appears underspecified. Papers provide diverse and s…

2016-06-10abs ↗pdf ↗

Proposes sparse local and regional counterfactual rules for robust recourses.

problem Challenges in counterfactual explanations, especially stability, synthesis, and implementation.
method Probabilistic framework using Random Forest to derive sparse local and regional counterfactual rules.
result Effective recourses derived from high-density regions, providing sparse and robust counterfactual rules.

Study evaluates deep learning models for solar flare prediction with interpretability analysis.

problem Lack of interpretability in deep learning models for solar flare prediction.
method Proximity-based metric for analyzing attribution maps generated by Guided Grad-CAM.
result Models' predictions align with active region characteristics, offering insights into their behavior.

Many methods to explain black-box models, whether local or global, are additive. In this paper, we study global additive explanations for non-additive models, focusing on four explanation methods: partial dependence, Shapley explanations adapted to a global setting, distilled additive explanations, and gradient-based e…

2018-01-26abs ↗pdf ↗

INVERT connects neural representations to human-understandable concepts.

problem Lack of understanding and statistical significance in existing explainability methods.
method Inverse Recognition (INVERT) approach that connects learned representations to human-understandable concepts.
result INVERT provides interpretable metrics and statistical significance for representation alignment.

The paper proposes criteria and methods for evaluating and aggregating feature-based model explanations.

problem Lack of quantitative evaluation criteria for feature-based model explanations.
method Developed quantitative evaluation criteria (low sensitivity, high faithfulness, low complexity), devised a framework for aggregation, and derived a new aggregate Shapley value explanation function.
result A new aggregate Shapley value explanation function that minimizes sensitivity.

New definition reveals encoding explanations that retain predictive power.

problem Challenges in evaluating and identifying encoding explanations.
method Developed a definition of encoding based on conditional dependence.
result Existing evaluation scores do not rank non-encoding explanations correctly, but STRIPE-X does.

This study compares feature importance and explainability in quantum vs classical ML models.

problem Lack of transparency in ML models, especially in sensitive fields.
method Comparison of classical ML (SVM, Random Forest) and hybrid quantum ML (VQC, QSVC) models using feature importance and explainability methods.
result Quantum ML models provide insights similar to classical models but with unique quantum features.

GRANITE unifies feature-based explanation methods to reduce disagreement.

problem Disagreement among feature-based explanation methods.
method GRANITE partitions feature space into regions minimizing interaction and distribution influences.
result Unified and consistent feature explanations.

Differentially private algorithms protect model explanations from leaking training data.

problem Model explanations can leak training data, compromising privacy.
method Adaptive differentially private gradient descent algorithm to produce accurate, private explanations.
result Privacy amplification and reduction of overall privacy loss on explanation data.

We consider objective evaluation measures of saliency explanations for complex black-box machine learning models. We propose simple robust variants of two notions that have been considered in recent literature: (in)fidelity, and sensitivity. We analyze optimal explanations with respect to both these measures, and while…

2019-01-27abs ↗pdf ↗

Framework for responsible LLM deployment with human involvement and decentralized technologies.

problem Challenges in deploying LLMs for high-stakes decisions, including data security and accountability.
method Interactive human involvement through multiple iterations, decentralized technologies, and automated auditing.
result Enhanced security and accountability in LLM deployment for financial decisions.

Improves global counterfactual explanations for model recourse.

problem Inability to provide explanations beyond local instances.
method Investigates and improves Actionable Recourse Summaries (AReS) for global counterfactual explanations.
result Develops more efficient and interactive explainability tools.

G-SHAP generates multiple types of explanations for machine learning models.

problem Understanding model predictions and their differences across groups.
method Generalization of SHAP method to produce additional types of explanations.
result G-SHAP produces explanations for classification, intergroup differences, and model failure.

LLMs' explanations are often insufficient and vary with input distribution.

problem Evaluating the sufficiency of LLM explanations without predefined biases.
method Generalizing sufficiency to arbitrary explanations, using LLM's input beliefs, and introducing SCSuff metric.
result Explanation sufficiency can vary with input distribution and is weakly correlated with model size, accuracy, or output entropy.