Research
On-device research index

arXiv research

A locally-built, LLM-digested index of recent arXiv papers in quant finance, geometry/topology, and statistical ML — keyword search served straight from SQLite on this machine.

168,695 papers · 148 categories

Trend · papers per month

141281422562 · Jun 202019922001200920172026
48 results for Label Smoothing Regularization

Regularization is an effective way to promote the generalization performance of machine learning models. In this paper, we focus on label smoothing, a form of output distribution regularization that prevents overfitting of a neural network by softening the ground-truth labels in the training data in an attempt to penal…

2020-01-07abs ↗pdf ↗

Logit regularization induces logit clustering, affecting classifier performance.

problem Understanding the mechanism of logit regularization in classification.
method Analysis of logit regularization in linear classification, proving logit clustering leads to Fisher's Linear Discriminant alignment.
result Logit regularization can halve critical sample complexity and induce robust generalization.

Self-distillation improves model performance by increasing teacher diversity and smoothing predictions.

problem Improving model generalization and performance through self-distillation.
method Interpreting self-distillation as MAP estimation and proposing instance-specific label smoothing.
result Self-distillation enhances model performance by increasing teacher diversity and smoothing predictions.

Noisy labels often occur in vision datasets, especially when they are obtained from crowdsourcing or Web scraping. We propose a new regularization method, which enables learning robust classifiers in presence of noisy data. To achieve this goal, we propose a new adversarial regularization scheme based on the Wasserstei…

2019-04-08abs ↗pdf ↗

Recently, a variety of regularization techniques have been widely applied in deep neural networks, such as dropout, batch normalization, data augmentation, and so on. These methods mainly focus on the regularization of weight parameters to prevent overfitting effectively. In addition, label regularization techniques su…

2019-08-15abs ↗pdf ↗

Modern deep neural networks require a tremendous amount of data to train, often needing hundreds or thousands of labeled examples to learn an effective representation. For these networks to work with less data, more structure must be built into their architectures or learned from previous experience. The learned weight…

2019-03-05abs ↗pdf ↗

The study examines label smoothing to improve confidence calibration in fine-tuned LLMs.

problem Improving confidence calibration in fine-tuned large language models (LLMs) after instruction tuning.
method Examine various open-sourced LLMs, label smoothing, and custom kernel design.
result Label smoothing is effective in maintaining confidence calibration but faces challenges in large vocabulary LLMs.

Mixup improves model accuracy and calibration through data transformation and random perturbation.

problem Improving model accuracy and calibration in machine learning.
method Interprets Mixup as empirical risk minimization with data transformation and random perturbation.
result Mixup induces multiple known regularization schemes that prevent overfitting and overconfident predictions.

Proposes a data augmentation method to improve multi-label learning performance.

problem Improving multi-label learning by exploiting label correlations and data augmentation.
method Proposes a novel data augmentation approach that performs clustering on real examples and treats cluster centers as virtual examples, promoting local smoothness through a regularization term.
result Extensive experiments show that the proposed method outperforms state-of-the-art multi-label learning approaches.

Label smoothing improves model robustness against misspecification.

problem Improving model robustness against model misspecification.
method Introducing modified label smoothing (MLSLR) that maintains consistent probability estimation while modifying the loss function.
result MLSLR exhibits higher robustness against model misspecification than conventional label smoothing.

Proposes LsrKD and MrKD to improve neural network training performance.

problem Improving neural network training performance, especially on deep networks.
method Extends Label Smoothing Regularization with Self-Knowledge Distillation, introducing LsrKD and MrKD.
result LsrKD and MrKD significantly improve training performance on deep neural networks.

Label smoothing improves model performance even with noisy labels.

problem Mitigating label noise in deep learning models.
method Examined label smoothing as a technique to cope with label noise and compared it to loss-correction methods.
result Label smoothing is competitive with loss-correction techniques under label noise and beneficial for distillation from noisy data.

Label smoothing improves generalization by controlling generalization loss.

problem Lack of mathematical understanding of label smoothing's effectiveness.
method Proposed a theoretical framework to show how label smoothing controls generalization loss in the label noise setting.
result Predicted an optimal label smoothing point that minimizes generalization loss.

Data augmentation is usually used by supervised learning approaches for offline writer identification, but such approaches require extra training data and potentially lead to overfitting errors. In this study, a semi-supervised feature learning pipeline was proposed to improve the performance of writer identification b…

2018-07-15abs ↗pdf ↗

The generalization and learning speed of a multi-class neural network can often be significantly improved by using soft targets that are a weighted average of the hard targets and the uniform distribution over labels. Smoothing the labels in this way prevents the network from becoming over-confident and label smoothing…

2019-06-06abs ↗pdf ↗

Contrastive regularization improves semi-supervised learning by better propagating confident pseudo-labels.

problem Consistency regularization's limitation in high performance and efficiency.
method Proposes contrastive regularization to update model features, pushing confident labels into unlabeled samples.
result Improves semi-supervised learning tasks with fewer training iterations and robust performance.

Improved diffusion map enhances manifold regularization for semi-supervised learning.

problem Limited performance of manifold regularization models in capturing global structure.
method Enhanced diffusion map with improved label propagation function.
result Proposed method improves manifold regularization model's performance.

Improved fine-tuning with regularization and robustness for noisy labels.

problem Fine-tuning pre-trained models on small datasets can lead to overfitting and memorization.
method PAC-Bayes generalization bound analysis, layer-wise regularization, self-label-correction, label-reweighting.
result Improves performance by 1.76% on average for image classification tasks and 0.75% for few-shot classification.

Improves confidence calibration in neural networks by smoothing labels based on class similarity.

problem Improving confidence calibration in deep neural networks for safety-critical applications.
method Proposes a novel label smoothing technique where label values are based on similarities with the reference class, using different similarity measurements.
result Consistently outperforms state-of-the-art calibration techniques on various datasets and network architectures.

Label Propagation (LPA) and Graph Convolutional Neural Networks (GCN) are both message passing algorithms on graphs. Both solve the task of node classification but LPA propagates node label information across the edges of the graph, while GCN propagates and transforms node feature information. However, while conceptual…

2020-02-17abs ↗pdf ↗

A fast method for discrete OT with group-sparse regularization for class label preservation.

problem Efficiently measuring the distance between two discrete distributions with class labels.
method Fast discrete OT with group-sparse regularizers using gradient-based algorithms.
result Up to 8.6 times faster than original method without degrading accuracy.

Learning to predict multi-label outputs is challenging, but in many problems there is a natural metric on the outputs that can be used to improve predictions. In this paper we develop a loss function for multi-label learning, based on the Wasserstein distance. The Wasserstein distance provides a natural notion of dissi…

2015-06-17abs ↗pdf ↗

We study Label-Smoothing as a means for improving adversarial robustness of supervised deep-learning models. After establishing a thorough and unified framework, we propose several variations to this general method: adversarial, Boltzmann and second-best Label-Smoothing methods, and we explain how to construct your own…

2019-06-27abs ↗pdf ↗

Graph Random Neural Network improves semi-supervised learning on graphs.

problem Over-smoothing, non-robustness, and weak-generalization in GNNs with few labeled nodes.
method Random propagation strategy and consistency regularization.
result Significantly outperforms state-of-the-art GNN baselines on semi-supervised node classification.

We apply the network Lasso to solve binary classification and clustering problems for network-structured data. To this end, we generalize ordinary logistic regression to non-Euclidean data with an intrinsic network structure. The resulting "logistic network Lasso" amounts to solving a non-smooth convex regularized empi…

2018-05-07abs ↗pdf ↗

We propose local distributional smoothness (LDS), a new notion of smoothness for statistical model that can be used as a regularization term to promote the smoothness of the model distribution. We named the LDS based regularization as virtual adversarial training (VAT). The LDS of a model at an input datapoint is defin…

2015-07-02abs ↗pdf ↗

This work compares regularization and constrained inference for label constraints in machine learning.

problem Improving model performance with label constraints in machine learning.
method Comparison of regularization and constrained inference strategies.
result Constrained inference reduces population risk by correcting model violations, while regularization narrows the generalization gap but introduces bias.