Research
On-device research index

arXiv research

A locally-built, LLM-digested index of recent arXiv papers in quant finance, geometry/topology, and statistical ML — keyword search served straight from SQLite on this machine.

168,932 papers · 148 categories

Trend · papers per month

110220329439 · Jun 202019922001200920172026
48 results for accuracy vs fairness

This work analyzes fairness-accuracy trade-offs using causal methods.

problem Discriminatory behavior in machine learning systems based on sensitive characteristics.
method Introduces path-specific excess loss (PSEL) and causal fairness/utility ratio to quantify trade-offs.
result Shows how enforcing fairness constraints can reduce discrimination while increasing loss.

The paper introduces a new bias measure, infra-marginality, to quantify unfairness in group fairness.

problem The trade-off between group fairness and individual-level bias in decision-making.
method Proposes a new notion of ηη-infra-marginality, proves its independence from accuracy, and provides practical methods to measure and avoid it.
result High accuracy does not lead to high infra-marginality, but maximizing group fairness often increases infra-marginality.

FADE framework improves fairness and accuracy in ensemble learning.

problem Improving fairness in existing models without sacrificing accuracy.
method Flexible fair ensemble learning framework targeting multiple fairness criteria.
result Multiple unfairness measures can be minimized simultaneously with little impact on accuracy.

We identify and optimize the fairness-accuracy tradeoff through TAF Curves and FAUC metrics.

problem Balancing fairness and accuracy in machine learning models for high-stakes decisions.
method Developed TAF Curves and FAUC metric to quantify the tradeoff, and introduced FairStacks framework to expand the Pareto frontier.
result FairStacks framework expands the empirical Pareto frontier and improves the FAUC for model ensembles.

FairVIC improves fairness in neural networks without sacrificing accuracy.

problem Mitigating bias in automated decision-making systems, particularly in deep learning models.
method Integrates variance, invariance, and covariance terms into the loss function during training to abstract fairness concepts.
result Significant improvements in fairness across all tested metrics without compromising accuracy.

Researchers study fairness-accuracy tradeoffs in predictive models for multiple groups.

problem Understanding the tradeoff between fairness and accuracy in models serving multiple demographic groups.
method Characterizing the fairness-accuracy (FA) Pareto frontier, approximating it from limited data, and bounding the worst-case gap.
result Derivation of worst-case-optimal estimators and uniform finite-sample bounds for the entire FA frontier.

The paper tackles the trade-off between fairness and accuracy in machine learning models.

problem Ensuring fairness in machine learning often reduces model accuracy.
method The paper introduces formal tools for reconciling the fairness-accuracy tension using Pareto optimality from multi-objective optimization.
result The Chebyshev scalarization scheme is superior for finding Pareto optimal solutions compared to the linear scalarization scheme.

New research shows no trade-off between fairness and accuracy in machine learning.

problem The trade-off between fairness and accuracy in machine learning is a widely accepted belief.
method Using mismatched hypothesis testing and Chernoff information, the study demonstrates that optimal fairness and accuracy can be achieved simultaneously.
result There is no inherent trade-off between fairness and accuracy in ideal distributions, but it exists when measured with respect to biased datasets.

The paper tackles fairness and accuracy in ML models under domain shifts.

problem Designing fair and accurate ML models that perform well in unseen domains.
method Theoretical bounds and sufficient conditions for fairness and accuracy transfer under domain generalization.
result A learning algorithm that ensures fair and accurate models even when deployment environments change.

Objectives: Discussions of fairness in criminal justice risk assessments typically lack conceptual precision. Rhetoric too often substitutes for careful analysis. In this paper, we seek to clarify the tradeoffs between different kinds of fairness and between fairness and accuracy. Methods: We draw on the existing liter…

2017-03-27abs ↗pdf ↗

Proposes FACT, a diagnostic for understanding group fairness trade-offs.

problem Group fairness notions often conflict with each other, requiring a cost in model performance.
method Characterizes trade-offs via the fairness-confusion tensor and optimizes accuracy and fairness objectives.
result Demonstrates the use of FACT on synthetic and real datasets to understand accuracy-fairness trade-offs.

The paper explores the incompatibility between fair privacy, need-to-know, and fairness in classifier outputs.

problem The interaction between fair privacy, need-to-know, and fairness in classifier outputs.
method Formulated and explored the interaction between fair privacy, need-to-know, and fairness in classifier outputs.
result Optimal classifiers are generally incompatible with fair privacy and need-to-know.

The paper explores the tradeoff between fairness and accuracy in regression models.

problem Characterizing the tradeoff between fairness and accuracy in regression models.
method Provided a lower bound on the error of any fair regressor and extended the result to joint error using Wasserstein distance.
result Lower bounds on the error of fair regressors and their connection to Wasserstein distance.

This paper improves fairness in recommendation systems by learning individual preferences across multiple dimensions.

problem Fairness in recommender systems, especially in areas with social impact.
method Opportunistic multi-aspect re-ranking approach that learns individual preferences and enhances provider fairness.
result Achieves a better trade-off between accuracy and fairness across multiple fairness dimensions.

A novel multi-objective optimization framework improves insurance pricing fairness.

problem Exacerbated trade-offs between competing fairness criteria in insurance pricing using machine learning.
method Proposes a novel multi-objective optimization framework using NSGA-II to jointly optimize accuracy and fairness criteria.
result Consistently achieves a balanced compromise between accuracy and fairness, outperforming single-model approaches.

A new method learns fair classifiers without sacrificing accuracy.

problem Designing fair classifiers that do not discriminate based on sensitive attributes.
method A model-agnostic multi-objective architecture using a differentiable relaxation of fairness notions.
result Our method achieves lower loss of accuracy compared to current debiasing algorithms.

DeepFair improves fairness in recommender systems without sacrificing accuracy.

problem Lack of bias management in recommender systems leads to unfair recommendations for minority groups.
method Deep Learning based Collaborative Filtering algorithm that balances fairness and accuracy.
result It is possible to make fair recommendations without losing significant accuracy.

Fair machine learning models can be vulnerable to adversarial attacks that reduce their accuracy and fairness.

problem Fairness constraints in machine learning models can compromise their robustness against adversarial attacks.
method Analysis of data poisoning attacks on group-based fair machine learning models, focusing on equalized odds.
result Adversaries can significantly reduce the test accuracy of fair machine learning models and widen their fairness gap.

A distributed framework protects privacy while maintaining fairness in machine learning.

problem Protecting personal demographic data while ensuring fair machine learning outcomes.
method A distributed framework with private third-party data communication, ensuring privacy and fairness.
result Four fair learning methods consistently outperform existing ones in fairness and accuracy across three real-world datasets.

The paper characterizes a fundamental tradeoff between fairness and accuracy in classification problems.

problem Characterizing the inherent tradeoff between fairness and accuracy in classification problems.
method Provided a lower bound on the sum of group-wise errors of any fair classifiers, and constructed an algorithm to achieve optimal accuracy and fairness.
result Lower bounds on the sum of group-wise errors of fair classifiers, showing an inherent tradeoff between fairness and accuracy.

Fair classification has been a topic of intense study in machine learning, and several algorithms have been proposed towards this important task. However, in a recent study, Friedler et al. observed that fair classification algorithms may not be stable with respect to variations in the training dataset -- a crucial con…

2019-02-21abs ↗pdf ↗

Develops a framework for fair semi-supervised learning.

problem Balancing fairness and accuracy in semi-supervised learning.
method Formulates a framework as an optimization problem, incorporating classifier loss, label propagation loss, and fairness constraints.
result Achieves fair semi-supervised learning with better accuracy-fairness trade-off than fair supervised learning.

New concept of within-group fairness improves AI fairness without sacrificing accuracy.

problem Fairness issues in AI models treating individuals in the same sensitive group unfairly.
method Introducing within-group fairness, proposing mathematical definitions, and developing learning algorithms.
result Improves within-group fairness without sacrificing accuracy and between-group fairness.

Proposes a framework for balancing fairness and accuracy in data-restricted binary classification.

problem Balancing fairness and accuracy in applications with data restrictions.
method Directly analyzes the optimal Bayesian classifier's behavior under different data-restricting scenarios, formulating convex optimization problems.
result Demonstrates how accuracy of a Bayesian classifier is affected by fairness constraints in various data-restricting scenarios.

Paper introduces EO_k for quantifying accuracy-fairness trade-offs in FRL.

problem Tackles the trade-off between accuracy and fairness in FRL.
method Kernel-based formulation of EO criterion for FRL.
result Offers a unified analytical characterization of fairness tradeoffs.

FanG-HPO optimizes machine learning models for fairness and low energy consumption.

problem Bias in machine learning models and high energy consumption in hyperparameter optimization.
method Combines multi-objective and multiple information source Bayesian optimization.
result FanG-HPO identifies fair and energy-efficient machine learning models.

Automates fairness and accuracy optimization in deep learning models for tabular data.

problem Improving fairness and accuracy in neural models for tabular data.
method Employed multi-objective Neural Architecture Search (NAS) and Hyperparameter Optimization (HPO) to find new models.
result Jointly optimized architectures that consistently outperform single-objective fairness mitigation methods.

A central goal of algorithmic fairness is to reduce bias in automated decision making. An unavoidable tension exists between accuracy gains obtained by using sensitive information (e.g., gender or ethnic group) as part of a statistical model, and any commitment to protect these characteristics. Often, due to biases pre…

2018-10-19abs ↗pdf ↗

Fairness constraints can improve accuracy from biased data.

problem Learning from biased training data can produce biased and suboptimal classifiers.
method Examined fairness-constrained ERM and other recovery methods.
result Equal Opportunity fairness constraint combined with ERM provably recovers Bayes Optimal Classifier under various bias models.

FairACE improves fairness in GNNs by balancing node performance across degree groups.

problem Degree biases in GNNs lead to unequal prediction performance among nodes with varying degrees.
method Integrates asymmetric contrastive learning with adversarial training to balance performance between high-degree and low-degree nodes.
result Significantly improves degree fairness metrics while maintaining competitive accuracy.

Optimal LDP mechanisms reduce data unfairness in classification.

problem Reducing data unfairness in classification models.
method Developed a closed-form optimal mechanism for binary attributes and a tractable framework for multi-valued attributes.
result Optimal LDP mechanisms improve fairness in classification while maintaining accuracy close to non-private models.

Fair active learning selects data points to balance model accuracy and fairness.

problem Ensuring fairness in machine learning models used in high-stakes applications.
method Designing algorithms for fair active learning that select data points to balance model accuracy and fairness.
result Demonstrated the effectiveness and efficiency of fair active learning algorithms over benchmark datasets.

Fair active learning selects data points to balance model accuracy and fairness.

problem Ensuring fairness in machine learning models used in high-stakes applications.
method Designing algorithms for fair active learning that select data points to balance model accuracy and fairness, focusing on demographic parity.
result Demonstrated the effectiveness of the proposed fair active learning approach over benchmark datasets.

Framework for fair classification with noisy protected attributes and provable guarantees.

problem Fair classification with noisy protected attributes.
method Optimization framework for linear and linear-fractional fairness constraints, handling multiple non-binary attributes.
result Provably fair classifier with minimal accuracy loss, even with large noise.