Research
On-device research index

arXiv research

A locally-built, LLM-digested index of recent arXiv papers in quant finance, geometry/topology, and statistical ML — keyword search served straight from SQLite on this machine.

168,657 papers · 148 categories

Trend · papers per month

95191286381 · Jun 202019922001200920172026
48 results for Accuracy Disparity

The paper studies and mitigates accuracy disparity in regression models.

problem Accuracy disparity between different demographic subgroups in high-stakes domains.
method Error decomposition theorem and distribution alignment algorithm.
result The proposed algorithm effectively mitigates accuracy disparity while maintaining predictive power.

The paper examines how adversarial robustness affects accuracy disparity across different classes.

problem Understanding the impact of adversarial robustness on accuracy disparity across different classes.
method Linear classifiers under a Gaussian mixture model, decomposing the impact into inherent and imbalance effects.
result Adversarial robustness consistently degrades standard accuracy in balanced classes, but the class imbalance ratio plays a different role in accuracy disparity.

Selective classification can worsen accuracy disparities between groups.

problem Selective classification can magnify existing accuracy disparities between various groups.
method Study of margin distribution and distributionally-robust models.
result Selective classification can uniformly improve each group on distributionally-robust models.

Adversarial training can lead to unfair accuracy disparities between different groups.

problem Adversarial training algorithms introduce unfair accuracy disparities between different groups of data.
method Propose a Fair-Robust-Learning (FRL) framework to mitigate unfairness in adversarial defenses.
result Empirical and theoretical validation of FRL's effectiveness in mitigating unfairness.

New method reduces privacy impact on model accuracy for underrepresented groups.

problem Privacy mechanisms disproportionately affect underrepresented groups in machine learning models.
method Proposes DPSGD-F, a modified DPSGD that adjusts group contributions based on clipping bias.
result DPSGD-F removes disparate impact of differential privacy on model accuracy for protected groups.

Develops methods for fair classification under linear disparity constraints.

problem Disparate impacts of machine learning algorithms on protected groups.
method Bayes-optimal fair classification methods via pre-, in-, and post-processing.
result Explicit forms of Bayes-optimal fair classifiers under linear disparity measures.

Paper explores fair classification with bounded disparity using finite datasets.

problem Ensuring fairness in binary classification with protected groups.
method Minimax optimal approach with fairness constraints and demographic disparity control.
result Proposes FairBayes-DDP+ method that achieves minimax lower bound on fairness-aware excess risk.

A membership inference attack (MIA) against a machine-learning model enables an attacker to determine whether a given data record was part of the model's training data or not. In this paper, we provide an in-depth study of the phenomenon of disparate vulnerability against MIAs: unequal success rate of MIAs against diff…

2019-06-02abs ↗pdf ↗

Following related work in law and policy, two notions of disparity have come to shape the study of fairness in algorithmic decision-making. Algorithms exhibit treatment disparity if they formally treat members of protected subgroups differently; algorithms exhibit impact disparity when outcomes differ across subgroups,…

2017-11-19abs ↗pdf ↗

Study shows label errors impact model disparity metrics, proposing mitigation methods.

problem Impact of label errors on model disparity metrics.
method Empirical study, characterizing label error effects; proposing estimation and relabeling methods.
result Label errors significantly affect model disparity metrics, particularly for minority groups.

Semi-supervised learning benefits the rich more than the poor, affecting fairness.

problem Disparate impact of semi-supervised learning on different sub-populations.
method Theoretical and empirical analysis of a broad family of SSL algorithms using pseudo-labels.
result Semi-supervised learning benefits the rich more than the poor, potentially violating fairness.

What does it mean for an algorithm to be biased? In U.S. law, unintentional bias is encoded via disparate impact, which occurs when a selection process has widely different outcomes for different groups, even as it appears to be neutral. This legal determination hinges on a definition of a protected class (ethnicity, g…

2014-12-11abs ↗pdf ↗

Study highlights fairness issues in travel behavior prediction models.

problem Ethical challenges in travel behavior analysis using machine learning.
method Operationalized computational fairness by equality of opportunity; compared DNN and DCM; introduced absolute correlation regularization.
result Both DNN and DCM predict disparities across social groups, with DNN outperforming DCM in prediction disparities.

Differential privacy (DP) is a popular mechanism for training machine learning models with bounded leakage about the presence of specific points in the training data. The cost of differential privacy is a reduction in the model's accuracy. We demonstrate that in the neural networks trained using differentially private …

2019-05-28abs ↗pdf ↗

Develops a framework for fair semi-supervised learning.

problem Balancing fairness and accuracy in semi-supervised learning.
method Formulates a framework as an optimization problem, incorporating classifier loss, label propagation loss, and fairness constraints.
result Achieves fair semi-supervised learning with better accuracy-fairness trade-off than fair supervised learning.

The paper investigates how data imbalance affects fairness and accuracy in differentially private deep learning.

problem Impact of data imbalance on fairness and accuracy in differentially private deep learning.
method Study the effects of different levels of imbalance in the data on the accuracy and fairness of decisions made by a model trained with differential privacy.
result Small imbalances and loose privacy guarantees can cause disparate impacts on model accuracy and fairness.

Machine learning models (e.g., speech recognizers) are usually trained to minimize average loss, which results in representation disparity---minority groups (e.g., non-native speakers) contribute less to the training objective and thus tend to suffer higher loss. Worse, as model accuracy affects user retention, a minor…

2018-06-20abs ↗pdf ↗

New method improves fairness in DP learning by preventing excessive gradient suppression.

problem Disparate impact on model predictions for minority groups in DP learning.
method Bounded adaptive clipping to prevent excessive gradient suppression.
result Improves worst-class accuracy by over 10 percentage points compared to existing methods.

Study decomposes racial healthcare disparities via shifts in mediator distributions.

problem Racial disparities in healthcare expenditures and their underlying drivers.
method Framework decomposing disparities into mediator distribution shifts and residual components, using MEPS data.
result Substantial disparities persist even when mediators are equalized, suggesting unmeasured or structural factors.

FairWASP optimizes training data to reduce disparities across subgroups.

problem Reducing disparities in model outputs across different subgroups in machine learning.
method A novel pre-processing approach that minimizes Wasserstein distance to the original dataset while satisfying demographic parity.
result Integer weights are optimal, allowing FairWASP to be understood as duplicating or eliminating samples.

Proposes a method to learn fair predictors for multiple subgroups with limited data.

problem Fairness and accuracy issues in learning from multiple subgroups with limited data.
method Formulates a bilevel objective to learn subgroup-specific predictors and a fair predictor that is close to all of them.
result The method effectively controls group sufficiency and generalization error, improving fairness and accuracy.

Study shows explanation disparities in machine learning models are influenced by data and model properties.

problem Disparities in post-hoc machine learning explanation methods across race and gender.
method Simulations and experiments on a real-world dataset to assess challenges to explanation disparities.
result Increased covariate shift, concept shift, and omission of covariates increase explanation disparities, especially for neural network models.

Proposes a method to quantify and decompose disparity in ML models, separating exempt and non-exempt components.

problem Quantifying disparity in ML models, especially when certain features are exempted due to their critical importance.
method Information-theoretic decomposition into exempt and non-exempt components, satisfying desirable properties.
result Proposes a measure of non-exempt disparity that satisfies all desirable properties, and shows impossibility results for observational measures.

BIND removes background noise from binary matrices, improving detection accuracy and fairness.

problem Real data often violates the i.i.d assumption for binary matrix entries, leading to inaccurate detection.
method BIND optimizes detection by estimating row- and column-wise mixture distributions and eliminating background noise.
result BIND effectively removes background noise and increases detection accuracy and fairness.

Privacy affects fairness in classification models, but not drastically.

problem The impact of differential privacy on fairness in classification models.
method Theoretical analysis proving Lipschitz continuity of fairness measures and a non-asymptotic bound on fairness levels.
result Privacy impacts fairness, but not significantly as the number of samples increases.

We provide the asymptotic distribution of the major indexes used in the statistical literature to quantify disparate treatment in machine learning. We aim at promoting the use of confidence intervals when testing the so-called group disparate impact. We illustrate on some examples the importance of using confidence int…

2018-07-17abs ↗pdf ↗

Unified framework for Bayes-optimal classifiers under group fairness.

problem Mitigating disparate impacts from algorithmic predictions in high-stakes decision-making.
method Unified framework based on Neyman-Pearson argument for deriving Bayes-optimal classifiers under group fairness constraints.
result Proposes FairBayes method that directly controls disparity and achieves optimal fairness-accuracy tradeoff.

New method evaluates multiple social disparities using machine learning.

problem Reduction of educational disparities across multiple dimensions.
method Triply-Robust Machine Learning Approach for Causal Decomposition Analysis.
result Simultaneous interventions across multiple domains reduce disparities.

Conformal prediction sets can lead to unfair outcomes.

problem Disparate impact in decision-making with conformal prediction sets.
method Experiments with human participants to demonstrate disparate impact and propose equalizing set sizes across groups.
result Providing prediction sets that satisfy Equalized Coverage increases disparate impact compared to marginal coverage.

The paper analyzes how deep neural networks handle noisy labels and finds disparate impacts.

problem Disparate impacts of noisy labels on instances with different representation frequencies.
method Quantifying harms, analyzing solutions, and comparing their impacts on different frequency instances.
result Existing solutions lead to disparate treatments, benefiting higher-frequency instances more.

DCEM algorithm reduces bias in machine learning models trained on selective labels.

problem Bias in machine learning models trained on selective labels.
method Disparate Censorship Expectation-Maximization (DCEM) algorithm.
result DCEM improves bias mitigation without sacrificing discriminative performance.

Calibrates network confidence for unsupervised domain adaptation.

problem Calibrating a model trained on a source domain to a target domain without labeled data.
method Estimates network accuracy on the target domain and calibrates prediction confidence directly in the target domain.
result Significantly outperforms existing methods across standard datasets.

The paper introduces return parity for fairness in MDPs, addressing delayed and adverse effects.

problem Fairness in MDPs for dynamic domains with delayed and adverse effects.
method Proposes return parity, decomposes return disparity, and develops algorithms for state visitation distributional alignment.
result The proposed algorithms can successfully close the disparity gap while maintaining policy performance.

Removing spurious features can hurt model accuracy and disproportionately affect different groups.

problem Interference from spurious features in robust model performance across different groups.
method Characterization and analysis of spurious feature removal in noiseless overparameterized linear regression.
result Removal of spurious features can decrease accuracy and disproportionately affect different groups, even in balanced datasets.

New method to quantify feature contributions to disparity without access to decision-making model.

problem Quantifying feature contributions to disparity when decision-making model is not accessible.
method Use information theory to measure redundant statistical dependency between protected attribute and feature.
result Quantify feature contributions to disparity using information theory.

Manifold matching works to identify embeddings of multiple disparate data spaces into the same low-dimensional space, where joint inference can be pursued. It is an enabling methodology for fusion and inference from multiple and massive disparate data sources. In this paper we focus on a method called Canonical Correla…

2012-09-17abs ↗pdf ↗