Research
On-device research index

arXiv research

A locally-built, LLM-digested index of recent arXiv papers in quant finance, geometry/topology, and statistical ML — keyword search served straight from SQLite on this machine.

168,657 papers · 148 categories

Trend · papers per month

141282422563 · Jun 202019922001200920172026
48 results for evaluation benchmark

Language model benchmarks often misrepresent true understanding, revealing vulnerabilities in evaluation methods.

problem Language model benchmarks fail to accurately reflect true language understanding and adaptability.
method Systematic analysis of NLP evaluation frameworks, identifying vulnerabilities in static benchmarks, human evaluation protocols, and LLM-as-judge frameworks.
result Current evaluation methods are unreliable and need improvement to accurately assess LLM performance.

Fidel-TS creates a new benchmark for time series forecasting models.

problem Lack of high-quality benchmarks for time series forecasting models.
method Formalized high-fidelity benchmark principles, including data sourcing integrity, leak-free design, and structural clarity. Created Fidel-TS, a new large-scale benchmark.
result Demonstrated the limitations of prior benchmarks and potential discrepancies in model evaluation.

This paper investigates task-level evaluation in few-shot learning models.

problem The reliability of evaluating and tuning models trained for individual tasks in few-shot learning is not well addressed.
method The paper measures accuracy of performance estimators, considers model selection strategies, and examines the reasons for evaluator failure.
result Cross-validation with a low number of folds is best for estimating model performance, while large number of folds is better for model selection.

The paper clarifies conditions for using benchmark scores in machine learning.

problem Using benchmark scores to draw scientific inferences about learning problems.
method Developing conditions of construct validity inspired by psychological measurement theory.
result Clarifies conditions under which benchmark scores support diverse scientific claims.

The current Deep Learning (DL) landscape is fast-paced and is rife with non-uniform models, hardware/software (HW/SW) stacks, but lacks a DL benchmarking platform to facilitate evaluation and comparison of DL innovations, be it models, frameworks, libraries, or hardware. Due to the lack of a benchmarking platform, the …

2019-11-19abs ↗pdf ↗

Temporal information impacts only a fraction of time series datasets, skewing benchmark evaluations.

problem Temporal information's impact on time series classification is often overestimated.
method Permutation tests on UCR archive to identify datasets where temporal info is irrelevant.
result Many tabular datasets perform well without temporal info, skewing benchmark evaluations.

UCFE benchmarks LLMs in financial tasks with human feedback.

problem Evaluating LLMs' financial task performance and user satisfaction.
method Hybrid approach combining human expert evaluations and dynamic interactions.
result Significant alignment between benchmark scores and human preferences (Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.78).

CSTS benchmarks time series clustering by evaluating correlation structures.

problem Lack of validated ground truth for objectively assessing clustering quality.
method Synthetic benchmark CSTS for evaluating correlation structures in multivariate time series data.
result CSTS enables precise diagnosis of methodological limitations in correlation-based time series clustering.

New benchmark protocol evaluates neural network optimizers for efficiency and data shift sensitivity.

problem Benchmarking neural network optimizers with hyperparameter complexity and data shift sensitivity.
method Proposed a new evaluation protocol combining end-to-end and data-addition training efficiency, using bandit hyperparameter tuning and human study validation.
result No clear winner across all tasks, highlighting the complexity of optimizer performance.

Benchmark detects decision-time leakage in financial backtests.

problem Detecting decision-time leakage in financial machine-learning backtests.
method Toggles one evaluation convention at a time around a clean t+1t{+}1-open reference, holding other factors fixed.
result Inflation is highly selective, affecting specific features and execution methods.

Benchmarking recursive collapse claims with a new framework under false-positive control.

problem Evaluating recursive systems for failure patterns and warning claims.
method Developed Loopzero framework for testing recursive failures, specified claim boundaries in Lean, evaluated under FP constraint, and compared with standard detectors.
result No standard detectors or Loopzero's pre-registered quantile detector achieved the required operating point under the false-positive contract.

Study reveals gaps between simulated and real-world treatment effect evaluation metrics.

problem Evaluation of treatment effect estimation models differs between academic and practical settings.
method Comprehensive empirical study comparing semi-simulated benchmarks and real-world datasets.
result Counterfactual metrics do not reliably predict observable metrics, and rankings from simulated benchmarks do not generalize to real-world data.

OceanForecastBench offers a comprehensive benchmark for data-driven ocean forecasting models.

problem Lack of open-source, standardized benchmarks for data-driven ocean forecasting models.
method Proposes OceanForecastBench, a benchmark with high-quality data and evaluation pipeline.
result Offers the most comprehensive benchmarking framework for data-driven ocean forecasting.

This work introduces benchmarks for evaluating nanophotonic structures in design simulations.

problem Design and understanding of nanophotonic structures for various applications.
method Development of frameworks and benchmarks for evaluating nanophotonic structures in parametric design problems.
result Strategic use of evaluation fidelity in enhancing structure designs.

PerturBench benchmarks ML models for cellular perturbation analysis.

problem Standardizing benchmarking in modeling single cell transcriptomic responses to perturbations.
method Modular platform, diverse datasets, metrics, extensive evaluation, rank metrics.
result Simpler models are competitive and scale well with larger datasets.

Randomly guessing weights helps analyze RL benchmarks objectively.

problem Understanding the complexity of reinforcement learning benchmarks.
method Generate policy networks by randomly guessing their parameters, evaluate on benchmarks, and analyze results.
result Small untrained networks can provide a robust baseline for various RL tasks.

Machine learning (ML) needs industry-standard performance benchmarks to support design and competitive evaluation of the many emerging software and hardware solutions for ML. But ML training presents three unique benchmarking challenges absent from other domains: optimizations that improve training throughput can incre…

2019-10-02abs ↗pdf ↗

GIFT-Eval benchmarks time series forecasting models across diverse datasets.

problem Lack of comprehensive benchmarks for evaluating time series foundation models.
method Developed GIFT-Eval, a benchmark with 23 datasets, 177 million data points, and 144,000 time series.
result Promotes evaluation of foundation models across various domains and frequencies.

Study introduces a benchmark suite for evaluating neural MI estimators on real-world unstructured datasets.

problem Lack of comprehensive evaluation methods for neural MI estimators on real-world unstructured datasets.
method Developed a benchmark suite using same-class sampling and a binary symmetric channel trick.
result Showed accurate manipulation of true MI values of real-world datasets.

FinReflectKG - EvalBench benchmarks financial KG extraction from SEC 10-K filings.

problem Lack of universal benchmark and evaluation framework for financial KG construction.
method Agentic and holistic evaluation principles, deterministic commit-then-justify judging protocol, binary and ordinal evaluations.
result Reflection-based extraction outperforms single-pass extraction in comprehensiveness, precision, and relevance.

New framework assesses graph-learning datasets for better evaluation.

problem Insufficient evaluation of graph-learning datasets and methods.
method Introduces Rings framework for dataset ablations and proposes performance separability and mode complementarity measures.
result Demonstrates utility of Rings framework for graph-learning dataset evaluation.

QUACKIE creates a new benchmark for NLP interpretability.

problem Evaluating NLP interpretability methods is challenging due to biased ground truths.
method Formulated a custom classification task from question-answering datasets, generating unbiased ground truths.
result Demonstrated the effectiveness of current interpretability methods on the new benchmark.

Scoping review and benchmarking of synthetic EHR data generation methods.

problem Creating realistic synthetic electronic health records for research and training.
method Conducted a scoping review and benchmarked seven methods on open-source EHR datasets.
result GAN-based methods excel in fidelity and utility, while rule-based methods excel in privacy protection.

INT benchmark tests theorem proving agents' ability to generalize to unseen theorems.

problem Evaluating theorem proving agents' ability to generalize to unseen theorems.
method INT benchmark based on a theorem generation and proof procedure with adjustable knobs for measuring 6 types of generalization.
result MCTS can help agents prove new theorems.

YAHPO Gym introduces a new benchmark for evaluating hyperparameter optimization methods.

problem Evaluating and comparing hyperparameter optimization methods on well-curated benchmark suites.
method Surrogate-based benchmark collection of 14 scenarios, each with multi-fidelity and multi-objective hyperparameter optimization problems.
result Surrogate-based benchmarks produce more faithful results than tabular benchmarks.

Study benchmarks 19 survival models on 34 datasets, finding Cox model still best.

problem Quantitative comparison of survival models on low-dimensional data.
method Comprehensive benchmarking of 19 models on 34 datasets, tuning and evaluating using 6 metrics.
result Cox Proportional Hazards model remains best overall for low-dimensional, right-censored data.

AI benchmarks evaluate football team performance using generative models.

problem Evaluating human performance in complex interactive tasks is error-prone and unreliable.
method Trained Conditional VRNN Model on player and ball tracking data to imitate and predict team interactions.
result Trained model as a useful benchmark for evaluating team performance in football.

DIGEN benchmark provides synthetic datasets for ML algorithm evaluation.

problem Understanding and comparing machine learning algorithms' performance.
method Synthetic datasets generated using 40 mathematical functions to evaluate machine learning algorithms.
result DIGEN resource facilitates understanding why algorithms perform poorly and provides ideas for improvement.

Paper establishes a comprehensive benchmark for ECG time-series analysis.

problem Incomplete understanding of ECG signal properties and limitations in evaluation metrics.
method Categorization of downstream applications, identification of limitations, introduction of a novel metric, benchmarking of time-series models.
result Validation of the effectiveness of the proposed metric and model architecture.

Benchmark evaluates LLM trading agents by masking identifiers to prevent memory leaks.

problem Evaluate LLM trading agents without relying on market memory or noise.
method Data-side masking protocol, Barra-style performance attribution framework.
result LLM agents' returns are largely explained by market and style exposure, not stock selection.

New method improves consistency of reinforcement learning performance evaluations.

problem Inconsistent performance results in reinforcement learning due to flawed evaluation metrics.
method Proposes a new comprehensive evaluation methodology for reinforcement learning algorithms.
result Demonstrates improved reliability of performance measurements for reinforcement learning algorithms.

RETINA Benchmark evaluates Bayesian deep learning on diabetic retinopathy detection.

problem Reliable uncertainty quantification for deep learning models in medical applications.
method Design and evaluation of a real-world diabetic retinopathy dataset and tasks.
result Benchmarking of Bayesian deep learning methods on diabetic retinopathy detection tasks.

TUDataset provides benchmark datasets for graph learning.

problem Lack of meaningful benchmark datasets and standardized evaluation procedures for graph learning.
method Collection and standardization of 120 graph datasets from various applications.
result Standardized evaluation procedures and baseline experiments provided.

A new framework evaluates large language models efficiently and accurately.

problem Evaluation of large language models is challenging due to stochasticity and heterogeneity of benchmarks.
method Interpretable and scalable framework based on Item Response Theory (IRT) and majorization-minimization principle.
result Our method achieves superior scalability and interpretability compared to existing approaches.

This study analyzes NAS benchmarks and finds that only a subset of operations is crucial for generating high-performing architectures.

problem NAS benchmarks lack generability and provide skewed performance distributions, leading to unreliable comparisons.
method Empirical analysis of widely used NAS benchmarks (101, 201, TransNAS-Bench-101) focusing on operation importance and generability.
result Only a subset of operations is necessary to generate architectures close to the upper-bound performance range, and convolution layers have the highest impact.