Positive-unlabeled (PU) learning trains a binary classifier using only positive and unlabeled data. A common simplifying assumption is that the positive data is representative of the target positive class. This assumption rarely holds in practice due to temporal drift, domain shift, and/or adversarial manipulation. Thi…
On-device research index
arXiv research
A locally-built, LLM-digested index of recent arXiv papers in quant finance, geometry/topology, and statistical ML — keyword search served straight from SQLite on this machine.
168,657 papers · 148 categories
Trend · papers per month
48 results for “Positive Unlabeled Data”
Prevents sensitive data generation in diffusion models using labeled and unlabeled data.
problem Generating sensitive data in diffusion models using unlabeled data.
method Positive-Unlabeled Diffusion Models, approximating ELBO with labeled and unlabeled data.
result Prevents the generation of sensitive data without compromising image quality.
Paper tackles survival data analysis with positive and unlabeled observations.
problem Traditional survival analysis yields biased results with positive-unlabeled data.
method Developed parametric, nonparametric, and machine learning models for positive and unlabeled survival data.
result Proposed estimation method provides valid results for positive-unlabeled survival data.
Improves anomaly detection with contaminated unlabeled data.
problem Weakness in existing semi-supervised anomaly detection methods when unlabeled data contain anomalies.
method Integrates positive-unlabeled learning with deep anomaly detection models.
result Achieves better detection performance on various datasets.
Assessing the performance of a learned model is a crucial part of machine learning. However, in some domains only positive and unlabeled examples are available, which prohibits the use of most standard evaluation metrics. We propose an approach to estimate any metric based on contingency tables, including ROC and PR cu…
This paper defines a positive and unlabeled classification problem for standard GANs, which then leads to a novel technique to stabilize the training of the discriminator in GANs. Traditionally, real data are taken as positive while generated data are negative. This positive-negative classification criterion was kept f…
On Leveraging Unlabeled Data for Concurrent Positive-Unlabeled Classification and Robust Generationcs.LG
Paper tackles leveraging unlabeled data for PU classification and robust generation.
problem Scarcity of labeled data in machine learning problems.
method Introduces a novel training framework that simultaneously targets PU classification and conditional generation using extra unlabeled data.
result Proves the effectiveness of a Classifier-Noise-Invariant Conditional GAN (CNI-CGAN) that enhances PU classifier performance and leverages extra data.
Learning from positive and unlabeled data or PU learning is the setting where a learner only has access to positive examples and unlabeled data. The assumption is that the unlabeled data can contain both positive and negative examples. This setting has attracted increasing interest within the machine learning literatur…
We develop a classification algorithm for estimating posterior distributions from positive-unlabeled data, that is robust to noise in the positive labels and effective for high-dimensional data. In recent years, several algorithms have been proposed to learn from positive-unlabeled data; however, many of these contribu…
Improves PU learning for imbalanced data with practical AUL estimation and new training method.
problem Training binary classifiers on datasets with only positive and unlabeled samples.
method Asymptotic unbiased AUL estimation and ProbTagging for imbalanced data.
result ProbTagging increases AUC by up to 10% on industrial and artificial data sets.
A common approach in positive-unlabeled learning is to train a classification model between labeled and unlabeled data. This strategy is in fact known to give an optimal classifier under mild conditions; however, it results in biased empirical estimates of the classifier performance. In this work, we show that the typi…
A new method for PU learning improves classification error on CIFAR-10.
problem Learning from positive and unlabeled data in practical applications.
method A simple yet effective data augmentation method based on consistency regularization.
result Achieves an averaged improvement of 3.40 points in classification error on CIFAR-10.
A new method predicts true classes from positive and unlabeled data with additional labeled observations.
problem Predicting true classes from positive and unlabeled data with selection bias.
method Introduces augmented PU prediction, allowing feature-dependent labeling, and compares various empirical Bayes rules.
result The variational autoencoder-based method performs similarly or better than other methods and improves accuracy for unlabeled samples.
New model tackles PU data with better accuracy.
problem Addressing positive and unlabeled data challenges.
method Double Exponential Tilting Model (DETM)
result DETM effectively handles selected at random PU data.
A new PU classifier PUAL tackles trifurcate data issues.
problem Training classifiers on trifurcate data containing only labeled-positive instances and unlabeled instances.
method PUAL classifier with asymmetric loss and kernel-based algorithm.
result PUAL achieves satisfactory classification on trifurcate data.
This paper reviews PU learning evaluation methods and provides practical recommendations.
problem Evaluating PU learning methods when only positive and unlabelled data are available.
method Critical review of 51 articles proposing PU classifiers and alternative predictive accuracy measures.
result Practical recommendations for improving PU learning evaluation.
Positive-Unlabeled (PU) learning is an analog to supervised binary classification for the case when only the positive sample is clean, while the negative sample is contaminated with latent instances of positive class and hence can be considered as an unlabeled mixture. The objectives are to classify the unlabeled sampl…
In the early history of positive-unlabeled (PU) learning, the sample selection approach, which heuristically selects negative (N) data from U data, was explored extensively. However, this approach was later dominated by the importance reweighting approach, which carefully treats all U data as N data. May there be a new…
New method for PU learning with instance-dependent propensity scores.
problem Learning from positive and unlabeled data with instance-dependent labeling.
method Empirical risk minimization of joint risk function, alternating optimization of posterior probability and propensity score.
result The method achieves comparable or better performance than state-of-the-art methods.
Improved classifier for PU data using logistic regression.
problem Analysis of Positive Unlabeled data under SCAR assumption.
method Fitting misspecified logistic regression model to PU data.
result The classifier performs on par or better than competitors on real data sets.
We consider the problem of learning a binary classifier from a training set of positive and unlabeled examples, both in the inductive and in the transductive setting. This problem, often referred to as \emph{PU learning}, differs from the standard supervised classification problem by the lack of negative examples in th…
We consider a problem of learning a binary classifier only from positive data and unlabeled data (PU learning) and estimating the class-prior in unlabeled data under the case-control scenario. Most of the recent methods of PU learning require an estimate of the class-prior probability in unlabeled data, and it is estim…
Meta-learning method improves PU classification performance.
problem Improving binary classifiers from PU data in unseen tasks.
method Adapts model to PU data using related tasks and neural networks.
result Proposed method outperforms existing methods on synthetic and real-world datasets.
Estimates class prior for unlabeled data using kernel embedding.
problem Estimating class prior in PU learning scenario where only positive and full population samples are available.
method Direct estimator based on distribution matching and kernel embedding in Reproducing Kernel Hilbert Space.
result Asymptotic consistency and explicit deviation bound for the estimator.
Test verifies if data meets SCAR assumption for PU learning.
problem Verify if labeling mechanism follows SCAR assumption in PU learning.
method Generate artificial labels, mimic distribution of test statistic.
result Test detects deviations from SCAR and controls type I error.
New method debiases selection bias in PU classification with exposure data.
problem Binary classification from positive and unlabeled data with selection bias.
method Automatic Debiased PUE (ADPUE) learning method.
result ADPUE outperforms traditional PU learning methods on various datasets.
In recent years, the softmax model and its fast approximations have become the de-facto loss functions for deep neural networks when dealing with multi-class prediction. This loss has been extended to language modeling and recommendation, two fields that fall into the framework of learning from Positive and Unlabeled d…
In-context learning solves PU classification without iterative optimization.
problem Binary classification with only labeled positives and unlabeled samples.
method Pretrained transformer (PUICL) that learns from synthetic PU datasets.
result Outperforms four standard PU learning baselines on 20 benchmarks.
We consider the problem of estimating the class prior in an unlabeled dataset. Under the assumption that an additional labeled dataset is available, the class prior can be estimated by fitting a mixture of class-wise data distributions to the unlabeled data distribution. However, in practice, such an additional labeled…
PUATE: Efficient Average Treatment Effect Estimation from Treated (Positive) and Unlabeled Unitscs.LG
New method estimates treatment effects from treated and unlabeled units.
problem Estimating ATEs with missing data and weak supervision.
method Develops semiparametric efficient estimators for ATE in PU learning.
result Constructs estimators that achieve semiparametric efficiency bounds.
In this work, we consider the task of classifying binary positive-unlabeled (PU) data. The existing discriminative learning based PU models attempt to seek an optimal reweighting strategy for U data, so that a decent decision boundary can be found. However, given limited P data, the conventional PU models tend to suffe…
LLM evaluation suffers from systematic biases and lacks reliable positive judgments.
problem LLM evaluation suffers from systematic biases and lacks reliable positive judgments.
method Formulate LLM evaluation as a positive-unlabelled learning problem and propose a geometric auditing framework based on Partial Optimal Transport.
result Improved alignment with human preferences, increased robustness to presentation biases, and interpretable confidence estimates.
Proposes PUUPL for PUL in imbalanced datasets, boosting minority class signals.
problem Imbalanced datasets and model calibration in PUL.
method Uncertainty-aware pseudo-labeling procedure (PUUPL).
result Substantial performance gains in highly imbalanced settings.
Model predicts future term connections in biomedical research.
problem Capturing temporal dynamics and unobserved connections in biomedical term relationships.
method Variational inference model for positive-unlabeled learning on dynamic graphs.
result Model effectively predicts term relationships in real-world datasets.
The positive-unlabeled (PU) classification is a common scenario in real-world applications such as healthcare, text classification, and bioinformatics, in which we only observe a few samples labeled as "positive" together with a large volume of "unlabeled" samples that may contain both positive and negative samples. Bu…
Beyond the Selected Completely At Random Assumption for Learning from Positive and Unlabeled Datacs.LG
Most positive and unlabeled data is subject to selection biases. The labeled examples can, for example, be selected from the positive set because they are easier to obtain or more obviously positive. This paper investigates how learning can be ena BHbled in this setting. We propose and theoretically analyze an empirica…
Existing algorithms aiming to learn a binary classifier from positive (P) and unlabeled (U) data generally require estimating the class prior or label noises ahead of building a classification model. However, the estimation and classifier learning are normally conducted in a pipeline instead of being jointly optimized.…
Bottlenecks of binary classification from positive and unlabeled data (PU classification) are the requirements that given unlabeled patterns are drawn from the test marginal distribution, and the penalty of the false positive error is identical to the false negative error. However, such requirements are often not fulfi…
Paper proposes a new loss function for PU learning without negative examples.
problem Traditional machine learning struggles with negative examples, leading to biased predictions.
method Developed a collective loss function (cPU) for positive and unlabeled data.
result The cPU consistently outperforms existing methods in PU learning benchmarks and real-world datasets.
A method for ranking items using distance-based learning from positive and unlabeled data.
problem Learning to rank items without an analytic description of what constitutes a good ranking.
method Combining representations using an integer linear program for ranking items based on nominations.
result The method is effective in simulation and real data examples, especially when supervision is light.
Proposes methods to estimate posterior probability and propensity score functions without assuming constant propensity score.
problem Learning from biased positive-unlabeled data.
method Parametric approach to joint estimation of posterior probability and propensity score functions using maximum likelihood and alternating maximization.
result Proposed methods are comparable or better than existing methods based on Expectation-Maximisation scheme.
Knowledge distillation is a widely used technique for model compression. We posit that the teacher model used in a distillation setup, captures relationships between classes, that extend beyond the original dataset. We empirically show that a teacher model can transfer this knowledge to a student model even on an {\it …
For many interesting tasks, such as medical diagnosis and web page classification, a learner only has access to some positively labeled examples and many unlabeled examples. Learning from this type of data requires making assumptions about the true distribution of the classes and/or the mechanism that was used to selec…
In PU learning, a binary classifier is trained from positive (P) and unlabeled (U) data without negative (N) data. Although N data is missing, it sometimes outperforms PN learning (i.e., ordinary supervised learning). Hitherto, neither theoretical nor experimental analysis has been given to explain this phenomenon. In …
Positive--unlabeled (PU) learning considers two samples, a positive set P with observations from only one class and an unlabeled set U with observations from two classes. The goal is to classify observations in U. Class mixture proportion estimation (MPE) in U is a key step in PU learning. Blanchard et al. [2010] showe…
Maximizing the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) is a standard approach to imbalanced classification. So far, various supervised AUC optimization methods have been developed and they are also extended to semi-supervised scenarios to cope with small sample problems. However, existing semi-supe…
Novel categories are commonly defined as those unobserved during training but present during testing. However, partially labelled training datasets can contain unlabelled training samples that belong to novel categories, meaning these can be present in training and testing. This research is the first to generalise betw…
We present a novel approach to learn binary classifiers when only positive and unlabeled instances are available (PU learning). This problem is routinely cast as a supervised task with label noise in the negative set. We use an ensemble of SVM models trained on bootstrap resamples of the training data for increased rob…